Gabriela Soares Macello Ramos, Fernanda de Sousa Bezerra, Roberta Nogueira Pereira da Silva, Matheus Grilo de Oliveira Carvalho, Maria Gabriela Bello Koblitz
{"title":"Evaluating spectrophotometric and antioxidant activity methods for phenolic compounds quantification in natural deep eutectic solvents","authors":"Gabriela Soares Macello Ramos, Fernanda de Sousa Bezerra, Roberta Nogueira Pereira da Silva, Matheus Grilo de Oliveira Carvalho, Maria Gabriela Bello Koblitz","doi":"10.1016/j.molliq.2024.126375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural deep eutectic solvents (NaDES) are a new generation of sustainable solvents with unique physicochemical properties derived from their natural composition. This study addressed the accuracy of spectrophotometric analytical methods in quantifying phenolic compounds, namely chlorogenic acid, in NaDES, both as a standard and as part of more complex natural extracts. Comparative analyses of different quantification methods were conducted, using HPLC as the reference, revealing the influence of solvent components on the accuracy of results. Pearson’s correlation was evaluated between the colorimetric and chromatographic methods through the comparison of standard curves. The Folin-Ciocalteu reagent method was highlighted as the most correlated with the reference method in NaDES composed of lactic acid, while the Fast Blue BB method was noted for NaDES composed of glycerol, both with Pearson’s R values greater than 0.99. Variations in pH and solvent composition affected the sensitivity of the spectrophotometric methods, requiring a customized approach for each solvent. However, when spectrophotometric methods were applied to sunflower meal extracts, none, not even when antioxidant activity evaluation methods were used, was able to replicate the order of extraction efficiency revealed by the HPLC analysis, namely: AL:G > EtOH > CC:GL > U:GL > B:AL. The best results were achieved – correctly identifying the two best extraction solvents – when a solvent-directed method was used to analyze each extract, which resulted in extracts containing 3,075.78 μg CGA mL<sup>−1</sup> AL:G and 2,384.83 μg CGA mL<sup>−1</sup> EtOH, but also 2,002.67 μg CGA mL<sup>−1</sup> B:AL; 1,488.68 μg CGA mL<sup>−1</sup> U:GL and 579,14 μg CGA mL<sup>−1</sup> CC:GL. This study contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges associated with the spectrophotometric analysis of phenolic compounds in NaDES, highlighting the need to select the right analytical method for each different solvent formulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Liquids","volume":"415 ","pages":"Article 126375"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Liquids","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167732224024346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Natural deep eutectic solvents (NaDES) are a new generation of sustainable solvents with unique physicochemical properties derived from their natural composition. This study addressed the accuracy of spectrophotometric analytical methods in quantifying phenolic compounds, namely chlorogenic acid, in NaDES, both as a standard and as part of more complex natural extracts. Comparative analyses of different quantification methods were conducted, using HPLC as the reference, revealing the influence of solvent components on the accuracy of results. Pearson’s correlation was evaluated between the colorimetric and chromatographic methods through the comparison of standard curves. The Folin-Ciocalteu reagent method was highlighted as the most correlated with the reference method in NaDES composed of lactic acid, while the Fast Blue BB method was noted for NaDES composed of glycerol, both with Pearson’s R values greater than 0.99. Variations in pH and solvent composition affected the sensitivity of the spectrophotometric methods, requiring a customized approach for each solvent. However, when spectrophotometric methods were applied to sunflower meal extracts, none, not even when antioxidant activity evaluation methods were used, was able to replicate the order of extraction efficiency revealed by the HPLC analysis, namely: AL:G > EtOH > CC:GL > U:GL > B:AL. The best results were achieved – correctly identifying the two best extraction solvents – when a solvent-directed method was used to analyze each extract, which resulted in extracts containing 3,075.78 μg CGA mL−1 AL:G and 2,384.83 μg CGA mL−1 EtOH, but also 2,002.67 μg CGA mL−1 B:AL; 1,488.68 μg CGA mL−1 U:GL and 579,14 μg CGA mL−1 CC:GL. This study contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges associated with the spectrophotometric analysis of phenolic compounds in NaDES, highlighting the need to select the right analytical method for each different solvent formulation.
期刊介绍:
The journal includes papers in the following areas:
– Simple organic liquids and mixtures
– Ionic liquids
– Surfactant solutions (including micelles and vesicles) and liquid interfaces
– Colloidal solutions and nanoparticles
– Thermotropic and lyotropic liquid crystals
– Ferrofluids
– Water, aqueous solutions and other hydrogen-bonded liquids
– Lubricants, polymer solutions and melts
– Molten metals and salts
– Phase transitions and critical phenomena in liquids and confined fluids
– Self assembly in complex liquids.– Biomolecules in solution
The emphasis is on the molecular (or microscopic) understanding of particular liquids or liquid systems, especially concerning structure, dynamics and intermolecular forces. The experimental techniques used may include:
– Conventional spectroscopy (mid-IR and far-IR, Raman, NMR, etc.)
– Non-linear optics and time resolved spectroscopy (psec, fsec, asec, ISRS, etc.)
– Light scattering (Rayleigh, Brillouin, PCS, etc.)
– Dielectric relaxation
– X-ray and neutron scattering and diffraction.
Experimental studies, computer simulations (MD or MC) and analytical theory will be considered for publication; papers just reporting experimental results that do not contribute to the understanding of the fundamentals of molecular and ionic liquids will not be accepted. Only papers of a non-routine nature and advancing the field will be considered for publication.