{"title":"Exploring the performance of a multi–evaporator cascade refrigeration system with R515B/R170 refrigerants: An experimental study","authors":"Parthiban Kasi, M. Cheralathan","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.10.096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents the experimental analysis of the energy and environmental performance of a Multiple Evaporator Cascade Refrigeration System (MECRS) employing an azeotropic refrigerant called R515B for the high temperature cycle (HTC) and natural refrigerant called R170 (Ethane) for the low temperature cycle (LTC) to promote Green Cooling Initiatives (GCI) phase II as a sustainable development goals (SDGs) in refrigeration sector. In MECRS's low temperature cycle, three distinct evaporators are deployed, each featuring unique cooling effects and temperatures while utilizing the same refrigerant. The MECRS have been tested based on thermo-physical properties of alternative refrigerants to ultra-low temperature (ULT) in LTC evaporator. Each MECRS compressors exerts work ranging from 0.252 kW to 1.784 kW, while the system's overall power consumption ranges from 0.605 kWh to 0.715 kWh. Experimental analysis demonstrates a COP for the MECRS ranging from 1.06 to 1.662. As a result of Total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) analysis, a 15 % reduction in carbon emissions realised compared to conventional refrigerants. This study gives promising output of GCI and enhanced energy parameter through experimentation. This study indicates that R515B as the suitable replacement for HTC refrigerant and R170 for LTC refrigerant when compared to traditional refrigerants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"192 ","pages":"Pages 1294-1306"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024013843","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents the experimental analysis of the energy and environmental performance of a Multiple Evaporator Cascade Refrigeration System (MECRS) employing an azeotropic refrigerant called R515B for the high temperature cycle (HTC) and natural refrigerant called R170 (Ethane) for the low temperature cycle (LTC) to promote Green Cooling Initiatives (GCI) phase II as a sustainable development goals (SDGs) in refrigeration sector. In MECRS's low temperature cycle, three distinct evaporators are deployed, each featuring unique cooling effects and temperatures while utilizing the same refrigerant. The MECRS have been tested based on thermo-physical properties of alternative refrigerants to ultra-low temperature (ULT) in LTC evaporator. Each MECRS compressors exerts work ranging from 0.252 kW to 1.784 kW, while the system's overall power consumption ranges from 0.605 kWh to 0.715 kWh. Experimental analysis demonstrates a COP for the MECRS ranging from 1.06 to 1.662. As a result of Total equivalent warming impact (TEWI) analysis, a 15 % reduction in carbon emissions realised compared to conventional refrigerants. This study gives promising output of GCI and enhanced energy parameter through experimentation. This study indicates that R515B as the suitable replacement for HTC refrigerant and R170 for LTC refrigerant when compared to traditional refrigerants.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.