Applications of Text Mining techniques to extract meaningful information from gastroenterology medical reports

IF 3.1 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Computational Science Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102458
Rosarina Vallelunga , Ileana Scarpino , Maria Chiara Martinis , Francesco Luzza , Chiara Zucco
{"title":"Applications of Text Mining techniques to extract meaningful information from gastroenterology medical reports","authors":"Rosarina Vallelunga ,&nbsp;Ileana Scarpino ,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Martinis ,&nbsp;Francesco Luzza ,&nbsp;Chiara Zucco","doi":"10.1016/j.jocs.2024.102458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Text mining techniques, particularly topic modeling, can be used for the automatic extraction of information from medical reports. The ability to autonomously analyze texts and identify topics within them can provide meaningful clinical insights that support physicians in diagnostic settings and enhance the characterization of intestinal diseases, leading to more efficient and automated systems.</div><div>This study evaluates the effectiveness of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and BERTopic in modeling topics from colonoscopy reports related to Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, and Polyps. We compared these models in terms of their ability to identify clinically relevant topics, their influence on the performance of machine learning classifiers trained on the derived topic features, and their scalability.</div><div>Our analysis, based on average results across five iterations of train-test splits, showed that BERTopic generally outperformed LDA in clustering metrics, achieving Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), Normalized Mutual Information (NMI), and Purity scores of 0.5637, 0.5953, and 0.8447, respectively, compared to LDA’s scores of 0.5349, 0.5254, and 0.8149. Additionally, classifiers trained on BERTopic-derived features exhibited improved predictive accuracy and F1-scores, with Logistic Regression reaching a mean accuracy of 0.8464 and a mean F1-score of 0.8507, compared to 0.8319 and 0.8351 for LDA-based features. Despite BERTopic’s overall superior performance, LDA demonstrated greater stability and interpretability, making it a viable option in scenarios where computational efficiency is a priority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Science","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 102458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877750324002515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Text mining techniques, particularly topic modeling, can be used for the automatic extraction of information from medical reports. The ability to autonomously analyze texts and identify topics within them can provide meaningful clinical insights that support physicians in diagnostic settings and enhance the characterization of intestinal diseases, leading to more efficient and automated systems.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and BERTopic in modeling topics from colonoscopy reports related to Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, and Polyps. We compared these models in terms of their ability to identify clinically relevant topics, their influence on the performance of machine learning classifiers trained on the derived topic features, and their scalability.
Our analysis, based on average results across five iterations of train-test splits, showed that BERTopic generally outperformed LDA in clustering metrics, achieving Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), Normalized Mutual Information (NMI), and Purity scores of 0.5637, 0.5953, and 0.8447, respectively, compared to LDA’s scores of 0.5349, 0.5254, and 0.8149. Additionally, classifiers trained on BERTopic-derived features exhibited improved predictive accuracy and F1-scores, with Logistic Regression reaching a mean accuracy of 0.8464 and a mean F1-score of 0.8507, compared to 0.8319 and 0.8351 for LDA-based features. Despite BERTopic’s overall superior performance, LDA demonstrated greater stability and interpretability, making it a viable option in scenarios where computational efficiency is a priority.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用文本挖掘技术从消化内科医疗报告中提取有意义的信息
文本挖掘技术,尤其是主题建模,可用于从医疗报告中自动提取信息。本研究评估了潜在 Dirichlet 分配(LDA)和 BERTopic 对结肠镜检查报告中有关克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎和息肉的主题建模的有效性。我们比较了这些模型识别临床相关主题的能力、它们对根据衍生主题特征训练的机器学习分类器性能的影响以及它们的可扩展性。我们的分析基于训练-测试分裂五次迭代的平均结果,结果表明 BERTopic 在聚类指标上普遍优于 LDA,调整兰德指数 (ARI)、归一化互信息 (NMI) 和纯度得分分别为 0.5637、0.5953 和 0.8447,而 LDA 的得分分别为 0.5349、0.5254 和 0.8149。此外,基于 BERTopic 派生特征训练的分类器的预测准确率和 F1 分数也有所提高,逻辑回归的平均准确率为 0.8464,平均 F1 分数为 0.8507,而基于 LDA 特征的平均准确率和 F1 分数分别为 0.8319 和 0.8351。尽管 BERTopic 的整体性能更优越,但 LDA 表现出更高的稳定性和可解释性,使其在计算效率优先的情况下成为一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computational Science
Journal of Computational Science COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
227
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Computational Science is a rapidly growing multi- and interdisciplinary field that uses advanced computing and data analysis to understand and solve complex problems. It has reached a level of predictive capability that now firmly complements the traditional pillars of experimentation and theory. The recent advances in experimental techniques such as detectors, on-line sensor networks and high-resolution imaging techniques, have opened up new windows into physical and biological processes at many levels of detail. The resulting data explosion allows for detailed data driven modeling and simulation. This new discipline in science combines computational thinking, modern computational methods, devices and collateral technologies to address problems far beyond the scope of traditional numerical methods. Computational science typically unifies three distinct elements: • Modeling, Algorithms and Simulations (e.g. numerical and non-numerical, discrete and continuous); • Software developed to solve science (e.g., biological, physical, and social), engineering, medicine, and humanities problems; • Computer and information science that develops and optimizes the advanced system hardware, software, networking, and data management components (e.g. problem solving environments).
期刊最新文献
Establishing a massively parallel computational model of the adaptive immune response Unsupervised continual learning by cross-level, instance-group and pseudo-group discrimination with hard attention A cluster-based opposition differential evolution algorithm boosted by a local search for ECG signal classification Community-based voting approach to enhance the spreading dynamics by identifying a group of influential spreaders in complex networks Deep dive into generative models through feature interpoint distances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1