{"title":"Nitrogen form differently modulates nitrogen uptake and utilization and related gene expression between two tea cultivars","authors":"Dandan Tang, Zhen Jin, Lu Long, Zhongyue Zhang, Yanjuan Yang, Xiaoqin Tan, Chunjing Yang, Wei Chen, Liqiang Tan, Qian Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nitrogen (N) is essential for the growth and development of tea plants, and ammonium (NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>) and nitrate (NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup>) are crucial N sources for tea yield and amino acid contents. However, the uptake and utilization of different N forms in tea plants are different. Reasonable N form is an important means to enhance the growth and development of tea plants. Therefore, supplying suitable N forms may be effective way to optimize N use efficiency. A hydroponic trial was conducted with 'Chuancha No.2′ (CC) and 'Emeiwenchun' (EW) tea cultivars with N form treatments: NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup> and NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup>. The results showed that there were significant difference in the NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>/NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> uptake kinetics, dynamic changes in <ce:sup loc=\"post\">15</ce:sup>N abundance, enzyme activities, and related gene expression in N metabolism between CC and EW after NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>/NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> treatment. In CC and EW, NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup> and NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> uptake followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics at low N concentrations (< 1 mmol <ce:small-caps>l</ce:small-caps><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-1</ce:sup>), but CC exhibited a slightly higher uptake rate than EW when supplied with 2 mmol <ce:small-caps>l</ce:small-caps><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-1</ce:sup> NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>. In a 0–24 h <ce:sup loc=\"post\">15</ce:sup>N tracing experiment, CC roots accumulated <ce:sup loc=\"post\">15</ce:sup>N faster than EW under NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>. NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>-fed CC exhibited higher GS activities and higher expression levels of <ce:italic>CsAMTs</ce:italic> and genes involved in N utilization, such as <ce:italic>CsNR, CsGS2, CsGDH1</ce:italic>, and <ce:italic>CsTS1</ce:italic>, compared to EW. When NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> was provided, EW roots accumulated more <ce:sup loc=\"post\">15</ce:sup>N than CC roots from 8 to 24 h, which could be attributed to the higher NR activities and higher expression levels of <ce:italic>CsNRT1.5, CsNR, CsGS1.1</ce:italic> and <ce:italic>CsGS1.2</ce:italic> than those in CC. In summary, the two tea varieties exhibited distinct characteristics of N uptake and utilization, as well as gene expression patterns under NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>/NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup> treatments. CC demonstrated an advantage in NH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup> uptake and assimilation, while EW exhibited an advantage in NO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">3</ce:inf><ce:sup loc=\"post\">-</ce:sup>.","PeriodicalId":21679,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Horticulturae","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Horticulturae","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2024.113804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HORTICULTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) is essential for the growth and development of tea plants, and ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) are crucial N sources for tea yield and amino acid contents. However, the uptake and utilization of different N forms in tea plants are different. Reasonable N form is an important means to enhance the growth and development of tea plants. Therefore, supplying suitable N forms may be effective way to optimize N use efficiency. A hydroponic trial was conducted with 'Chuancha No.2′ (CC) and 'Emeiwenchun' (EW) tea cultivars with N form treatments: NH4+ and NO3-. The results showed that there were significant difference in the NH4+/NO3- uptake kinetics, dynamic changes in 15N abundance, enzyme activities, and related gene expression in N metabolism between CC and EW after NH4+/NO3- treatment. In CC and EW, NH4+ and NO3- uptake followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics at low N concentrations (< 1 mmol l-1), but CC exhibited a slightly higher uptake rate than EW when supplied with 2 mmol l-1 NH4+. In a 0–24 h 15N tracing experiment, CC roots accumulated 15N faster than EW under NH4+. NH4+-fed CC exhibited higher GS activities and higher expression levels of CsAMTs and genes involved in N utilization, such as CsNR, CsGS2, CsGDH1, and CsTS1, compared to EW. When NO3- was provided, EW roots accumulated more 15N than CC roots from 8 to 24 h, which could be attributed to the higher NR activities and higher expression levels of CsNRT1.5, CsNR, CsGS1.1 and CsGS1.2 than those in CC. In summary, the two tea varieties exhibited distinct characteristics of N uptake and utilization, as well as gene expression patterns under NH4+/NO3- treatments. CC demonstrated an advantage in NH4+ uptake and assimilation, while EW exhibited an advantage in NO3-.
期刊介绍:
Scientia Horticulturae is an international journal publishing research related to horticultural crops. Articles in the journal deal with open or protected production of vegetables, fruits, edible fungi and ornamentals under temperate, subtropical and tropical conditions. Papers in related areas (biochemistry, micropropagation, soil science, plant breeding, plant physiology, phytopathology, etc.) are considered, if they contain information of direct significance to horticulture. Papers on the technical aspects of horticulture (engineering, crop processing, storage, transport etc.) are accepted for publication only if they relate directly to the living product. In the case of plantation crops, those yielding a product that may be used fresh (e.g. tropical vegetables, citrus, bananas, and other fruits) will be considered, while those papers describing the processing of the product (e.g. rubber, tobacco, and quinine) will not. The scope of the journal includes all horticultural crops but does not include speciality crops such as, medicinal crops or forestry crops, such as bamboo. Basic molecular studies without any direct application in horticulture will not be considered for this journal.