Hao Chen , Kai Yang , Jian Shao , Youwei Liu , Mingjie Zhang , Bin Wei , Haoyu Song , Peng Xiao , Tong Liu , Yuxuan Wan
{"title":"Explosion dynamics for thermal runaway gases of 314 Ah LiFePO4 lithium-ion batteries triggered by overheating and overcharging","authors":"Hao Chen , Kai Yang , Jian Shao , Youwei Liu , Mingjie Zhang , Bin Wei , Haoyu Song , Peng Xiao , Tong Liu , Yuxuan Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.10.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal runaway (TR) of LiFePO<sub>4</sub> lithium-ion batteries (LFPs) can produce significant amounts of smoke, posing serious explosion hazards. This paper systematically investigated TR gas generation, explosion limits, explosion overpressure, and post-explosion gas compositions of 314 Ah LFPs under overcharging and overheating. Quantum chemical and explosion reaction kinetics calculations clarified the elementary reactions and compositional alterations occurring in gases and free radicals during the explosion process. The findings revealed that H<sub>2</sub> constituted the primary component of TR gases, comprising 47.64 % and 53.12 % of the overcharging and overheating, respectively, followed by CO<sub>2</sub> and CO. The ranges of explosion concentration for TR gases, when subjected to overheating and overcharging conditions, were 6.32–29.3 % and 6.83–26.91 %, respectively. At the point of maximum explosion overpressure (<em>P</em><sub>max</sub>), the gas concentrations peaked at 15.86 % and 16.25 %. The elementary reaction R1 held a pivotal position in enhancing the explosion overpressure. As the TR gas concentration escalated, the Rate of Production (ROP) of R31 and R35 also surged, ultimately resulting in elevated concentrations of CO. The reactions R123, R250, and R279 facilitated the generation of H<sub>2</sub> while simultaneously consuming hydrocarbon gases. This resulted in a risk of secondary explosion of the TR gas after the explosion. Post-explosion gas residual quantities followed the order: C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>6</sub> < C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> < CH<sub>4</sub> < H<sub>2</sub> < CO. The results revealed crucial insights for developing explosion prevention and suppression in the process safety industry and Energy Storage Systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"192 ","pages":"Pages 1238-1248"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024013995","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thermal runaway (TR) of LiFePO4 lithium-ion batteries (LFPs) can produce significant amounts of smoke, posing serious explosion hazards. This paper systematically investigated TR gas generation, explosion limits, explosion overpressure, and post-explosion gas compositions of 314 Ah LFPs under overcharging and overheating. Quantum chemical and explosion reaction kinetics calculations clarified the elementary reactions and compositional alterations occurring in gases and free radicals during the explosion process. The findings revealed that H2 constituted the primary component of TR gases, comprising 47.64 % and 53.12 % of the overcharging and overheating, respectively, followed by CO2 and CO. The ranges of explosion concentration for TR gases, when subjected to overheating and overcharging conditions, were 6.32–29.3 % and 6.83–26.91 %, respectively. At the point of maximum explosion overpressure (Pmax), the gas concentrations peaked at 15.86 % and 16.25 %. The elementary reaction R1 held a pivotal position in enhancing the explosion overpressure. As the TR gas concentration escalated, the Rate of Production (ROP) of R31 and R35 also surged, ultimately resulting in elevated concentrations of CO. The reactions R123, R250, and R279 facilitated the generation of H2 while simultaneously consuming hydrocarbon gases. This resulted in a risk of secondary explosion of the TR gas after the explosion. Post-explosion gas residual quantities followed the order: C2H6 < C2H4 < CH4 < H2 < CO. The results revealed crucial insights for developing explosion prevention and suppression in the process safety industry and Energy Storage Systems.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.