An analysis of child safeguarding cases managed by National Governing Bodies of sport across England and Wales

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse Review Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1002/car.70004
Daniel Rhind, Robert Booth, Rachel Ade, Nick Slinn, Jude Towesland, Olivia Garrod
{"title":"An analysis of child safeguarding cases managed by National Governing Bodies of sport across England and Wales","authors":"Daniel Rhind,&nbsp;Robert Booth,&nbsp;Rachel Ade,&nbsp;Nick Slinn,&nbsp;Jude Towesland,&nbsp;Olivia Garrod","doi":"10.1002/car.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study responded to a recommendation in the independent Duty of Care Report that called for standardised data to be collected and analysed regarding safeguarding cases in sport. A standardised case data tool was developed and piloted before being adopted by National Governing Bodies across England and Wales. An analysis of the first 4 years of data shows that a total of 3129 cases were managed. Overall, 54% of cases concerned behaviour outside of the context of sport. This demonstrates that sport plays an important role in the broader child protection system. In the remaining 46% of cases, the safeguarding concern was related to behaviour in the context of sport. The most commonly reported forms of concern in sport were physical abuse (20%), contact sexual abuse (20%), non-contact sexual abuse (17%) and emotional abuse (17%). The threshold for cases to be included in the analysis was that the case was judged to be sufficiently serious to involve referral to, or consultation with, the Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO), Children's Services or the Police. There are clearly many cases that did not meet this threshold or were never reported, and hence, these data provide an indication of the safeguarding issues related to sport. The need to expand the tool to collect lower level concerns as well as to include safeguarding concerns regarding adults is advocated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47371,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse Review","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/car.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/car.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study responded to a recommendation in the independent Duty of Care Report that called for standardised data to be collected and analysed regarding safeguarding cases in sport. A standardised case data tool was developed and piloted before being adopted by National Governing Bodies across England and Wales. An analysis of the first 4 years of data shows that a total of 3129 cases were managed. Overall, 54% of cases concerned behaviour outside of the context of sport. This demonstrates that sport plays an important role in the broader child protection system. In the remaining 46% of cases, the safeguarding concern was related to behaviour in the context of sport. The most commonly reported forms of concern in sport were physical abuse (20%), contact sexual abuse (20%), non-contact sexual abuse (17%) and emotional abuse (17%). The threshold for cases to be included in the analysis was that the case was judged to be sufficiently serious to involve referral to, or consultation with, the Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO), Children's Services or the Police. There are clearly many cases that did not meet this threshold or were never reported, and hence, these data provide an indication of the safeguarding issues related to sport. The need to expand the tool to collect lower level concerns as well as to include safeguarding concerns regarding adults is advocated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对英格兰和威尔士国家体育管理机构管理的儿童保护案件的分析
独立的 "关爱责任报告 "要求收集和分析有关体育运动中保障案件的标准化数据,这项研究正是对该建议的回应。在英格兰和威尔士的国家管理机构采用之前,开发并试用了一种标准化的案件数据工具。对前 4 年数据的分析表明,共处理了 3129 起案件。总体而言,54%的案件涉及体育以外的行为。这表明,体育在更广泛的儿童保护体系中发挥着重要作用。在其余 46%的案例中,保护问题与体育运动中的行为有关。体育运动中最常报告的关注形式是身体虐待(20%)、接触性性虐待(20%)、非接触性性虐待(17%)和情感虐待(17%)。将案件纳入分析的门槛是,案件被判定为足够严重,需要转介或咨询地方当局指定官员(LADO)、儿童服务部门或警方。显然,有许多案件未达到这一门槛或从未报告,因此,这些数据提供了与体育有关的保障问题的说明。我们主张有必要扩展该工具,以收集较低层次的问题,并将有关成人的保障问题包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Abuse Review
Child Abuse Review Multiple-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Child Abuse Review provides a forum for all professionals working in the field of child protection, giving them access to the latest research findings, practice developments, training initiatives and policy issues. The Journal"s remit includes all forms of maltreatment, whether they occur inside or outside the family environment. Papers are written in a style appropriate for a multidisciplinary audience and those from outside Britain are welcomed. The Journal maintains a practice orientated focus and authors of research papers are encouraged to examine and discuss implications for practitioners.
期刊最新文献
An analysis of child safeguarding cases managed by National Governing Bodies of sport across England and Wales The intersection of child protection and healthcare: Paediatric social admissions Proactive and reactive sibling aggression and their mediating effects on the relationship between exposure to parental violence and adulthood intimate partner violence perpetration Does money motivate prospective foster parents? Are responses from high vs. low-income towns different? Evidence from Google advertising A thematic analysis of the involvement of children and families in Child Safeguarding Practice Reviews in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1