Impact of boundary layer parameterizations on simulated seasonal meteorology over North-East India

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101505
Neeldip Barman , Sharad Gokhale , Dewashish Tiwari
{"title":"Impact of boundary layer parameterizations on simulated seasonal meteorology over North-East India","authors":"Neeldip Barman ,&nbsp;Sharad Gokhale ,&nbsp;Dewashish Tiwari","doi":"10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the accuracy of six planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes in simulating two different seasons of pre-monsoon and monsoon in India's North-East region through the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Twelve one-month simulations were conducted with the PBL schemes, six each for April (pre-monsoon) and July (monsoon), and the model outputs were compared against observations. Three non-local schemes, Asymmetric Convective Model (ACM2), Yonsei University (YSU), Shin-Hong (HONG), and three local schemes, Quasi Normal Scale Elimination (QNSE), Mellor Yamada Janjic (MYJ) and Mellor Yamada Nakanishi Nino (MYNN3), were tested. The meteorological variables of temperature, relative humidity (RH), wind speed, wind direction, and rainfall were evaluated, and the performance of each scheme for each meteorological variable is reported. The 2 m temperature (T2) variable was well simulated by ACM2, MYJ in April, and YSU in July, while MYNN3 best simulated the 2 m RH (RH2) during both seasons. 10 m wind speed (WS10) and directions (WD10) were better simulated by MYNN3, HONG and YSU. HONG also best-simulated rainfall in April and MYJ in July. April and July being rainfall periods, an analysis of the schemes’ simulated rainfall frequency was also carried out. Moreover, the PBL schemes were also ranked, considering their combined performance with all the above meteorological parameters. While considering both the seasons and all meteorological variables, the scale-aware scheme, HONG, was the best scheme and can be used to simulate both seasons. Additionally, an in-depth analysis of surface and atmospheric parameters was also carried out to reason the simulated meteorology. QNSE expends the highest amount of its surface energy through surface evaporation, leading to the lowest surface skin temperature and T2 predictions. In contrast, MYNN3 produced the lowest mixing, which caused the moistest boundary layer, highest RH, cloud cover, and highly overestimated rainfall. Besides evaluation, which will help to choose a suitable PBL scheme for weather predictions in this region, this study also identifies the characteristics and deficiencies of PBL and surface layer schemes for improvement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50563,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377026524000745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the accuracy of six planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes in simulating two different seasons of pre-monsoon and monsoon in India's North-East region through the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Twelve one-month simulations were conducted with the PBL schemes, six each for April (pre-monsoon) and July (monsoon), and the model outputs were compared against observations. Three non-local schemes, Asymmetric Convective Model (ACM2), Yonsei University (YSU), Shin-Hong (HONG), and three local schemes, Quasi Normal Scale Elimination (QNSE), Mellor Yamada Janjic (MYJ) and Mellor Yamada Nakanishi Nino (MYNN3), were tested. The meteorological variables of temperature, relative humidity (RH), wind speed, wind direction, and rainfall were evaluated, and the performance of each scheme for each meteorological variable is reported. The 2 m temperature (T2) variable was well simulated by ACM2, MYJ in April, and YSU in July, while MYNN3 best simulated the 2 m RH (RH2) during both seasons. 10 m wind speed (WS10) and directions (WD10) were better simulated by MYNN3, HONG and YSU. HONG also best-simulated rainfall in April and MYJ in July. April and July being rainfall periods, an analysis of the schemes’ simulated rainfall frequency was also carried out. Moreover, the PBL schemes were also ranked, considering their combined performance with all the above meteorological parameters. While considering both the seasons and all meteorological variables, the scale-aware scheme, HONG, was the best scheme and can be used to simulate both seasons. Additionally, an in-depth analysis of surface and atmospheric parameters was also carried out to reason the simulated meteorology. QNSE expends the highest amount of its surface energy through surface evaporation, leading to the lowest surface skin temperature and T2 predictions. In contrast, MYNN3 produced the lowest mixing, which caused the moistest boundary layer, highest RH, cloud cover, and highly overestimated rainfall. Besides evaluation, which will help to choose a suitable PBL scheme for weather predictions in this region, this study also identifies the characteristics and deficiencies of PBL and surface layer schemes for improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边界层参数化对印度东北部模拟季节性气象的影响
本研究评估了六种行星边界层(PBL)参数化方案在通过天气研究和预报(WRF)模式模拟印度东北部地区季风前和季风两个不同季节时的准确性。利用 PBL 方案进行了 12 次为期一个月的模拟,其中 4 月(季风前)和 7 月(季风)各 6 次,并将模型输出结果与观测结果进行了比较。测试了三个非本地方案,即非对称对流模式(ACM2)、延世大学(YSU)、 Shin-Hong(HONG),以及三个本地方案,即准正常尺度消除(QNSE)、Mellor Yamada Janjic(MYJ)和 Mellor Yamada Nakanishi Nino(MYNN3)。对温度、相对湿度 (RH)、风速、风向和降雨量等气象变量进行了评估,并报告了各方案对各气象变量的性能。ACM2 和 MYJ 分别在 4 月和 7 月对 2 米温度 (T2) 变量和 YSU 进行了良好的模拟,而 MYNN3 则在这两个季节对 2 米相对湿度 (RH2) 进行了最佳模拟。MYNN3、HONG 和 YSU 对 10 米风速(WS10)和风向(WD10)的模拟效果更好。此外,HONG 对 4 月降雨量的模拟效果最佳,MYJ 对 7 月降雨量的模拟效果最佳。由于四月和七月是降雨多发期,因此还对各方案模拟的降雨频率进行了分析。此外,还对后海灣幹线方案进行了排名,考虑了它们在上述所有气象参数下的综合表现。在考虑两个季节和所有气象变量的情况下,规模感知方案 HONG 是最佳方案,可用于模拟两个季节。此外,还对地表和大气参数进行了深入分析,以对模拟气象进行推理。QNSE 通过地表蒸发消耗的地表能量最高,导致地表表皮温度和 T2 预测值最低。相比之下,MYNN3 产生的混合最少,导致边界层最潮湿、相对湿度最高、云量最多,降雨量被高估。除了评估有助于为该地区的天气预报选择合适的 PBL 方案外,本研究还指出了 PBL 和表层方案的特点和不足之处,以供改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans
Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans is an international journal for research related to the dynamical and physical processes governing atmospheres, oceans and climate. Authors are invited to submit articles, short contributions or scholarly reviews in the following areas: •Dynamic meteorology •Physical oceanography •Geophysical fluid dynamics •Climate variability and climate change •Atmosphere-ocean-biosphere-cryosphere interactions •Prediction and predictability •Scale interactions Papers of theoretical, computational, experimental and observational investigations are invited, particularly those that explore the fundamental nature - or bring together the interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary aspects - of dynamical and physical processes at all scales. Papers that explore air-sea interactions and the coupling between atmospheres, oceans, and other components of the climate system are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Impact of boundary layer parameterizations on simulated seasonal meteorology over North-East India Mapping the dynamics of global sea surface nitrate using ocean color data The vortex splitting process from interaction between a mesoscale vortex and two islands The curious case of a strong relationship between ENSO and Indian summer monsoon in CFSv2 model Study on the genesis and development trend of tropical depressions under different large-scale backgrounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1