Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2430306
Roger S McIntyre, Angela T H Kwan
{"title":"Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.","authors":"Roger S McIntyre, Angela T H Kwan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2430306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of online and/or compounding pharmacies to access glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) increases the risk for prescription error (e.g. accidental overdose) especially in racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disadvantaged groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sought to evaluate accidental overdose associated with GLP-1 RAs submitted to the United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Case reports of accidental overdose reported to the FAERS were retrieved from Q4 2003 to Q1 2024 using OpenVigil 2.1. Disproportionality of accidental overdose was assessed using reporting odds ratio (ROR). Upper and lower 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated at an alpha level of 5%, where disproportionate reporting was considered when the lower 95% CI was greater than 1.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 3,348 reports of accidental overdose associated with GLP-1 RAs. The RORs were significant for all agents within the class (ROR range: 2.64-61.12, all <i>p</i> < 0.008), including semaglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, and tirzepatide compared to niacin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Inadequate access, availability, and affordability of GLP-1 RAs has contributed to the increased seeking via online and/or compounding pharmacies, and is associated with greater risk for prescription errors that differentially affect racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic vulnerable populations. Pharmacovigilance database analyses cannot establish causation only association.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2430306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of online and/or compounding pharmacies to access glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) increases the risk for prescription error (e.g. accidental overdose) especially in racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disadvantaged groups.

Methods: We sought to evaluate accidental overdose associated with GLP-1 RAs submitted to the United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Case reports of accidental overdose reported to the FAERS were retrieved from Q4 2003 to Q1 2024 using OpenVigil 2.1. Disproportionality of accidental overdose was assessed using reporting odds ratio (ROR). Upper and lower 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated at an alpha level of 5%, where disproportionate reporting was considered when the lower 95% CI was greater than 1.0.

Results: We identified 3,348 reports of accidental overdose associated with GLP-1 RAs. The RORs were significant for all agents within the class (ROR range: 2.64-61.12, all p < 0.008), including semaglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, and tirzepatide compared to niacin.

Conclusions: Inadequate access, availability, and affordability of GLP-1 RAs has contributed to the increased seeking via online and/or compounding pharmacies, and is associated with greater risk for prescription errors that differentially affect racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic vulnerable populations. Pharmacovigilance database analyses cannot establish causation only association.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂意外用药过量报告的增加:一项基于人群的研究。
背景:使用网上药店和/或复合药店购买胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)会增加处方错误(如意外用药过量)的风险,尤其是在种族、民族和社会经济弱势群体中:我们试图评估向美国 FDA 不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 提交的与 GLP-1 RA 相关的意外用药过量情况。使用 OpenVigil 2.1 检索了 2003 年第四季度至 2024 年第一季度向 FAERS 报告的意外用药过量病例报告。意外用药过量的比例失调采用报告几率比(ROR)进行评估。上、下95%置信区间(CI)按5%的α水平计算,当下95%CI大于1.0时,则认为报告不成比例:我们发现了 3,348 例与 GLP-1 RAs 相关的意外用药过量报告。该类药物中所有药物的 ROR 均有显著性(ROR 范围:2.64-61.12,均为 p):GLP-1 RAs 的可及性、可获得性和可负担性不足,导致越来越多的人通过网上和/或复合药房购买 GLP-1 RAs,这与处方错误的风险增加有关,而处方错误对种族、民族和社会经济弱势群体的影响各不相同。药物警戒数据库分析不能确定因果关系,只能确定关联关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Preserving residual kidney function in persons on peritoneal dialysis: the role of pharmacotherapy. Examining the safety of belimumab, especially in children: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Safety concerns of aztreonam: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system. Pharmacovigilance insights into drug-induced cystitis: analysis of FDA data from 2004 to 2024. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1