Facilitative interactions promote biodiversity in various ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem management and restoration

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107455
Dongdong Qiu , Yanpeng Zhu , Yueheng Ren , Zhichao Xu , Zhanjun Quan
{"title":"Facilitative interactions promote biodiversity in various ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem management and restoration","authors":"Dongdong Qiu ,&nbsp;Yanpeng Zhu ,&nbsp;Yueheng Ren ,&nbsp;Zhichao Xu ,&nbsp;Zhanjun Quan","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Positive interactions, such as facilitation and mutualism, can promote community construction and maintenance of ecosystem biodiversity and resilience. However, there are few global meta-analyses on whether and how facilitative interactions affect biodiversity indices in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We synthetically reviewed 344 studies of the effects of facilitative interactions on biodiversity, and reviewed and meta-analyzed 177 studies, which contain available data about the effects of facilitative interaction on ecosystem biodiversity, richness, and abundance. The results indicated an upward trend for the number of studies published annually on this topic, particularly after 2010, reflecting an increasing interest in facilitative interactions. Most studies were conducted in North America and Europe, followed by South America, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. Most studies were conducted in marine and coastal ecosystems and grasslands, followed by forests, shrublands, deserts, and inland wetlands. Our meta-analyses showed that facilitative interactions significantly increased the Shannon diversity, species richness, and species abundance in various terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, even if several studies showed non-significant or negative effects. Facilitators promoted species biodiversity mainly by reducing physical or biotic stress, ameliorating harsh environments, spreading pollen, providing shelter, and defending against enemies. We conclude that facilitative interactions are essential in maintaining and promoting the biodiversity of various ecosystems. Thus, the conservation of facilitator species should be a priority, and facilitative interactions should be applied to ecosystem restoration and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107455"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424002805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positive interactions, such as facilitation and mutualism, can promote community construction and maintenance of ecosystem biodiversity and resilience. However, there are few global meta-analyses on whether and how facilitative interactions affect biodiversity indices in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. We synthetically reviewed 344 studies of the effects of facilitative interactions on biodiversity, and reviewed and meta-analyzed 177 studies, which contain available data about the effects of facilitative interaction on ecosystem biodiversity, richness, and abundance. The results indicated an upward trend for the number of studies published annually on this topic, particularly after 2010, reflecting an increasing interest in facilitative interactions. Most studies were conducted in North America and Europe, followed by South America, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. Most studies were conducted in marine and coastal ecosystems and grasslands, followed by forests, shrublands, deserts, and inland wetlands. Our meta-analyses showed that facilitative interactions significantly increased the Shannon diversity, species richness, and species abundance in various terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, even if several studies showed non-significant or negative effects. Facilitators promoted species biodiversity mainly by reducing physical or biotic stress, ameliorating harsh environments, spreading pollen, providing shelter, and defending against enemies. We conclude that facilitative interactions are essential in maintaining and promoting the biodiversity of various ecosystems. Thus, the conservation of facilitator species should be a priority, and facilitative interactions should be applied to ecosystem restoration and management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
促进性相互作用可促进各种生态系统的生物多样性:对生态系统管理和恢复的影响
促进性和互利性等良性互动可促进群落建设,维护生态系统的生物多样性和恢复力。然而,关于促进性相互作用是否以及如何影响陆地和水生生态系统生物多样性指数的全球荟萃分析却很少。我们综合回顾了 344 项关于促进性相互作用对生物多样性影响的研究,并对 177 项研究进行了回顾和荟萃分析,这些研究包含促进性相互作用对生态系统生物多样性、丰富度和丰度影响的可用数据。结果表明,每年发表的有关该主题的研究数量呈上升趋势,尤其是在 2010 年之后,这反映出人们对促进性相互作用的兴趣日益浓厚。大多数研究在北美洲和欧洲进行,其次是南美洲、亚洲、大洋洲和非洲。大多数研究是在海洋和沿海生态系统以及草地上进行的,其次是森林、灌木丛、沙漠和内陆湿地。我们的荟萃分析表明,在各种陆地和水生生态系统中,促进性相互作用显著提高了香农多样性、物种丰富度和物种丰度,即使有几项研究显示了不显著或负面的影响。促进者主要通过减少物理或生物压力、改善恶劣环境、传播花粉、提供庇护所和抵御敌人来促进物种的生物多样性。我们的结论是,促进性相互作用对维持和促进各种生态系统的生物多样性至关重要。因此,应优先保护促进物种,并将促进性相互作用应用于生态系统的恢复和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
期刊最新文献
Nature-based mitigation of shoreline erosion risks in tidal marshes created by managed realignment vs. sediment nourishment Facilitative interactions promote biodiversity in various ecosystems: Implications for ecosystem management and restoration Quantifying restored riparian buffer delineation accuracy and detectability in multitemporal imagery 29 years of carbon sequestration in two constructed riverine wetlands Bio-degradable ‘reef bags’ used for rubble stabilisation and their impact on rubble stability, binding, coral recruitment and fish occupancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1