Experimental comparison of cycle modifications and ejector control methods using variable geometry and CO2 pump in a multi-evaporator transcritical CO2 refrigeration system

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.10.001
Gabriele Toffoletti , Riley B. Barta , Steven M. Grajales , Haotian Liu , Davide Ziviani , Eckhard A. Groll
{"title":"Experimental comparison of cycle modifications and ejector control methods using variable geometry and CO2 pump in a multi-evaporator transcritical CO2 refrigeration system","authors":"Gabriele Toffoletti ,&nbsp;Riley B. Barta ,&nbsp;Steven M. Grajales ,&nbsp;Haotian Liu ,&nbsp;Davide Ziviani ,&nbsp;Eckhard A. Groll","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To reduce the direct global warming impact of refrigerants in HVAC&amp;R applications, low-global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants, including natural refrigerants, have been extensively investigated as alternatives to hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants. Among the natural refrigerants, Carbon Dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) offers several advantages, such as excellent transport and thermo-physical properties, being neither toxic nor flammable, and having a low price and high availability around the world. However, the high critical pressure and low critical temperature of CO<sub>2</sub> often lead to transcritical operation, resulting in lower efficiency due to the additional compressor power necessary to achieve transcritical operation relative to subcritical HFC cycles. Therefore, a number of cycle modifications are used to enhance the coefficient of performance (COP) of transcritical CO<sub>2</sub> cycles to meet or surpass those of HFC cycles. This paper provides a systematic experimental investigation of four such cycle architectures by employing the same multi-stage, two-evaporator CO<sub>2</sub> refrigeration cycle test stand, 3 of these configurations in transcritical and 1 in subcritical conditions. The four cycles architectures included intercooling, open economization, an internal heat exchanger and two different ejector control approaches. Specifically, a variable-diameter motive nozzle and a variable-speed liquid CO<sub>2</sub> pump located directly upstream of the ejector motive nozzle inlet were analyzed. Based on the experimental data, the maximum COP improvements are 4.64 % and 9.47 % when the ejector and the internal heat exchanger are used, respectively. The CO<sub>2</sub> pump, once successfully stabilized, can control the ejector, increase its efficiency by up to 15 % and increase the cooling capacity to a maximum of 6.2 %. Nevertheless, a reduction in COP is measured when the pump is in use; however, unlike the other three different configurations, it was only analyzed under subcritical conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14274,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 226-240"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014070072400344X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To reduce the direct global warming impact of refrigerants in HVAC&R applications, low-global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants, including natural refrigerants, have been extensively investigated as alternatives to hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants. Among the natural refrigerants, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) offers several advantages, such as excellent transport and thermo-physical properties, being neither toxic nor flammable, and having a low price and high availability around the world. However, the high critical pressure and low critical temperature of CO2 often lead to transcritical operation, resulting in lower efficiency due to the additional compressor power necessary to achieve transcritical operation relative to subcritical HFC cycles. Therefore, a number of cycle modifications are used to enhance the coefficient of performance (COP) of transcritical CO2 cycles to meet or surpass those of HFC cycles. This paper provides a systematic experimental investigation of four such cycle architectures by employing the same multi-stage, two-evaporator CO2 refrigeration cycle test stand, 3 of these configurations in transcritical and 1 in subcritical conditions. The four cycles architectures included intercooling, open economization, an internal heat exchanger and two different ejector control approaches. Specifically, a variable-diameter motive nozzle and a variable-speed liquid CO2 pump located directly upstream of the ejector motive nozzle inlet were analyzed. Based on the experimental data, the maximum COP improvements are 4.64 % and 9.47 % when the ejector and the internal heat exchanger are used, respectively. The CO2 pump, once successfully stabilized, can control the ejector, increase its efficiency by up to 15 % and increase the cooling capacity to a maximum of 6.2 %. Nevertheless, a reduction in COP is measured when the pump is in use; however, unlike the other three different configurations, it was only analyzed under subcritical conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多蒸发器跨临界二氧化碳制冷系统中使用可变几何形状和二氧化碳泵的循环改造和喷射器控制方法的实验比较
为了减少制冷剂在暖通空调与制冷应用中对全球变暖的直接影响,人们对包括天然制冷剂在内的低全球升温潜能值(GWP)制冷剂进行了广泛研究,将其作为氢氟碳化合物(HFC)制冷剂的替代品。在天然制冷剂中,二氧化碳(CO2)具有多种优势,如优异的运输和热物理性能,既无毒也不易燃,而且价格低廉,在世界各地的供应量很大。然而,二氧化碳的临界压力高、临界温度低,通常会导致跨临界运行,与亚临界氢氟碳化物循环相比,实现跨临界运行需要额外的压缩机功率,因此效率较低。因此,许多循环改造被用来提高跨临界 CO2 循环的性能系数 (COP),以达到或超过 HFC 循环的性能系数。本文通过使用相同的多级双蒸发器 CO2 制冷循环试验台,对四种此类循环结构进行了系统的实验研究,其中三种配置在跨临界条件下,一种在亚临界条件下。这四种循环结构包括中冷、开放式节约、内部热交换器和两种不同的喷射器控制方法。具体来说,分析了位于喷射器喷嘴入口上游的可变直径喷嘴和变速液态二氧化碳泵。根据实验数据,使用喷射器和内部热交换器时,COP 的最大改善率分别为 4.64 % 和 9.47 %。二氧化碳泵一旦成功稳定,就能控制喷射器,将其效率提高 15%,并将冷却能力最大提高 6.2%。不过,在使用该泵时,COP 会有所降低;但与其他三种不同配置不同的是,该泵仅在亚临界状态下进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Refrigeration is published for the International Institute of Refrigeration (IIR) by Elsevier. It is essential reading for all those wishing to keep abreast of research and industrial news in refrigeration, air conditioning and associated fields. This is particularly important in these times of rapid introduction of alternative refrigerants and the emergence of new technology. The journal has published special issues on alternative refrigerants and novel topics in the field of boiling, condensation, heat pumps, food refrigeration, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrocarbons, magnetic refrigeration at room temperature, sorptive cooling, phase change materials and slurries, ejector technology, compressors, and solar cooling. As well as original research papers the International Journal of Refrigeration also includes review articles, papers presented at IIR conferences, short reports and letters describing preliminary results and experimental details, and letters to the Editor on recent areas of discussion and controversy. Other features include forthcoming events, conference reports and book reviews. Papers are published in either English or French with the IIR news section in both languages.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Data-enhanced convolutional network based on air conditioning system start/stop time prediction Start-up investigation and heat transfer enhancement analysis of a loop thermosyphon with biomimetic honeycomb-channel evaporator Optimal Intermediate Pressure Investigation in a CO₂ Transcritical Distributed Compression Refrigeration Cycle Thermodynamic and technoeconomic limitations of Brayton refrigeration for air conditioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1