Neoproterozoic basin evolution of the northern Tarim craton from back-arc rift to passive continental margin: Implications for the opening of the South Tianshan Ocean
Shuoqin Hou , Di Li , Dengfa He , Kaibo Shi , Yifan Li , Dan Fan , Jiajun Chen
{"title":"Neoproterozoic basin evolution of the northern Tarim craton from back-arc rift to passive continental margin: Implications for the opening of the South Tianshan Ocean","authors":"Shuoqin Hou , Di Li , Dengfa He , Kaibo Shi , Yifan Li , Dan Fan , Jiajun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.precamres.2024.107618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Neoproterozoic strata in the northern Tarim craton holds valuable tectono-sedimentary insights regarding the opening time and mechanisms of the South Tianshan Ocean, as well as the tectonic reconstruction of the Tarim craton during the breakup of Rodinia. However, debates remain around the Cryogenian–Ediacaran proto-basin type and evolution, as well as the lack of regional geological correlation at a basin scale. In this study, we employed seismic, drilling and outcrop data to conduct a combined tectono-stratigraphic and sedimentary filling analysis of the Cryogenian–Ediacaran strata in the northern Tarim craton, aiming to decipher the Neoproterozoic basin evolution. Our findings show that the deposition of the Cryogenian strata was controlled by normal faults, representing a rift basin receiving sedimentary materials from both the northern Tarim craton and the Central Tianshan block. In contrast, the Ediacaran developed as a depression basin featured by a wedge-shaped deposition with frequent sea-level fluctuations and simple detrital input from the northern Tarim craton, indicative of a passive margin basin. Such a Neoproterozoic basin evolution of the northern Tarim craton, from the Cryogenian rift to the Ediacaran passive margin, likely resulted from a back-arc extension due to the separation of the Central Tianshan arc from the Tarim craton. These results provide new constraints on the initial opening time of the South Tianshan Ocean at ca. 633 Ma and reveal the Neoproterozoic tectonic affinity of the Central Tianshan block and the northern Tarim craton. Our work also implies that the Tarim craton was located on the periphery of Rodinia, and the South Tianshan Ocean may not be a primary ocean basin of the Paleo-Asian Ocean.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49674,"journal":{"name":"Precambrian Research","volume":"415 ","pages":"Article 107618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precambrian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301926824003310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Neoproterozoic strata in the northern Tarim craton holds valuable tectono-sedimentary insights regarding the opening time and mechanisms of the South Tianshan Ocean, as well as the tectonic reconstruction of the Tarim craton during the breakup of Rodinia. However, debates remain around the Cryogenian–Ediacaran proto-basin type and evolution, as well as the lack of regional geological correlation at a basin scale. In this study, we employed seismic, drilling and outcrop data to conduct a combined tectono-stratigraphic and sedimentary filling analysis of the Cryogenian–Ediacaran strata in the northern Tarim craton, aiming to decipher the Neoproterozoic basin evolution. Our findings show that the deposition of the Cryogenian strata was controlled by normal faults, representing a rift basin receiving sedimentary materials from both the northern Tarim craton and the Central Tianshan block. In contrast, the Ediacaran developed as a depression basin featured by a wedge-shaped deposition with frequent sea-level fluctuations and simple detrital input from the northern Tarim craton, indicative of a passive margin basin. Such a Neoproterozoic basin evolution of the northern Tarim craton, from the Cryogenian rift to the Ediacaran passive margin, likely resulted from a back-arc extension due to the separation of the Central Tianshan arc from the Tarim craton. These results provide new constraints on the initial opening time of the South Tianshan Ocean at ca. 633 Ma and reveal the Neoproterozoic tectonic affinity of the Central Tianshan block and the northern Tarim craton. Our work also implies that the Tarim craton was located on the periphery of Rodinia, and the South Tianshan Ocean may not be a primary ocean basin of the Paleo-Asian Ocean.
塔里木克拉通北部的新元古代地层对于南天山洋的开辟时间和机制,以及罗迪尼亚断裂期间塔里木克拉通的构造重建具有宝贵的构造沉积认识。然而,关于冷元古代-始新世原盆地的类型和演化,以及缺乏盆地尺度的区域地质关联性等问题仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们利用地震、钻探和露头数据,对塔里木克拉通北部的冷元古代-埃迪卡拉纪地层进行了构造-地层和沉积充填的综合分析,旨在解读新近纪盆地的演化过程。我们的研究结果表明,冷元古代地层的沉积受到正断层的控制,是一个裂谷盆地,同时接受来自塔里木北部克拉通和天山中部地块的沉积物质。与此相反,埃迪卡拉纪的沉积呈楔形,海平面波动频繁,仅有来自塔里木北部克拉通的碎屑沉积,是一个凹陷盆地,表明这是一个被动边缘盆地。塔里木克拉通北部新元古代盆地的演化过程(从冷元断裂到埃迪卡拉被动边缘)很可能是由于中天山弧与塔里木克拉通的分离而导致的弧后延伸。这些结果为南天山洋在大约 633 Ma 的初始开辟时间提供了新的约束,并揭示了新新世大洋的形成过程。633 Ma,并揭示了中天山地块与塔里木北部克拉通的新近新生代构造亲缘关系。我们的研究还暗示塔里木克拉通位于罗迪尼亚的外围,南天山洋可能不是古亚洲洋的主洋盆。
期刊介绍:
Precambrian Research publishes studies on all aspects of the early stages of the composition, structure and evolution of the Earth and its planetary neighbours. With a focus on process-oriented and comparative studies, it covers, but is not restricted to, subjects such as:
(1) Chemical, biological, biochemical and cosmochemical evolution; the origin of life; the evolution of the oceans and atmosphere; the early fossil record; palaeobiology;
(2) Geochronology and isotope and elemental geochemistry;
(3) Precambrian mineral deposits;
(4) Geophysical aspects of the early Earth and Precambrian terrains;
(5) Nature, formation and evolution of the Precambrian lithosphere and mantle including magmatic, depositional, metamorphic and tectonic processes.
In addition, the editors particularly welcome integrated process-oriented studies that involve a combination of the above fields and comparative studies that demonstrate the effect of Precambrian evolution on Phanerozoic earth system processes.
Regional and localised studies of Precambrian phenomena are considered appropriate only when the detail and quality allow illustration of a wider process, or when significant gaps in basic knowledge of a particular area can be filled.