Systematic review: Impact of juvenile incarceration

E. Ackerman, J. Magram, T.D. Kennedy
{"title":"Systematic review: Impact of juvenile incarceration","authors":"E. Ackerman,&nbsp;J. Magram,&nbsp;T.D. Kennedy","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2024.100083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The juvenile justice system was established with the intent of rehabilitation (Fagan &amp; Zimring, 2000). However, despite these intentions, the reality of juvenile incarceration is that it often fails in this rehabilitative process, with numerous studies highlighting the adverse outcomes associated with confinement (Lambie &amp; Randell, 2013; Gatti et al., 2009).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate current knowledge and provide a comprehensive understanding of how juvenile incarceration affects various domains of life including mental and physical health, adaptive functioning, educational attainment, employment, and recidivism.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Many of the studies reviewed used samples from larger longitudinal projects (1970s-2000s) and were later filtered to focus on individuals incarcerated during adolescence. Additionally, some studies included a broader range of participants with any justice system contact, such as arrests, serving as a useful comparison group to those incarcerated.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to conduct our review (PRISMA; Moher et al., 2009). A modified checklist was used to outline the inclusion and exclusion criteria for individual studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two electronic databases were searched, including PsycINFO and PubMed/MEDLINE. Thirty-four full-text articles were reviewed for quality, and sixteen were excluded due to either the (a) sample population, (b) lack of statistical outcomes, or (c) omission of the association between juvenile incarceration and outcomes. Guided by methodological quality criteria, eighteen studies were included in the review.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Juvenile incarceration and subsequent interactions that occur within correctional settings, create a cascading effect that shape long-term trajectories often marked by diminished opportunities for positive development and an increase in adverse outcomes. The findings of this review underscore the systemic challenges and shortcomings within the juvenile justice system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The juvenile justice system was established with the intent of rehabilitation (Fagan & Zimring, 2000). However, despite these intentions, the reality of juvenile incarceration is that it often fails in this rehabilitative process, with numerous studies highlighting the adverse outcomes associated with confinement (Lambie & Randell, 2013; Gatti et al., 2009).

Objective

The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate current knowledge and provide a comprehensive understanding of how juvenile incarceration affects various domains of life including mental and physical health, adaptive functioning, educational attainment, employment, and recidivism.

Participants

Many of the studies reviewed used samples from larger longitudinal projects (1970s-2000s) and were later filtered to focus on individuals incarcerated during adolescence. Additionally, some studies included a broader range of participants with any justice system contact, such as arrests, serving as a useful comparison group to those incarcerated.

Method

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed to conduct our review (PRISMA; Moher et al., 2009). A modified checklist was used to outline the inclusion and exclusion criteria for individual studies.

Results

Two electronic databases were searched, including PsycINFO and PubMed/MEDLINE. Thirty-four full-text articles were reviewed for quality, and sixteen were excluded due to either the (a) sample population, (b) lack of statistical outcomes, or (c) omission of the association between juvenile incarceration and outcomes. Guided by methodological quality criteria, eighteen studies were included in the review.

Conclusions

Juvenile incarceration and subsequent interactions that occur within correctional settings, create a cascading effect that shape long-term trajectories often marked by diminished opportunities for positive development and an increase in adverse outcomes. The findings of this review underscore the systemic challenges and shortcomings within the juvenile justice system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾:青少年监禁的影响
背景建立少年司法系统的初衷是为了让他们改过自新(Fagan & Zimring, 2000)。然而,尽管有这些意图,青少年监禁的现实情况是,它往往无法实现这一改造过程,许多研究都强调了与监禁相关的不良后果(Lambie & Randell, 2013; Gatti et al、本系统综述旨在整合现有知识,全面了解青少年监禁如何影响生活的各个领域,包括身心健康、适应功能、教育程度、就业和累犯。此外,一些研究的参与者范围更广,他们与司法系统有任何接触,如被捕,可作为被监禁者的有用对比组。方法在进行综述时,我们遵循了《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA;Moher 等,2009 年)指南。结果检索了两个电子数据库,包括 PsycINFO 和 PubMed/MEDLINE。对 34 篇全文进行了质量审查,其中 16 篇因以下原因被排除在外:(a)样本人群;(b)缺乏统计结果;或(c)忽略了青少年监禁与结果之间的关联。在方法质量标准的指导下,18 项研究被纳入综述。结论青少年监禁以及随后在惩教环境中发生的互动会产生连带效应,形成长期轨迹,其特点往往是积极发展的机会减少,不良后果增加。本研究的结论强调了少年司法系统中存在的系统性挑战和缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic review: Impact of juvenile incarceration Attitudes towards parents with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in child protection settings Silent group sandplay activates healing How could you help me? Children's voices on violence in child welfare files: A thematic analysis The use of technology and mobile health apps in child maltreatment interventions: Perspectives of TF-CBT therapists and SafeCare providers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1