Green chemistry-based strategies for liquid-phase microextraction and determination of mercury species

IF 11.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.teac.2024.e00247
Rosivan Santos Assis , Jeferson Alves Barreto , Márcio José Silva Santos , Uneliton Neves Silva , Victor Miranda Amazonas , Clinzen Fona Cletche , Marcos Almeida Bezerra , Valfredo Azevedo Lemos
{"title":"Green chemistry-based strategies for liquid-phase microextraction and determination of mercury species","authors":"Rosivan Santos Assis ,&nbsp;Jeferson Alves Barreto ,&nbsp;Márcio José Silva Santos ,&nbsp;Uneliton Neves Silva ,&nbsp;Victor Miranda Amazonas ,&nbsp;Clinzen Fona Cletche ,&nbsp;Marcos Almeida Bezerra ,&nbsp;Valfredo Azevedo Lemos","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2024.e00247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This review article explores several liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) strategies in sample treatment for determining mercury species in several matrices. LPME can be subdivided into four main techniques: dispersive liquid-phase microextraction (DLPME), hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME), single drop liquid-phase microextraction (SDME), and cloud point extraction (CPE). The comparative analysis highlights the relative effectiveness of each method. DLPME enables shorter extraction times, but solvent consumption can be high. Although they provide high selectivity, HF-LPME, and SDME, in turn, require longer extraction times, and handling is complex. CPE, employing surfactant-based systems, offers a greener alternative with moderate efficiency but requires careful control of operating conditions. LPME techniques are evaluated in this review, considering advances in green chemistry and the determination and speciation of mercury. The advantages, limitations, and current applications of the techniques are also addressed in the text.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article e00247"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158824000230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review article explores several liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) strategies in sample treatment for determining mercury species in several matrices. LPME can be subdivided into four main techniques: dispersive liquid-phase microextraction (DLPME), hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME), single drop liquid-phase microextraction (SDME), and cloud point extraction (CPE). The comparative analysis highlights the relative effectiveness of each method. DLPME enables shorter extraction times, but solvent consumption can be high. Although they provide high selectivity, HF-LPME, and SDME, in turn, require longer extraction times, and handling is complex. CPE, employing surfactant-based systems, offers a greener alternative with moderate efficiency but requires careful control of operating conditions. LPME techniques are evaluated in this review, considering advances in green chemistry and the determination and speciation of mercury. The advantages, limitations, and current applications of the techniques are also addressed in the text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于绿色化学的液相微萃取和汞测定策略
这篇综述文章探讨了几种用于样品处理的液相微萃取(LPME)策略,以测定几种基质中的汞物种。液相微萃取技术可细分为四种主要技术:分散液相微萃取(DLPME)、中空纤维液相微萃取(HF-LPME)、单滴液相微萃取(SDME)和浊点萃取(CPE)。对比分析强调了每种方法的相对有效性。DLPME 可以缩短萃取时间,但溶剂消耗可能较高。HF-LPME 和 SDME 虽然选择性高,但萃取时间长,操作复杂。CPE 采用基于表面活性剂的系统,是一种更环保的替代方法,效率适中,但需要仔细控制操作条件。本综述对 LPME 技术进行了评估,同时考虑了绿色化学以及汞的测定和标示方面的进展。文中还讨论了这些技术的优势、局限性和当前的应用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.
期刊最新文献
Green chemistry-based strategies for liquid-phase microextraction and determination of mercury species Microplastics and nanoplastics in groundwater: Occurrence, analysis, and identification Evaluation of European watch list contaminants in environmental matrices and microplastics: Analytical strategies, mechanisms of adsorption and occurrence Pharmaceuticals and micro(nano)plastics in the environment: Sorption and analytical challenges Recent progress on multiplexed detection strategies of heavy metals with emphasis on quantum dots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1