Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1111/ajco.14140
Susannah Jacob, Gabriel Gabriel, Mei Ling Yap, Shalini Vinod, Kalinda Griffiths, David Sheehan, Susan Anderson, Geoff Delaney
{"title":"Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018.","authors":"Susannah Jacob, Gabriel Gabriel, Mei Ling Yap, Shalini Vinod, Kalinda Griffiths, David Sheehan, Susan Anderson, Geoff Delaney","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia are significantly worse than in the non-Indigenous population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate demographic factors and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) rates for cervical cancer and to compare these between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations to identify any differences in outcomes or modifiable treatment differences between the populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in the state of New South Wales, Australia, diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2009 and 2018 using linked registry, treatment, and death data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The crude incidence rate for cervical cancer in Aboriginal women in NSW (17.29/100,000) was more than double the rate among non-Aboriginal women (6.77/100,000). Aboriginal women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, including metastatic disease, at a younger age. There was no significant difference in presentation stage, surgery or radiotherapy treatment rates, or overall survival at 5 years between the two populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although access to cancer care looks similar as an aggregate in Aboriginal versus non-Aboriginal populations, there were disparities with reduced access to care (patients who did not receive either radiotherapy or surgery) among Aboriginal patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged or residing in remote areas. The lower age of cancer diagnosis among Aboriginal women may have effects on survivorship, including negative effects on fertility, loss of income, and other personal, social, and economic consequences. Efforts to improve access to care, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment, should be targeted toward younger Aboriginal women and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or those residing in remote areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia are significantly worse than in the non-Indigenous population.

Aim: To evaluate demographic factors and treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) rates for cervical cancer and to compare these between the Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations to identify any differences in outcomes or modifiable treatment differences between the populations.

Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in the state of New South Wales, Australia, diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2009 and 2018 using linked registry, treatment, and death data.

Results: The crude incidence rate for cervical cancer in Aboriginal women in NSW (17.29/100,000) was more than double the rate among non-Aboriginal women (6.77/100,000). Aboriginal women were diagnosed with cervical cancer, including metastatic disease, at a younger age. There was no significant difference in presentation stage, surgery or radiotherapy treatment rates, or overall survival at 5 years between the two populations.

Conclusion: Although access to cancer care looks similar as an aggregate in Aboriginal versus non-Aboriginal populations, there were disparities with reduced access to care (patients who did not receive either radiotherapy or surgery) among Aboriginal patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged or residing in remote areas. The lower age of cancer diagnosis among Aboriginal women may have effects on survivorship, including negative effects on fertility, loss of income, and other personal, social, and economic consequences. Efforts to improve access to care, including screening, diagnosis, and treatment, should be targeted toward younger Aboriginal women and those who are socioeconomically disadvantaged or those residing in remote areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2009-2018 年澳大利亚新南威尔士州患宫颈癌的土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民妇女与非土著居民妇女在流行病学、人口学、治疗(手术和放疗)和存活率方面的比较。
背景:澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的健康状况明显不如非土著居民:澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的健康状况明显差于非土著居民。目的:评估宫颈癌的人口统计因素和治疗率(手术和放疗),并比较土著居民和非土著居民的治疗率,以确定不同人群在治疗结果或可改变的治疗方法方面的差异:使用关联的登记、治疗和死亡数据,对澳大利亚新南威尔士州 2009 年至 2018 年期间确诊为宫颈癌的所有患者进行回顾性队列分析:新南威尔士州原住民妇女的宫颈癌粗发病率(17.29/100,000)是非原住民妇女发病率(6.77/100,000)的两倍多。原住民妇女被诊断出患有宫颈癌(包括转移性疾病)的年龄更小。两种人群在发病分期、手术或放疗治疗率以及 5 年总生存率方面没有明显差异:尽管土著居民与非土著居民获得癌症治疗的总体情况相似,但在社会经济条件较差或居住在偏远地区的土著患者中,获得治疗的机会(未接受放疗或手术治疗的患者)存在差异。原住民妇女确诊癌症的年龄较低,这可能会对她们的生存产生影响,包括对生育的负面影响、收入损失以及其他个人、社会和经济后果。改善医疗服务(包括筛查、诊断和治疗)的工作应针对较年轻的原住民妇女、社会经济条件较差的妇女或居住在偏远地区的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antibiotics and Chronic Medications on Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma. The Case for Shared Decision-making in Oncology and Why the Philippine Healthcare System is Primed for It. Berberine and Lung Cancer: From Pure Form to Its Nanoformulations. Comparison of Epidemiology, Demography, Treatment (Surgery and Radiotherapy), and Survival Between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and Non-Indigenous Women With Cervical Cancer in NSW, Australia in 2009-2018. Real-World Outcomes of Patients Treated With Gemcitabine Using Standardized Dose and Rate and Docetaxel for Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in an Australian Sarcoma Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1