Dwell time shaping in inverse treatment planning for cervical brachytherapy

Frida Dohlmar , Björn Morén , Michael Sandborg , Torbjörn Larsson , Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
{"title":"Dwell time shaping in inverse treatment planning for cervical brachytherapy","authors":"Frida Dohlmar ,&nbsp;Björn Morén ,&nbsp;Michael Sandborg ,&nbsp;Torbjörn Larsson ,&nbsp;Åsa Carlsson Tedgren","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Manual treatment planning for cervical brachytherapy is a challenging task; therefore, we investigated a method for inverse treatment planning using pseudo-structures to control the dwell distribution. Our hypothesis was that this method could produce treatment plans with a pear-shaped dose distribution and a high central dose, that comply with clinical constraints.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Data from 16 previously treated patients were used to compare three treatment planning methods: i) manual, ii) straightforward inverse, and iii) inverse with pseudo-structures. The treatment plans were compared using dose-volume histogram parameters and by analysing the dwell times, and the distribution of total reference air-kerma (TRAK) in the different parts of the applicator. Methods were evaluated in one treatment planning system and verified in a second treatment planning system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The median dose to 90 % of the clinical tumor volume was 7.6 Gy, 7.8 Gy and 8.1 Gy for manual, pseudo-structure and straightforward methods respectively. Distribution of TRAK for the different parts of the applicator for the three methods (manual, pseudo-structures, and straightforward), with combined intracavitary and interstitial treatments, were for vaginal part 39 %, 33 % and 15 %, for intra-uterine part 47 %, 50 % and 47 % and for interstitial part 13 %, 17 % and 38 % respectively. The results were similar in the second treatment planning system.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The developed pseudo-structures worked as intended in shaping the dwell time distribution and in meeting the clinical constraints for both investigated treatment planning systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100672"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Manual treatment planning for cervical brachytherapy is a challenging task; therefore, we investigated a method for inverse treatment planning using pseudo-structures to control the dwell distribution. Our hypothesis was that this method could produce treatment plans with a pear-shaped dose distribution and a high central dose, that comply with clinical constraints.

Materials and methods

Data from 16 previously treated patients were used to compare three treatment planning methods: i) manual, ii) straightforward inverse, and iii) inverse with pseudo-structures. The treatment plans were compared using dose-volume histogram parameters and by analysing the dwell times, and the distribution of total reference air-kerma (TRAK) in the different parts of the applicator. Methods were evaluated in one treatment planning system and verified in a second treatment planning system.

Results

The median dose to 90 % of the clinical tumor volume was 7.6 Gy, 7.8 Gy and 8.1 Gy for manual, pseudo-structure and straightforward methods respectively. Distribution of TRAK for the different parts of the applicator for the three methods (manual, pseudo-structures, and straightforward), with combined intracavitary and interstitial treatments, were for vaginal part 39 %, 33 % and 15 %, for intra-uterine part 47 %, 50 % and 47 % and for interstitial part 13 %, 17 % and 38 % respectively. The results were similar in the second treatment planning system.

Conclusion

The developed pseudo-structures worked as intended in shaping the dwell time distribution and in meeting the clinical constraints for both investigated treatment planning systems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈近距离放射治疗反向治疗规划中的停留时间整形
背景和目的宫颈近距离放射治疗的手动治疗计划是一项具有挑战性的任务;因此,我们研究了一种使用伪结构控制驻留分布的反向治疗计划方法。我们的假设是,这种方法可以产生梨形剂量分布和高中心剂量的治疗计划,并符合临床限制条件。材料和方法使用 16 名先前接受过治疗的患者的数据,比较三种治疗计划方法:i) 手动;ii) 直接反向;iii) 使用伪结构的反向。使用剂量-体积直方图参数,并通过分析停留时间和涂抹器不同部位的总参考空气热玛(TRAK)分布,对治疗计划进行比较。结果90%临床肿瘤体积的中位剂量分别为7.6 Gy、7.8 Gy和8.1 Gy。在三种方法(手动、伪结构和直接)中,结合腔内和间质治疗的不同部位的 TRAK 分布情况分别为:阴道部位 39%、33% 和 15%,宫腔内部位 47%、50% 和 47%,间质部位 13%、17% 和 38%。在第二种治疗计划系统中,结果与此类似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography Technical feasibility of delivering a simultaneous integrated boost in partial breast irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1