A Partially Randomized Patient Preference, Sequential, Multiple-Assignment, Randomized Trial Design Analyzed via Weighted and Replicated Frequentist and Bayesian Methods.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Statistics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1002/sim.10276
Marianthie Wank, Sarah Medley, Roy N Tamura, Thomas M Braun, Kelley M Kidwell
{"title":"A Partially Randomized Patient Preference, Sequential, Multiple-Assignment, Randomized Trial Design Analyzed via Weighted and Replicated Frequentist and Bayesian Methods.","authors":"Marianthie Wank, Sarah Medley, Roy N Tamura, Thomas M Braun, Kelley M Kidwell","doi":"10.1002/sim.10276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Results from randomized control trials (RCTs) may not be representative when individuals refuse to be randomized or are excluded for having a preference for which treatment they receive. If trial designs do not allow for participant treatment preferences, trials can suffer in accrual, adherence, retention, and external validity of results. Thus, there is interest surrounding clinical trial designs that incorporate participant treatment preferences. We propose a Partially Randomized, Patient Preference, Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (PRPP-SMART) which combines a Partially Randomized, Patient Preference (PRPP) design with a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) design. This novel PRPP-SMART design is a multi-stage clinical trial design where, at each stage, participants either receive their preferred treatment, or if they do not have a preferred treatment, they are randomized. This paper focuses on the clinical trial design for PRPP-SMARTs and the development of Bayesian and frequentist weighted and replicated regression models (WRRMs) to analyze data from such trials. We propose a two-stage PRPP-SMART with binary end of stage outcomes and estimate the embedded dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs). Our WRRMs use data from both randomized and non-randomized participants for efficient estimation of the DTR effects. We compare our method to a more traditional PRPP analysis which only considers participants randomized to treatment. Our Bayesian and frequentist methods produce more efficient DTR estimates with negligible bias despite the inclusion of non-randomized participants in the analysis. The proposed PRPP-SMART design and analytic method is a promising approach to incorporate participant treatment preferences into clinical trial design.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Results from randomized control trials (RCTs) may not be representative when individuals refuse to be randomized or are excluded for having a preference for which treatment they receive. If trial designs do not allow for participant treatment preferences, trials can suffer in accrual, adherence, retention, and external validity of results. Thus, there is interest surrounding clinical trial designs that incorporate participant treatment preferences. We propose a Partially Randomized, Patient Preference, Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (PRPP-SMART) which combines a Partially Randomized, Patient Preference (PRPP) design with a Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial (SMART) design. This novel PRPP-SMART design is a multi-stage clinical trial design where, at each stage, participants either receive their preferred treatment, or if they do not have a preferred treatment, they are randomized. This paper focuses on the clinical trial design for PRPP-SMARTs and the development of Bayesian and frequentist weighted and replicated regression models (WRRMs) to analyze data from such trials. We propose a two-stage PRPP-SMART with binary end of stage outcomes and estimate the embedded dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs). Our WRRMs use data from both randomized and non-randomized participants for efficient estimation of the DTR effects. We compare our method to a more traditional PRPP analysis which only considers participants randomized to treatment. Our Bayesian and frequentist methods produce more efficient DTR estimates with negligible bias despite the inclusion of non-randomized participants in the analysis. The proposed PRPP-SMART design and analytic method is a promising approach to incorporate participant treatment preferences into clinical trial design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过加权和重复频数法及贝叶斯法分析的部分随机患者偏好、顺序、多重分配、随机试验设计。
随机对照试验(RCT)的结果可能不具有代表性,因为有些人拒绝接受随机对照,或者因为对接受哪种治疗有偏好而被排除在外。如果试验设计不考虑受试者的治疗偏好,试验就会在累积、依从性、保留率和结果的外部有效性方面受到影响。因此,人们对纳入受试者治疗偏好的临床试验设计很感兴趣。我们提出了部分随机、患者偏好、顺序、多次分配、随机试验(PRPP-SMART),它将部分随机、患者偏好(PRPP)设计与顺序、多次分配、随机试验(SMART)设计相结合。这种新颖的 PRPP-SMART 设计是一种多阶段临床试验设计,在每个阶段,参与者要么接受其首选治疗,要么在没有首选治疗的情况下接受随机治疗。本文主要介绍 PRPP-SMART 的临床试验设计以及贝叶斯和频数主义加权和复制回归模型(WRRM)的开发,以分析此类试验的数据。我们提出了一种具有二进制阶段末结果的两阶段 PRPP-SMART 模型,并估算了内嵌的动态治疗机制 (DTR)。我们的 WRRM 使用随机和非随机参与者的数据来有效估计 DTR 效果。我们将我们的方法与更传统的 PRPP 分析进行了比较,后者只考虑随机接受治疗的参与者。尽管在分析中纳入了非随机参与者,但我们的贝叶斯方法和频数方法仍能产生更有效的 DTR 估计值,且偏差可忽略不计。建议的 PRPP-SMART 设计和分析方法是将参与者治疗偏好纳入临床试验设计的一种很有前途的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
期刊最新文献
A Novel Bayesian Spatio-Temporal Surveillance Metric to Predict Emerging Infectious Disease Areas of High Disease Risk. Does Remdesivir Lower COVID-19 Mortality? A Subgroup Analysis of Hospitalized Adults Receiving Supplemental Oxygen. Modeling Chronic Disease Mortality by Methods From Accelerated Life Testing. A Nonparametric Global Win Probability Approach to the Analysis and Sizing of Randomized Controlled Trials With Multiple Endpoints of Different Scales and Missing Data: Beyond O'Brien-Wei-Lachin. Causal Inference for Continuous Multiple Time Point Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1