Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons
Rachana Vaidya , Stephane Cui , Bryson Houston , Andrew North , Menghan Chen , Josh Baxter , Jennifer A. Zellers
{"title":"Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons","authors":"Rachana Vaidya , Stephane Cui , Bryson Houston , Andrew North , Menghan Chen , Josh Baxter , Jennifer A. Zellers","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutral, 10° plantar flexion, and 20° dorsiflexion) and two knee positions (90° flexion and full extension), at two academic sites. Participant positioning for ankle testing differed between sites (prone vs long-sitting)—while knee testing used consistent positioning. At the ankle, both joint and participant positioning significantly affected SWS. In the prone position, SWS was lower in neutral compared to dorsiflexed position (3.07 ± 1.13 m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03 m/s, p = 0.013). In long-sitting, SWS was lower in neutral compared to plantarflexed position (2.85 ± 0.53 m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92 m/s, p = 0.016); and SWS was higher in the plantarflexed position when participants were in long-sitting compared to prone (4.86 ± 1.92 m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13 m/s, p = 0.016). Participant positioning affected CV-SWS, with higher variability observed in prone compared to long-sitting in plantarflexed (29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %, p = 0.005) and neutral ankle angles (p = 0.03).</div><div>At the knee, joint position significantly influenced SWS, with higher values in flexed versus extended positions (6.48 ± 3.1 m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3 m/s, p = 0.007). Extending the knee reduced CV-SWS compared to flexed position (14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4, p = 0.044). In conclusion, joint position significantly affected SWS measurements in both the Achilles and patellar tendons, while participant positioning influenced measurement variability. Thus, standardizing joint and participant positioning is important to enhance the reliability of SWE assessments of tendon elasticity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 112427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024005062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutral, 10° plantar flexion, and 20° dorsiflexion) and two knee positions (90° flexion and full extension), at two academic sites. Participant positioning for ankle testing differed between sites (prone vs long-sitting)—while knee testing used consistent positioning. At the ankle, both joint and participant positioning significantly affected SWS. In the prone position, SWS was lower in neutral compared to dorsiflexed position (3.07 ± 1.13 m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03 m/s, p = 0.013). In long-sitting, SWS was lower in neutral compared to plantarflexed position (2.85 ± 0.53 m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92 m/s, p = 0.016); and SWS was higher in the plantarflexed position when participants were in long-sitting compared to prone (4.86 ± 1.92 m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13 m/s, p = 0.016). Participant positioning affected CV-SWS, with higher variability observed in prone compared to long-sitting in plantarflexed (29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %, p = 0.005) and neutral ankle angles (p = 0.03).
At the knee, joint position significantly influenced SWS, with higher values in flexed versus extended positions (6.48 ± 3.1 m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3 m/s, p = 0.007). Extending the knee reduced CV-SWS compared to flexed position (14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4, p = 0.044). In conclusion, joint position significantly affected SWS measurements in both the Achilles and patellar tendons, while participant positioning influenced measurement variability. Thus, standardizing joint and participant positioning is important to enhance the reliability of SWE assessments of tendon elasticity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.