Familial sex trafficking in the United States: A scoping review guided by the Three Ps Framework to end human trafficking

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107143
Mary K. Brannock , Deborah L. Quesenberry , Michael G. Smith , Roger L. Blackwell
{"title":"Familial sex trafficking in the United States: A scoping review guided by the Three Ps Framework to end human trafficking","authors":"Mary K. Brannock ,&nbsp;Deborah L. Quesenberry ,&nbsp;Michael G. Smith ,&nbsp;Roger L. Blackwell","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Familial sex trafficking is a form of sex trafficking that involves a family member exchanging sex with a child, to someone else, for something of value. Due to its covert nature, human trafficking is severely under-reported, however, in 2021 over 10,500 sex trafficking survivors were reported to the National Human Trafficking Hotline and the majority had a familial recruiter (33 %) (Polaris, 2022). To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review on familial sex trafficking.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The objectives of this study are to map the available peer-reviewed evidence on familial sex trafficking and to synthesize that evidence within the Three Ps Framework and grey literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In summarizing evidence on familial sex trafficking, a scoping review was the chosen design.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight studies were included and identified victim and perpetrator characteristics, practice needs such as services, screening, and training, as well as barriers to prosecution, such as lack of adequate community and interpersonal resources. The grey literature uncovered a similar phenomenon and supplemented peer-reviewed findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This review demonstrates a need for original research that can provide context. Moreover, it highlights how the social determinants of health impact familial sex trafficking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424005337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Familial sex trafficking is a form of sex trafficking that involves a family member exchanging sex with a child, to someone else, for something of value. Due to its covert nature, human trafficking is severely under-reported, however, in 2021 over 10,500 sex trafficking survivors were reported to the National Human Trafficking Hotline and the majority had a familial recruiter (33 %) (Polaris, 2022). To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review on familial sex trafficking.

Objective

The objectives of this study are to map the available peer-reviewed evidence on familial sex trafficking and to synthesize that evidence within the Three Ps Framework and grey literature.

Methods

In summarizing evidence on familial sex trafficking, a scoping review was the chosen design.

Results

Eight studies were included and identified victim and perpetrator characteristics, practice needs such as services, screening, and training, as well as barriers to prosecution, such as lack of adequate community and interpersonal resources. The grey literature uncovered a similar phenomenon and supplemented peer-reviewed findings.

Conclusions

This review demonstrates a need for original research that can provide context. Moreover, it highlights how the social determinants of health impact familial sex trafficking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的家族性人口贩运:以杜绝人口贩运的 "三P "框架为指导的范围界定审查。
背景:家庭性人口贩运是一种性人口贩运形式,涉及家庭成员与儿童进行性交易,以换取有价值的东西。然而,2021 年,全国人口贩运热线收到了超过 10,500 名性贩运幸存者的报告,其中大多数人都有家庭招募者(33%)(Polaris,2022 年)。据我们所知,这是第一份关于家族性人口贩运的范围审查报告:本研究的目标是绘制关于家族性人口贩运的现有同行评审证据图,并在 "三个 Ps 框架 "和灰色文献中对这些证据进行综合:在总结有关家庭性人口贩运的证据时,我们选择了范围综述这一设计方法:结果:纳入了八项研究,确定了受害者和犯罪者的特征、实践需求(如服务、筛查和培训)以及起诉障碍(如缺乏足够的社区和人际资源)。灰色文献发现了类似的现象,并对同行评审的结果进行了补充:本综述表明,需要能够提供背景情况的原创性研究。此外,它还强调了健康的社会决定因素如何影响家庭性交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Victimization, immigration status, and psychosocial well-being: A representative study among finnish adolescents. Factors associated with decisions to refer possible abusive head trauma to a hospital-based child protection team in Aotearoa New Zealand Predictors of mental health during young people's transition from out-of-home care in Austria The risk and protective factors, response to disclosure, and interventions for sibling sexual abuse: A systematic review. Familial sex trafficking in the United States: A scoping review guided by the Three Ps Framework to end human trafficking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1