Editorial Commentary: Anatomic Tibiofibular and Partially Anatomic-Based Fibular Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Techniques Are Biomechanically Superior to Non-Anatomic Reconstruction Techniques: A Tibial Tunnel is the Gold Standard for An Anatomic Reconstruction.
Jay Moran, Luke V Tollefson, Christopher M LaPrade, Robert F LaPrade
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Anatomic Tibiofibular and Partially Anatomic-Based Fibular Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Techniques Are Biomechanically Superior to Non-Anatomic Reconstruction Techniques: A Tibial Tunnel is the Gold Standard for An Anatomic Reconstruction.","authors":"Jay Moran, Luke V Tollefson, Christopher M LaPrade, Robert F LaPrade","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nearly two decades ago, the posterolateral corner (PLC) was commonly referred to as the \"dark side\" of the knee due to our limited anatomical understanding, no anatomic-based reconstruction techniques, and high rates of clinical failures. During this time, non-anatomic PLC reconstruction techniques, or \"fibular slings\", gained popularity early on due to ease of the procedure; however, clinical studies demonstrated residual varus gapping and external rotation laxity associated with these non-anatomic techniques that only reconstructed the fibular (lateral) collateral ligament (FCL). The term \"anatomic\" PLC reconstruction generally refers to a procedure that aims to restore the entirety of the 3 main PLC static stabilizers. Currently, the most commonly utilized PLC reconstruction techniques have evolved to be either a complete anatomic reconstruction with a tibiofibular-based (LaPrade and Engebretsen) approach or a partial anatomic reconstruction through a fibular-based (Levy/Marx, Arciero) technique. Both reconstruction approaches incorporate the use of a second femoral tunnel for improved restoration of the femoral attachments of the FCL and popliteus tendon (PLT) and are biomechanically superior compared to the historic non-anatomic techniques. As such, these improved PLC reconstruction techniques, whether tibiofibular-based or fibular-based, are strongly recommended over non-anatomic reconstruction techniques. Compared to the fibular-based approach, an anatomic tibiofibular-based PLC reconstruction more closely recreates the native architecture of the PLC with recreation of the PFL and use of a tibial tunnel to restore the static function of the PLT. In addition, certain conditions, such as concurrent proximal tibiofibular joint instability and asymmetric knee hyperextension are contraindications to using fibular-based reconstructions and should always utilize a tibial tunnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nearly two decades ago, the posterolateral corner (PLC) was commonly referred to as the "dark side" of the knee due to our limited anatomical understanding, no anatomic-based reconstruction techniques, and high rates of clinical failures. During this time, non-anatomic PLC reconstruction techniques, or "fibular slings", gained popularity early on due to ease of the procedure; however, clinical studies demonstrated residual varus gapping and external rotation laxity associated with these non-anatomic techniques that only reconstructed the fibular (lateral) collateral ligament (FCL). The term "anatomic" PLC reconstruction generally refers to a procedure that aims to restore the entirety of the 3 main PLC static stabilizers. Currently, the most commonly utilized PLC reconstruction techniques have evolved to be either a complete anatomic reconstruction with a tibiofibular-based (LaPrade and Engebretsen) approach or a partial anatomic reconstruction through a fibular-based (Levy/Marx, Arciero) technique. Both reconstruction approaches incorporate the use of a second femoral tunnel for improved restoration of the femoral attachments of the FCL and popliteus tendon (PLT) and are biomechanically superior compared to the historic non-anatomic techniques. As such, these improved PLC reconstruction techniques, whether tibiofibular-based or fibular-based, are strongly recommended over non-anatomic reconstruction techniques. Compared to the fibular-based approach, an anatomic tibiofibular-based PLC reconstruction more closely recreates the native architecture of the PLC with recreation of the PFL and use of a tibial tunnel to restore the static function of the PLT. In addition, certain conditions, such as concurrent proximal tibiofibular joint instability and asymmetric knee hyperextension are contraindications to using fibular-based reconstructions and should always utilize a tibial tunnel.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.