Predicting tensile and fracture parameters in polypropylene-based nanocomposites using machine learning with sensitivity analysis and feature impact evaluation

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES Composites Part C Open Access Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100535
Pouya Rajaee , Faramarz Ashenai Ghasemi , Amir Hossein Rabiee , Mohammad Fasihi , Behnam Kakeh , Alireza Sadeghi
{"title":"Predicting tensile and fracture parameters in polypropylene-based nanocomposites using machine learning with sensitivity analysis and feature impact evaluation","authors":"Pouya Rajaee ,&nbsp;Faramarz Ashenai Ghasemi ,&nbsp;Amir Hossein Rabiee ,&nbsp;Mohammad Fasihi ,&nbsp;Behnam Kakeh ,&nbsp;Alireza Sadeghi","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2024.100535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the efficacy of decision tree and AdaBoost algorithms in predicting mechanical and fracture parameters of polypropylene nanocomposites toughened with ethylene-based and propylene-based thermoplastic elastomers and reinforced with fumed silica and halloysite nanotube nanoparticles. The essential work of the fracture approach was utilized to study the fracture parameters, including elastic and plastic works of the blended polymer nanocomposites. The data were divided into 80 % for training and 20 % for testing. AdaBoost consistently achieved superior performance compared to the decision tree model in all variables throughout both the training and testing stages. During the testing phase, the AdaBoost model obtained <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values of 0.90 for Young's modulus, 0.93 for elongation at break, 0.87 for tensile strength, 0.86 for plastic work, and 0.60 for elastic work. Also, the mean absolute percentage error for the AdaBoost model during the test phase was 3.10 % for Young's modulus, 3.25 % for tensile strength, 10.34 % for elastic work, 13.55 % for plastic work, and 24.78 % for elongation at break. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis examining the effects of various features such as TPO type, nanoparticles, and nanoparticle type on mechanical properties reveals that TPO has the most significant overall influence. The results also include an analysis of the impact of the key features on each mechanical property based on the sensitivity analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100535"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266668202400104X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of decision tree and AdaBoost algorithms in predicting mechanical and fracture parameters of polypropylene nanocomposites toughened with ethylene-based and propylene-based thermoplastic elastomers and reinforced with fumed silica and halloysite nanotube nanoparticles. The essential work of the fracture approach was utilized to study the fracture parameters, including elastic and plastic works of the blended polymer nanocomposites. The data were divided into 80 % for training and 20 % for testing. AdaBoost consistently achieved superior performance compared to the decision tree model in all variables throughout both the training and testing stages. During the testing phase, the AdaBoost model obtained R2 values of 0.90 for Young's modulus, 0.93 for elongation at break, 0.87 for tensile strength, 0.86 for plastic work, and 0.60 for elastic work. Also, the mean absolute percentage error for the AdaBoost model during the test phase was 3.10 % for Young's modulus, 3.25 % for tensile strength, 10.34 % for elastic work, 13.55 % for plastic work, and 24.78 % for elongation at break. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis examining the effects of various features such as TPO type, nanoparticles, and nanoparticle type on mechanical properties reveals that TPO has the most significant overall influence. The results also include an analysis of the impact of the key features on each mechanical property based on the sensitivity analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习的敏感性分析和特征影响评估预测聚丙烯基纳米复合材料的拉伸和断裂参数
本研究探讨了决策树和 AdaBoost 算法在预测用乙烯基和丙烯基热塑性弹性体增韧并用气相二氧化硅和埃洛石纳米管纳米颗粒增强的聚丙烯纳米复合材料的力学和断裂参数方面的功效。利用断裂法的基本工作来研究断裂参数,包括混合聚合物纳米复合材料的弹性和塑性工作。数据分为 80% 用于训练,20% 用于测试。与决策树模型相比,AdaBoost 在整个训练和测试阶段的所有变量中都取得了优异的性能。在测试阶段,AdaBoost 模型的杨氏模量 R2 值为 0.90,断裂伸长率 R2 值为 0.93,拉伸强度 R2 值为 0.87,塑性功 R2 值为 0.86,弹性功 R2 值为 0.60。此外,AdaBoost 模型在测试阶段的平均绝对百分比误差为:杨氏模量 3.10%,拉伸强度 3.25%,弹性功 10.34%,塑性功 13.55%,断裂伸长率 24.78%。此外,对 TPO 类型、纳米粒子和纳米粒子类型等各种特征对机械性能影响的敏感性分析表明,TPO 的总体影响最大。结果还包括基于敏感性分析的关键特征对各项机械性能影响的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Hybrid lattice structure with micro graphite filler manufactured via additive manufacturing and growth foam polyurethane Cure-induced residual stresses and viscoelastic effects in repaired wind turbine blades: Analytical-numerical investigation Bioinspired surface modification of mussel shells and their application as a biogenic filler in polypropylene composites A review of repairing heat-damaged RC beams using externally bonded- and near-surface mounted-CFRP composites Comparative analysis of delamination resistance in CFRP laminates interleaved by thermoplastic nanoparticle: Evaluating toughening mechanisms in modes I and II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1