Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS Journal of biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112427
Rachana Vaidya , Stephane Cui , Bryson Houston , Andrew North , Menghan Chen , Josh Baxter , Jennifer A. Zellers
{"title":"Effect of joint angle positioning on shearwave speed and variability with ultrasound shearwave elastography in asymptomatic Achilles and patellar tendons","authors":"Rachana Vaidya ,&nbsp;Stephane Cui ,&nbsp;Bryson Houston ,&nbsp;Andrew North ,&nbsp;Menghan Chen ,&nbsp;Josh Baxter ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Zellers","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutral, 10° plantar flexion, and 20° dorsiflexion) and two knee positions (90° flexion and full extension), at two academic sites. Participant positioning for ankle testing differed between sites (prone vs long-sitting)—while knee testing used consistent positioning. At the ankle, both joint and participant positioning significantly affected SWS. In the prone position, SWS was lower in neutral compared to dorsiflexed position (3.07 ± 1.13  m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03  m/s, p = 0.013). In long-sitting, SWS was lower in neutral compared to plantarflexed position (2.85 ± 0.53  m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92  m/s, p = 0.016); and SWS was higher in the plantarflexed position when participants were in long-sitting compared to prone (4.86 ± 1.92  m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13  m/s, p = 0.016). Participant positioning affected CV-SWS, with higher variability observed in prone compared to long-sitting in plantarflexed (29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %, p = 0.005) and neutral ankle angles (p = 0.03).</div><div>At the knee, joint position significantly influenced SWS, with higher values in flexed versus extended positions (6.48 ± 3.1  m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3  m/s, p = 0.007). Extending the knee reduced CV-SWS compared to flexed position (14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4, p = 0.044). In conclusion, joint position significantly affected SWS measurements in both the Achilles and patellar tendons, while participant positioning influenced measurement variability. Thus, standardizing joint and participant positioning is important to enhance the reliability of SWE assessments of tendon elasticity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 112427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929024005062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of joint positioning on ultrasound shear wave elastography measurements in the Achilles and patellar tendons. Twenty-eight healthy adults underwent SWE assessment of shear wave speed (SWS) and coefficient of variation in SWS (CV-SWS) at three ankle positions (neutral, 10° plantar flexion, and 20° dorsiflexion) and two knee positions (90° flexion and full extension), at two academic sites. Participant positioning for ankle testing differed between sites (prone vs long-sitting)—while knee testing used consistent positioning. At the ankle, both joint and participant positioning significantly affected SWS. In the prone position, SWS was lower in neutral compared to dorsiflexed position (3.07 ± 1.13  m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03  m/s, p = 0.013). In long-sitting, SWS was lower in neutral compared to plantarflexed position (2.85 ± 0.53  m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92  m/s, p = 0.016); and SWS was higher in the plantarflexed position when participants were in long-sitting compared to prone (4.86 ± 1.92  m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13  m/s, p = 0.016). Participant positioning affected CV-SWS, with higher variability observed in prone compared to long-sitting in plantarflexed (29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %, p = 0.005) and neutral ankle angles (p = 0.03).
At the knee, joint position significantly influenced SWS, with higher values in flexed versus extended positions (6.48 ± 3.1  m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3  m/s, p = 0.007). Extending the knee reduced CV-SWS compared to flexed position (14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4, p = 0.044). In conclusion, joint position significantly affected SWS measurements in both the Achilles and patellar tendons, while participant positioning influenced measurement variability. Thus, standardizing joint and participant positioning is important to enhance the reliability of SWE assessments of tendon elasticity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节角度定位对无症状跟腱和髌腱超声剪切波弹性成像的剪切波速度和变异性的影响。
本研究探讨了关节位置对跟腱和髌腱超声剪切波弹性成像测量的影响。28 名健康成年人在两个学术机构接受了三种踝关节位置(中立、10°跖屈和 20°背屈)和两种膝关节位置(90°屈曲和完全伸展)的剪切波速度(SWS)和 SWS 变异系数(CV-SWS)的 SWE 评估。参加者在踝关节测试时的体位在不同地点有所不同(俯卧位与长坐位),而膝关节测试则采用一致的体位。在踝关节测试中,关节和参与者的体位对 SWS 有明显影响。俯卧位时,中立位的 SWS 低于背屈位(3.07 ± 1.13 m/s vs. 3.95 ± 1.03 m/s,p = 0.013)。在长坐位时,与跖屈位相比,中立位的 SWS 更低(2.85 ± 0.53 m/s vs. 4.86 ± 1.92 m/s,p = 0.016);与俯卧位相比,当参与者处于长坐位时,跖屈位的 SWS 更高(4.86 ± 1.92 m/s vs. 3.25 ± 1.13 m/s,p = 0.016)。参与者的体位会影响 CV-SWS,在跖屈(29.3 ± 15.5 % vs 12.4 ± 9.12 %,p = 0.005)和中立踝角(p = 0.03)时,俯卧位比长坐位的变异性更高。膝关节的关节位置对 SWS 有明显影响,屈曲位置的 SWS 值高于伸展位置的 SWS 值(6.48 ± 3.1 m/s vs. 4.60 ± 2.3 m/s,p = 0.007)。与屈膝姿势相比,伸膝姿势降低了 CV-SWS(14.5 ± 11.2 vs 19.2 ± 13.4,p = 0.044)。总之,关节位置对跟腱和髌腱的 SWS 测量有明显影响,而参与者的位置则影响测量的变异性。因此,关节和参与者定位的标准化对于提高肌腱弹性 SWE 评估的可靠性非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
期刊最新文献
Efficient development of subject-specific finite element knee models: Automated identification of soft-tissue attachments The aging Achilles tendon: model-predicted changes in calf muscle neuromechanics Lumbopelvic rhythm analysis by quartiles: Identification of differences in lumbar and pelvic contribution during trunk flexion and extension in subjects with low back pain of different origin. A case-control study Effects of knee joint position on the triceps Suræ torque-size relationship during plantarflexion in healthy young adults Differential T2* changes in tibialis anterior and soleus: Influence of exercise type and perceived exertion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1