{"title":"Bringing together but staying apart: decisive differences in animal and fungal mitochondrial inner membrane fusion.","authors":"Hassan Hashimi, Ondřej Gahura, Tomáš Pánek","doi":"10.1111/brv.13168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mitochondria are dynamic and plastic, undergoing continuous fission and fusion and rearrangement of their bioenergetic sub-compartments called cristae. These fascinating processes are best understood in animal and fungal models, which are taxonomically grouped together in the expansive Opisthokonta supergroup. In opisthokonts, crista remodelling and inner membrane fusion are linked by dynamin-related proteins (DRPs). Animal Opa1 (optical atrophy 1) and fungal Mgm1 (mitochondrial genome maintenance 1) are tacitly considered orthologs because their similar mitochondria-shaping roles are mediated by seemingly shared biochemical properties, and due to their presence in the two major opisthokontan subdivisions, Holozoa and Holomycota, respectively. However, molecular phylogenetics challenges this notion, suggesting that Opa1 and Mgm1 likely had separate, albeit convergent, evolutionary paths. Herein, we illuminate disparities in proteolytic processing, structure, and interaction network that may have bestowed on Opa1 and Mgm1 distinct mechanisms of membrane remodelling. A key disparity is that, unlike Mgm1, Opa1 directly recruits the mitochondrial phospholipid cardiolipin to remodel membranes. The differences outlined herein between the two DRPs could have broader impacts on mitochondrial morphogenesis. Outer and inner membrane fusion are autonomous in animals, which may have freed Opa1 to repurpose its intrinsic activity to remodel cristae, thereby regulating the formation of respiratory chain supercomplexes. More significantly, Opa1-mediated crista remodelling has emerged as an integral part of cytochrome c-regulated apoptosis in vertebrates, and perhaps in the cenancestor of animals. By contrast, outer and inner membrane fusion are coupled in budding yeast. Consequently, Mgm1 membrane-fusion activity is inextricable from its role in the biogenesis of fungal lamellar cristae. These disparate mitochondrial DRPs ultimately may have contributed to the different modes of multicellularity that have evolved within Opisthokonta.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13168","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mitochondria are dynamic and plastic, undergoing continuous fission and fusion and rearrangement of their bioenergetic sub-compartments called cristae. These fascinating processes are best understood in animal and fungal models, which are taxonomically grouped together in the expansive Opisthokonta supergroup. In opisthokonts, crista remodelling and inner membrane fusion are linked by dynamin-related proteins (DRPs). Animal Opa1 (optical atrophy 1) and fungal Mgm1 (mitochondrial genome maintenance 1) are tacitly considered orthologs because their similar mitochondria-shaping roles are mediated by seemingly shared biochemical properties, and due to their presence in the two major opisthokontan subdivisions, Holozoa and Holomycota, respectively. However, molecular phylogenetics challenges this notion, suggesting that Opa1 and Mgm1 likely had separate, albeit convergent, evolutionary paths. Herein, we illuminate disparities in proteolytic processing, structure, and interaction network that may have bestowed on Opa1 and Mgm1 distinct mechanisms of membrane remodelling. A key disparity is that, unlike Mgm1, Opa1 directly recruits the mitochondrial phospholipid cardiolipin to remodel membranes. The differences outlined herein between the two DRPs could have broader impacts on mitochondrial morphogenesis. Outer and inner membrane fusion are autonomous in animals, which may have freed Opa1 to repurpose its intrinsic activity to remodel cristae, thereby regulating the formation of respiratory chain supercomplexes. More significantly, Opa1-mediated crista remodelling has emerged as an integral part of cytochrome c-regulated apoptosis in vertebrates, and perhaps in the cenancestor of animals. By contrast, outer and inner membrane fusion are coupled in budding yeast. Consequently, Mgm1 membrane-fusion activity is inextricable from its role in the biogenesis of fungal lamellar cristae. These disparate mitochondrial DRPs ultimately may have contributed to the different modes of multicellularity that have evolved within Opisthokonta.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.