A geographic multi-scale machine learning framework for predicting solar irradiation on tilted surfaces

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133767
Sameer Al-Dahidi , Bilal Rinchi , Raghad Dababseh , Osama Ayadi , Mohammad Alrbai
{"title":"A geographic multi-scale machine learning framework for predicting solar irradiation on tilted surfaces","authors":"Sameer Al-Dahidi ,&nbsp;Bilal Rinchi ,&nbsp;Raghad Dababseh ,&nbsp;Osama Ayadi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Alrbai","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2024.133767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study addresses the challenge of improving Global Tilted Irradiation (GTI) predictions, with Jordan serving as the case study. The novelty of the work lies in developing machine learning models that predict GTI at national, regional (3 regions), and city-specific (12 cities) levels, a previously unexplored approach in the literature. The research examines the comparative efficiency of using a single model for an entire country versus tailored models for individual regions and cities, shedding light on the trade-offs in model evaluation. Various regression models, including Neural Networks (NNs), Linear Regression (LR), Regression Trees (RTs), Ensemble of Regression Trees (ERTs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Kernel Approximation, were evaluated using performance metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>). NNs consistently performed best, achieving the lowest RMSE (1.5787 kWh/m<sup>2</sup>) and highest R<sup>2</sup> (99.8600 %) at the regional level. Sensitivity analysis further explored the impact of different time resolutions, revealing that monthly data outperformed daily data in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. Ultimately, we conclude that region-specific models and monthly data resolution are optimal for practical GTI prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"313 ","pages":"Article 133767"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422403545X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of improving Global Tilted Irradiation (GTI) predictions, with Jordan serving as the case study. The novelty of the work lies in developing machine learning models that predict GTI at national, regional (3 regions), and city-specific (12 cities) levels, a previously unexplored approach in the literature. The research examines the comparative efficiency of using a single model for an entire country versus tailored models for individual regions and cities, shedding light on the trade-offs in model evaluation. Various regression models, including Neural Networks (NNs), Linear Regression (LR), Regression Trees (RTs), Ensemble of Regression Trees (ERTs), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Kernel Approximation, were evaluated using performance metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R2). NNs consistently performed best, achieving the lowest RMSE (1.5787 kWh/m2) and highest R2 (99.8600 %) at the regional level. Sensitivity analysis further explored the impact of different time resolutions, revealing that monthly data outperformed daily data in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. Ultimately, we conclude that region-specific models and monthly data resolution are optimal for practical GTI prediction.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于预测倾斜表面太阳辐照的地理多尺度机器学习框架
本研究以约旦为案例,探讨了改进全球倾斜辐照(GTI)预测的挑战。这项工作的新颖之处在于开发了机器学习模型,可在国家、地区(3 个地区)和城市(12 个城市)层面预测全球倾斜辐照度,这是此前文献中尚未探索过的方法。该研究考察了针对整个国家使用单一模型与针对个别地区和城市使用定制模型的效率比较,从而揭示了模型评估中的权衡问题。研究利用均方根误差 (RMSE)、平均绝对误差 (MAE)、平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 和判定系数 (R2) 等性能指标对各种回归模型进行了评估,包括神经网络 (NN)、线性回归 (LR)、回归树 (RT)、回归树集合 (ERT)、支持向量机 (SVM) 和核逼近模型。NN 始终表现最佳,在区域层面实现了最低的 RMSE(1.5787 kWh/m2)和最高的 R2(99.8600 %)。敏感性分析进一步探讨了不同时间分辨率的影响,结果表明月度数据在准确性和计算效率方面优于日度数据。最终,我们得出结论,针对特定地区的模型和月度数据分辨率是实际 GTI 预测的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
期刊最新文献
High temperature heat pumps for industrial heating processes using water as refrigerant Exploration on deep pulverized coal activation and ultra-low NOx emission strategies with novel purifying-combustion technology Collaborative strategy towards a resilient urban energy system: Evidence from a tripartite evolutionary game model Household, sociodemographic, building and land cover factors affecting residential summer electricity consumption: A systematic statistical study in Phoenix, AZ Economic benefits for the metallurgical industry from co-combusting pyrolysis gas from waste
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1