Development of a digital Net-Map tool to analyse multi-stakeholder networks in risk analysis of emerging food safety issues

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Control Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110975
Niels van der Linden , Celine Meerpoel , Hanna Schebesta , Pieternel Luning
{"title":"Development of a digital Net-Map tool to analyse multi-stakeholder networks in risk analysis of emerging food safety issues","authors":"Niels van der Linden ,&nbsp;Celine Meerpoel ,&nbsp;Hanna Schebesta ,&nbsp;Pieternel Luning","doi":"10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The circular economy brings sustainability benefits but also causes potential food safety issues as recycling can introduce new contaminants to food contact materials. These circular food safety issues cause changes in the risk analysis network. So far, social network analysis studies relevant to food safety investigated specific parts of the risk analysis network (such as risk assessment) and its formal stakeholders such as Food Safety Authorities. However, the risk analysis network also consists informal stakeholders, each with their own knowledge and views. A comprehensive analysis of risk analysis networks addressing circularity-related food safety issues from a multi-stakeholder perspective is yet lacking. This study aimed to explore the complex risk analysis network for paper recycling in Belgium. An adjusted and digitalised network mapping methodology, Net-Mapping, was developed to identify the stakeholders, to assess their goals and influence, to determine the different linkages types between them, and to elicit constraints. Forty-one identified stakeholders from science, policy, and society were interconnected through four linkage types (‘legally required information sharing’, ‘voluntary information sharing’, ‘data generation request’, and ‘public communication’). Results show federal policy stakeholders are central in all networks, whereas science and society stakeholders gain influence in the informal networks. Barriers hindering collaboration in the networks are a lack of data and challenges in information exchange. The Net-Mapping insights can assist scientists in gathering risk assessment data, guide policymakers in targeting interventions, and raise stakeholder awareness of collaborations. Future research could compare risk analysis networks across countries for the same food safety issue, or examine the risk analysis networks for different food safety issues in the same country.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":319,"journal":{"name":"Food Control","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 110975"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Control","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956713524006923","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The circular economy brings sustainability benefits but also causes potential food safety issues as recycling can introduce new contaminants to food contact materials. These circular food safety issues cause changes in the risk analysis network. So far, social network analysis studies relevant to food safety investigated specific parts of the risk analysis network (such as risk assessment) and its formal stakeholders such as Food Safety Authorities. However, the risk analysis network also consists informal stakeholders, each with their own knowledge and views. A comprehensive analysis of risk analysis networks addressing circularity-related food safety issues from a multi-stakeholder perspective is yet lacking. This study aimed to explore the complex risk analysis network for paper recycling in Belgium. An adjusted and digitalised network mapping methodology, Net-Mapping, was developed to identify the stakeholders, to assess their goals and influence, to determine the different linkages types between them, and to elicit constraints. Forty-one identified stakeholders from science, policy, and society were interconnected through four linkage types (‘legally required information sharing’, ‘voluntary information sharing’, ‘data generation request’, and ‘public communication’). Results show federal policy stakeholders are central in all networks, whereas science and society stakeholders gain influence in the informal networks. Barriers hindering collaboration in the networks are a lack of data and challenges in information exchange. The Net-Mapping insights can assist scientists in gathering risk assessment data, guide policymakers in targeting interventions, and raise stakeholder awareness of collaborations. Future research could compare risk analysis networks across countries for the same food safety issue, or examine the risk analysis networks for different food safety issues in the same country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发数字网络地图工具,分析新食品安全问题风险分析中的多方利益相关者网络
循环经济带来了可持续发展的好处,但也带来了潜在的食品安全问题,因为循环利用会给食品接触材料带来新的污染物。这些循环食品安全问题会导致风险分析网络发生变化。迄今为止,与食品安全有关的社会网络分析研究调查了风险分析网络的特定部分(如风险评估)及其正式利益相关者(如食品安全当局)。然而,风险分析网络还包括非正式的利益相关者,每个人都有自己的知识和观点。目前还缺乏从多方利益相关者的角度对解决循环相关食品安全问题的风险分析网络进行全面分析。本研究旨在探索比利时纸张回收的复杂风险分析网络。研究开发了一种经过调整和数字化的网络制图方法--网络制图,以确定利益相关者,评估他们的目标和影响,确定他们之间的不同联系类型,并找出制约因素。通过四种联系类型("法律要求的信息共享"、"自愿信息共享"、"数据生成请求 "和 "公共交流"),确定了来自科学、政策和社会的 41 个利益相关者。结果显示,联邦政策利益相关者在所有网络中都处于核心地位,而科学和社会利益相关者则在非正式网络中获得影响力。阻碍网络合作的障碍是缺乏数据和信息交流方面的挑战。网络地图的见解可以帮助科学家收集风险评估数据,指导政策制定者有针对性地采取干预措施,并提高利益相关者对合作的认识。未来的研究可以比较各国针对同一食品安全问题的风险分析网络,或研究同一国家针对不同食品安全问题的风险分析网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Control
Food Control 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Food Control is an international journal that provides essential information for those involved in food safety and process control. Food Control covers the below areas that relate to food process control or to food safety of human foods: • Microbial food safety and antimicrobial systems • Mycotoxins • Hazard analysis, HACCP and food safety objectives • Risk assessment, including microbial and chemical hazards • Quality assurance • Good manufacturing practices • Food process systems design and control • Food Packaging technology and materials in contact with foods • Rapid methods of analysis and detection, including sensor technology • Codes of practice, legislation and international harmonization • Consumer issues • Education, training and research needs. The scope of Food Control is comprehensive and includes original research papers, authoritative reviews, short communications, comment articles that report on new developments in food control, and position papers.
期刊最新文献
Characterization and coating application of composite gelatin packaging containing eucalyptus leaf essential oil liposome and phage endolysin for preservation of pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) Fenton-like catalytic MOFs driving electrochemical aptasensing toward tracking lead pollution in pomegranate fruit Application of high-hydrostatic pressure to extend shelf life of miso-marinated escolar loins during cold storage Editorial Board A closer look at infant food safety: A comprehensive review comparing contaminants across different food sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1