Household evacuation decision making during simultaneous events: Hurricane Ida and the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 4.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International journal of disaster risk reduction Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104914
Laura K. Siebeneck , Zengxiang Lei , Prabin Sharma , Rajat Verma , Mac Osazuwa-Peters , Satish V. Ukkusuri
{"title":"Household evacuation decision making during simultaneous events: Hurricane Ida and the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Laura K. Siebeneck ,&nbsp;Zengxiang Lei ,&nbsp;Prabin Sharma ,&nbsp;Rajat Verma ,&nbsp;Mac Osazuwa-Peters ,&nbsp;Satish V. Ukkusuri","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protective action decisions are complex and require households to consider a variety of factors including hazard risks, household characteristics, location, and experience. Previous research has examined these decisions in the context of a single hazard; however, it is also necessary to consider scenarios whereby two coupled hazards pose simultaneous risks. This paper examines the decision-making of households when making evacuation and shelter-in-place decisions during two simultaneous events: the 2021 Hurricane Ida and the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey data gathered from six parishes eight months after the storm were used to analyze risk perception tradeoffs and protective action decisions of households before Hurricane Ida made landfall. The results indicate that higher perceived risks of the hurricane causing injury or death, being vaccinated, having a higher income, having children residing in the home, and having previous experience of evacuating increased the odds of evacuating. Likewise, variables such as higher perceived risks related to being hospitalized or killed by COVID-19, being elderly, and being located further away from the storm track all decreased the likelihood of a household undertaking evacuation. The findings of this study improve understanding of how households consider competing risks during simultaneous hazard events, which in turn can help inform strategies for managing future disaster events involving multiple hazards and risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 104914"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924006769","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protective action decisions are complex and require households to consider a variety of factors including hazard risks, household characteristics, location, and experience. Previous research has examined these decisions in the context of a single hazard; however, it is also necessary to consider scenarios whereby two coupled hazards pose simultaneous risks. This paper examines the decision-making of households when making evacuation and shelter-in-place decisions during two simultaneous events: the 2021 Hurricane Ida and the COVID-19 pandemic. Survey data gathered from six parishes eight months after the storm were used to analyze risk perception tradeoffs and protective action decisions of households before Hurricane Ida made landfall. The results indicate that higher perceived risks of the hurricane causing injury or death, being vaccinated, having a higher income, having children residing in the home, and having previous experience of evacuating increased the odds of evacuating. Likewise, variables such as higher perceived risks related to being hospitalized or killed by COVID-19, being elderly, and being located further away from the storm track all decreased the likelihood of a household undertaking evacuation. The findings of this study improve understanding of how households consider competing risks during simultaneous hazard events, which in turn can help inform strategies for managing future disaster events involving multiple hazards and risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时发生事件时的家庭疏散决策:伊达飓风和 COVID-19 大流行
保护行动决策非常复杂,需要家庭考虑多种因素,包括灾害风险、家庭特征、地点和经验。以往的研究都是在单一灾害的背景下对这些决策进行研究,但也有必要考虑两种耦合灾害同时带来风险的情况。本文研究了家庭在 2021 年飓风 "艾达 "和 COVID-19 大流行这两个同时发生的事件中做出疏散和就地避难决策时的决策情况。在风暴发生八个月后从六个教区收集的调查数据被用来分析飓风 "艾达 "登陆前家庭的风险认知权衡和保护行动决策。结果表明,对飓风造成人员伤亡的风险感知较高、接种过疫苗、收入较高、家中有孩子以及有过撤离经验的家庭会增加撤离的几率。同样,认为 COVID-19 会导致住院或死亡的风险较高、年长者、距离风暴轨道较远等变量都会降低家庭撤离的可能性。这项研究的结果加深了人们对家庭在同时发生灾害事件时如何考虑相互竞争的风险的理解,这反过来又有助于为未来涉及多种灾害和风险的灾害事件的管理策略提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of disaster risk reduction
International journal of disaster risk reduction GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.00%
发文量
688
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international. Key topics:- -multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters -the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques -discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels -disasters associated with climate change -vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends -emerging risks -resilience against disasters. The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of tangible coastal inundation damage related to critical infrastructure and buildings: The case of Mauritius Island Geospatial analysis of alarmingly increasing flood vulnerability and disaster risk within the northeast himalaya region of India Cues facilitating collective sensemaking during emergencies: Gaps, inconsistencies, and indicators Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of flood resilience in Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration Urban flood hazard insights from multiple perspectives based on internet of things sensor data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1