Development of medical knowledge content for problem-solving competencies through dialogue with the undergraduate medical education community in Japan.
{"title":"Development of medical knowledge content for problem-solving competencies through dialogue with the undergraduate medical education community in Japan.","authors":"Osamu Nomura, Hiroyuki Komatsu, Yasushi Matsuyama, Takeshi Onoue, Masatomi Ikusaka, Hitoaki Okazaki, Yasuhiko Konishi","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2385707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discrepancies existed between the medical knowledge sections of the Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education (MCC) and the Guidelines for the National Examination for Medical Practitioners (GNEMP) in Japan. These discrepancies have been one of the underlying factors hindering the development of learner-centered medical education in the country. The project team responsible for the 'Problem-Solving' section of the MCC aimed to address discrepancies between the disease lists in the MCC and the GNEMP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We refined the disease list for the 2022 revision of the MCC using a three-phase process: (a) procedure development, (b) selection, and (c) adjudication. First, we developed a scoring system for sifting and prioritizing diseases in the GNEMP, selecting those that met our scoring criteria. An expert adjudication panel then finalized the list of diseases through discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,456 diseases identified in the GNEMP, 781 met the selection criteria. The adjudication panel selected 56 of these diseases to be newly added to the 2022 MCC, resulting in a total of 691 diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The list of diseases defined as required medical knowledge in the MCC was finalized through dialogue among medical education stakeholders, effectively minimizing discrepancies between the MCC and GNEMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":"46 sup1","pages":"S61-S66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2385707","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Discrepancies existed between the medical knowledge sections of the Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education (MCC) and the Guidelines for the National Examination for Medical Practitioners (GNEMP) in Japan. These discrepancies have been one of the underlying factors hindering the development of learner-centered medical education in the country. The project team responsible for the 'Problem-Solving' section of the MCC aimed to address discrepancies between the disease lists in the MCC and the GNEMP.
Method: We refined the disease list for the 2022 revision of the MCC using a three-phase process: (a) procedure development, (b) selection, and (c) adjudication. First, we developed a scoring system for sifting and prioritizing diseases in the GNEMP, selecting those that met our scoring criteria. An expert adjudication panel then finalized the list of diseases through discussion.
Results: Among the 1,456 diseases identified in the GNEMP, 781 met the selection criteria. The adjudication panel selected 56 of these diseases to be newly added to the 2022 MCC, resulting in a total of 691 diseases.
Conclusions: The list of diseases defined as required medical knowledge in the MCC was finalized through dialogue among medical education stakeholders, effectively minimizing discrepancies between the MCC and GNEMP.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.