Risk evolution analysis of gas leakage accidents based on complex network

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106692
Xuguang Ma , Yun-Ting Tsai , Chi-Min Shu , Yi Yang
{"title":"Risk evolution analysis of gas leakage accidents based on complex network","authors":"Xuguang Ma ,&nbsp;Yun-Ting Tsai ,&nbsp;Chi-Min Shu ,&nbsp;Yi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Toxic gas leakage accidents are catastrophic and thus the subject of considerable attention among researchers, regulators, and companies. Thus, this study constructed a complex network evolution model of hazardous gas leakage accidents. It did so by analysing accident reports to then construct 10 fault trees to, in turn, construct an accident chain with causal linkages. This model comprised 67 nodes and 94 edges and effectively described the progression of such accidents from an event causality perspective. Microscopic and macroscopic analyses of the model revealed critical risk events in the network. Moreover, the comprehensive clustering coefficient (0.052), average path length (4.595), and network diameter (10) were calculated in MATLAB. These metrics were used to identify the shortest disaster paths associated with various prevention and control strategies. This study conducted deliberate attack experiments on the aforementioned network model. The findings of the study indicated the most hazardous events and pathways that are most likely to trigger accidents. These findings aligned with statistical data on accident causes, thereby providing insights for proactive prevention and effective management of gas leaks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 106692"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524002820","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toxic gas leakage accidents are catastrophic and thus the subject of considerable attention among researchers, regulators, and companies. Thus, this study constructed a complex network evolution model of hazardous gas leakage accidents. It did so by analysing accident reports to then construct 10 fault trees to, in turn, construct an accident chain with causal linkages. This model comprised 67 nodes and 94 edges and effectively described the progression of such accidents from an event causality perspective. Microscopic and macroscopic analyses of the model revealed critical risk events in the network. Moreover, the comprehensive clustering coefficient (0.052), average path length (4.595), and network diameter (10) were calculated in MATLAB. These metrics were used to identify the shortest disaster paths associated with various prevention and control strategies. This study conducted deliberate attack experiments on the aforementioned network model. The findings of the study indicated the most hazardous events and pathways that are most likely to trigger accidents. These findings aligned with statistical data on accident causes, thereby providing insights for proactive prevention and effective management of gas leaks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于复杂网络的气体泄漏事故风险演变分析
有毒气体泄漏事故是灾难性的,因此备受研究人员、监管机构和企业的关注。因此,本研究构建了危险气体泄漏事故的复杂网络演化模型。通过分析事故报告,构建了 10 个故障树,进而构建了一个具有因果联系的事故链。该模型由 67 个节点和 94 条边组成,从事件因果关系的角度有效地描述了此类事故的发展过程。对模型的微观和宏观分析揭示了网络中的关键风险事件。此外,还在 MATLAB 中计算了综合聚类系数(0.052)、平均路径长度(4.595)和网络直径(10)。这些指标用于识别与各种防控策略相关的最短灾难路径。本研究对上述网络模型进行了蓄意攻击实验。研究结果表明了最有可能引发事故的最危险事件和路径。这些发现与事故原因的统计数据相吻合,从而为主动预防和有效管理天然气泄漏提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial work conditions and health status of digital platform workers in Taiwan: A mixed method study Risk evolution analysis of gas leakage accidents based on complex network Editorial Board A novel emergency evacuation route optimization model in flood disasters using hydrodynamic model and intelligent algorithm Why train? Compatible and incompatible institutional logics in violence prevention and management training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1