{"title":"The role of musculoskeletal ultrasound in difficult-to-treat RA: Insights from a systematic literature review.","authors":"Elisa Bellis, Federica Agugliaro, Claudia Garulli, Silvia Perrone, Gaetano Liperoti, Mariele Gatto, Annamaria Iagnocco","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) identifies patients with insufficient response to biological or targeted-synthetic disease-modifying drugs (b/ts DMARDs), heralding a more severe phenotype. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) provides information on MSK inflammatory load and damage, being widely used in RA and inflammatory arthritides, yet the US patterns of D2TRA and correlation with clinical parameters have not been unanimously described so far. Here we investigated MSK-US patterns and their prognostic value in D2TRA through a systematic literature review (SLR) across MEDLINE (through PubMed), Scopus and Ovid (Embase) electronic databases. We initially retrieved 2365 papers; following the application of appropriate strings the number was lowered to 22. Among those, three papers fulfilled the required criteria. A total of 159 patients with D2TRA were analyzed. In comparison to non-D2TRA, D2TRA patients exhibited more extensive and severe synovitis, which correlated with higher disease activity scores and poorer treatment outcomes. Most US-affected joints belonged to hand and wrist. Grey-scale (GS) rather than power-Doppler (PD) synovitis score was consistently increased across D2TRA joints. Inclusion of US in recognition of D2TRA decreased the proportion of classifiable patients, identifying the true inflammatory D2T cases. The results of this SLR suggest that standardization of US phenotyping may aid the identification and stratification of D2TRA patients in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":" ","pages":"103694"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103694","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) identifies patients with insufficient response to biological or targeted-synthetic disease-modifying drugs (b/ts DMARDs), heralding a more severe phenotype. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) provides information on MSK inflammatory load and damage, being widely used in RA and inflammatory arthritides, yet the US patterns of D2TRA and correlation with clinical parameters have not been unanimously described so far. Here we investigated MSK-US patterns and their prognostic value in D2TRA through a systematic literature review (SLR) across MEDLINE (through PubMed), Scopus and Ovid (Embase) electronic databases. We initially retrieved 2365 papers; following the application of appropriate strings the number was lowered to 22. Among those, three papers fulfilled the required criteria. A total of 159 patients with D2TRA were analyzed. In comparison to non-D2TRA, D2TRA patients exhibited more extensive and severe synovitis, which correlated with higher disease activity scores and poorer treatment outcomes. Most US-affected joints belonged to hand and wrist. Grey-scale (GS) rather than power-Doppler (PD) synovitis score was consistently increased across D2TRA joints. Inclusion of US in recognition of D2TRA decreased the proportion of classifiable patients, identifying the true inflammatory D2T cases. The results of this SLR suggest that standardization of US phenotyping may aid the identification and stratification of D2TRA patients in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers.
The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences.
In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations.
Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.