Evolving practice patterns of young retinal specialists: A five-year comparison of treatment and surgical preferences

Vincent Huang , Brian L VanderBeek , Sidney A Schechet , Hemang K Pandya , Mitul C Mehta , Jonathan C Tsui
{"title":"Evolving practice patterns of young retinal specialists: A five-year comparison of treatment and surgical preferences","authors":"Vincent Huang ,&nbsp;Brian L VanderBeek ,&nbsp;Sidney A Schechet ,&nbsp;Hemang K Pandya ,&nbsp;Mitul C Mehta ,&nbsp;Jonathan C Tsui","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To describe trends in demographics and practice patterns of young retina specialists over a five-year follow-up period.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional study of young retinal specialists conducted through an online social media platform to evaluate practice patterns for common conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous survey was performed among U.S.-based young retinal specialists from a variety of practice environments in early stages of practice between August and September 2022. Results were compared to survey results from 2017.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2022, the survey population included 358 members with 101 respondents compared to 44 respondents in 2017. Most respondents preferred bevacizumab as first-line treatment for foveal-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) (60%), vein occlusions (54%), and macular degeneration (56%). Aflibercept was more popular as first-line for DME patients with poor vision (51%) compared to those with good vision (18%). For proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) without macular edema, respondents prefer panretinal photocoagulation alone (43%) or in combination with anti-VEGF (48%) over anti-VEGF alone (10%). Respondents repaired rhegmatogenous retinal detachments using combined vitrectomy-buckle (20%), primary scleral buckle (10%), and pneumatic retinopexy (PR) (10%). The percentage of respondents who have used PR at least once increased significantly from 2017 to 2022. From 2017 to 2022, more respondents use masks (29.5% to 82.8%) and post-injection antibiotics (2.3% to 16.0%) when performing injections while a smaller minority use topical gel anesthesia (34.1% to 15.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Survey results suggest more providers are more likely to observe good visual acuity in diabetic edema and use laser alone in PDR without edema. In addition, longitudinal trends show increased use of PR, masks and post-injection antibiotics, and decreased use of topical gel anesthesia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To describe trends in demographics and practice patterns of young retina specialists over a five-year follow-up period.

Design

A cross-sectional study of young retinal specialists conducted through an online social media platform to evaluate practice patterns for common conditions.

Methods

An anonymous survey was performed among U.S.-based young retinal specialists from a variety of practice environments in early stages of practice between August and September 2022. Results were compared to survey results from 2017.

Results

In 2022, the survey population included 358 members with 101 respondents compared to 44 respondents in 2017. Most respondents preferred bevacizumab as first-line treatment for foveal-involving diabetic macular edema (DME) (60%), vein occlusions (54%), and macular degeneration (56%). Aflibercept was more popular as first-line for DME patients with poor vision (51%) compared to those with good vision (18%). For proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) without macular edema, respondents prefer panretinal photocoagulation alone (43%) or in combination with anti-VEGF (48%) over anti-VEGF alone (10%). Respondents repaired rhegmatogenous retinal detachments using combined vitrectomy-buckle (20%), primary scleral buckle (10%), and pneumatic retinopexy (PR) (10%). The percentage of respondents who have used PR at least once increased significantly from 2017 to 2022. From 2017 to 2022, more respondents use masks (29.5% to 82.8%) and post-injection antibiotics (2.3% to 16.0%) when performing injections while a smaller minority use topical gel anesthesia (34.1% to 15.5%).

Conclusions

Survey results suggest more providers are more likely to observe good visual acuity in diabetic edema and use laser alone in PDR without edema. In addition, longitudinal trends show increased use of PR, masks and post-injection antibiotics, and decreased use of topical gel anesthesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻视网膜专科医生不断演变的诊疗模式:治疗和手术偏好的五年比较
目的描述五年随访期间年轻视网膜专科医生的人口统计学和实践模式的趋势.设计通过在线社交媒体平台对年轻视网膜专科医生进行横断面研究,评估常见疾病的实践模式.方法在2022年8月至9月期间,对来自不同实践环境、处于实践早期阶段的美国年轻视网膜专科医生进行匿名调查。结果2022年,调查人群包括358名成员,有101名受访者,而2017年有44名受访者。大多数受访者倾向于将贝伐单抗作为眼窝受累型糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)(60%)、静脉闭塞(54%)和黄斑变性(56%)的一线治疗药物。与视力良好的患者(18%)相比,视力较差的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者(51%)更倾向于将 Aflibercept 作为一线治疗药物。对于不伴有黄斑水肿的增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR),受访者更倾向于单独使用泛视网膜光凝(43%)或与抗血管内皮生长因子联合使用(48%),而不是单独使用抗血管内皮生长因子(10%)。受访者修复流变性视网膜脱离的方法有:联合玻璃体切割扣合术(20%)、初级巩膜扣合术(10%)和气动视网膜剥离术(10%)。从 2017 年到 2022 年,至少使用过一次 PR 的受访者比例显著增加。从 2017 年到 2022 年,更多的受访者在进行注射时使用面罩(29.5% 到 82.8%)和注射后抗生素(2.3% 到 16.0%),而少数受访者使用局部凝胶麻醉(34.1% 到 15.5%)。结论调查结果表明,更多的医疗服务提供者更有可能在糖尿病水肿中观察到良好的视力,并在无水肿的 PDR 中单独使用激光。此外,纵向趋势显示,PR、面罩和注射后抗生素的使用有所增加,而局部凝胶麻醉的使用有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant concomitant to cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa: potential retinal preservation effect FaceFinder: A machine learning tool for identification of facial images from heterogenous datasets Gender based differences in electronic medical record utilization in an academic ophthalmology practice Evolving practice patterns of young retinal specialists: A five-year comparison of treatment and surgical preferences Candida parapsilosis keratitis: A case series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1