Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factors analysis based on optimal spatial scales in Luan River Basin, China

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecological Indicators Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112821
Nijuan Yang , Ting Zhang , Jianzhu Li , Ping Feng , Nina Yang
{"title":"Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factors analysis based on optimal spatial scales in Luan River Basin, China","authors":"Nijuan Yang ,&nbsp;Ting Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianzhu Li ,&nbsp;Ping Feng ,&nbsp;Nina Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization and human activities have significantly influenced landscape ecological pattern and increased ecological risk. Landscape ecological risk (LER) assessment serves as an effective tool to capture the effects of natural evolution and human activities on ecosystems comprehensively, but the assessment result is subject to spatial scales. This paper figured out the optimal spatial scales of the Luan River Basin integrating response curves, area accuracy loss model, and semi-variation function under the appropriate resampling method. The improved landscape ecological risk index (ILERI) model was established to assess LER based on optimal spatial scales, employing spatial autocorrelation theory and Geodetector to reveal the spatio-temporal traits and influencing factors of LER. The results showed: (1) Nearest is the appropriate raster resampling method in landscape pattern analysis of Luan River Basin, and the optimal spatial granularity and amplitude are 30 m and 3200 m, respectively; (2) In 2000, 2008, 2016 and 2022, ILERI was 0.242, 0.249, 0.250 and 0.234, respectively, and LER levels were medium–low and medium predominantly, which accounted for 64.87 %, 52.28 %, 68.76 % and 70.55 %; (3) Recent data showed a decline in LER levels, with higher risks concentrated in the northwest and lower risks in the southeast. Precipitation, population density, and primary industry were the primary factors and the interaction of multiple factors played a more significant role. This study will provide reference for planning land use and managing ecological environment in the Luan River Basin.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 112821"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24012780","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and human activities have significantly influenced landscape ecological pattern and increased ecological risk. Landscape ecological risk (LER) assessment serves as an effective tool to capture the effects of natural evolution and human activities on ecosystems comprehensively, but the assessment result is subject to spatial scales. This paper figured out the optimal spatial scales of the Luan River Basin integrating response curves, area accuracy loss model, and semi-variation function under the appropriate resampling method. The improved landscape ecological risk index (ILERI) model was established to assess LER based on optimal spatial scales, employing spatial autocorrelation theory and Geodetector to reveal the spatio-temporal traits and influencing factors of LER. The results showed: (1) Nearest is the appropriate raster resampling method in landscape pattern analysis of Luan River Basin, and the optimal spatial granularity and amplitude are 30 m and 3200 m, respectively; (2) In 2000, 2008, 2016 and 2022, ILERI was 0.242, 0.249, 0.250 and 0.234, respectively, and LER levels were medium–low and medium predominantly, which accounted for 64.87 %, 52.28 %, 68.76 % and 70.55 %; (3) Recent data showed a decline in LER levels, with higher risks concentrated in the northwest and lower risks in the southeast. Precipitation, population density, and primary industry were the primary factors and the interaction of multiple factors played a more significant role. This study will provide reference for planning land use and managing ecological environment in the Luan River Basin.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于最佳空间尺度的中国滦河流域景观生态风险评估及驱动因素分析
快速城市化和人类活动极大地影响了景观生态格局,增加了生态风险。景观生态风险评估是全面把握自然演化和人类活动对生态系统影响的有效工具,但评估结果受空间尺度的制约。本文在适当的重采样方法下,综合响应曲线、面积精度损失模型和半变异函数,找出了滦河流域的最佳空间尺度。建立了基于最优空间尺度的改进景观生态风险指数(ILERI)模型,利用空间自相关理论和 Geodetector 揭示了 LER 的时空特征和影响因素。结果表明(1)在滦河流域景观格局分析中,Nearest是合适的栅格重采样方法,最佳空间粒度和振幅分别为30 m和3200 m;(2)2000年、2008年、2016年和2022年,ILERI分别为0.242、0.249、0.250和0.234,LER 水平以中低和中等为主,分别占 64.87%、52.28%、68.76%和 70.55%;(3)近期数据显示,LER 水平有所下降,风险较高的地区集中在西北部,风险较低的地区集中在东南部。降水、人口密度和第一产业是主要因素,多种因素的交互作用发挥了更重要的作用。本研究将为滦河流域土地利用规划和生态环境治理提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
期刊最新文献
Urban forest indicator assessment for nature-based solutions to connect biodiversity and people Drivers of prehistoric cultural evolution in the Chengdu Plain: Fire events and environmental changes during the middle and late Holocene A novel integrated socio-ecological-economic index for assessing heat health risk Long-term water quality dynamics and trend assessment reveal the effectiveness of ecological compensation: Insights from China’s first cross-provincial compensation watershed Tracking ecosystem stability across boreal Siberia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1