Follow-up by telephone questionnaire in outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1007/s10006-024-01305-3
Frizzi Bschorer, Reinhard Bschorer
{"title":"Follow-up by telephone questionnaire in outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery.","authors":"Frizzi Bschorer, Reinhard Bschorer","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01305-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The SARS-CoV2 pandemic introduced a new problem in postoperative outpatient care: If I set a follow-up appointment at the clinic, will I endanger my patient? This study presents a different way to identify problems in the postoperative setting after outpatient procedures in our field- the telephone interview.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study nurse conducted the telephone interview using a structured questionnaire within one week of minor outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery. She asked about pain, swelling, numbness, and mouth opening limitations. Certain red flag answers (numbness, increasing pain, increasing swelling, pain keeping patient from sleeping, pain on swallowing) caused her to book an appointment for the patient in our clinic within the following 24 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>52 Patients completed the telephone questionnaire. Of those 3 (5.7%) had red flag answers that resulted in an appointment at the hospital within 24 hours. 2 (3.8%) of them were due to numbness. 24 (46.2%) patients reported no pain. On the numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), the average reported pain was 2.24 (SE 0.30). Swelling was reported by 39 (75%) patients. 22 (42.3%) reported the swelling to be mild, 10 (19.2%) moderate, and 7 (13.5%) to be severe. 13 (25%) patients reported a limitation to mouth opening. None reported the interincisal distance to be smaller than one finger.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured telephone questionnaire can be a useful tool to discern postoperative complications and initiate necessary treatment. At the same time, it minimizes overtreatment. It can be used as a standard tool in the ambulatory treatment. It can be delegated to a secretary or ambulatory nurse with a standardized questionnaire to optimize resource use for selected patients. Moreover, patients describe it as a service to be called at home and they avoid unnecessary travel.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01305-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The SARS-CoV2 pandemic introduced a new problem in postoperative outpatient care: If I set a follow-up appointment at the clinic, will I endanger my patient? This study presents a different way to identify problems in the postoperative setting after outpatient procedures in our field- the telephone interview.

Methods: A study nurse conducted the telephone interview using a structured questionnaire within one week of minor outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery. She asked about pain, swelling, numbness, and mouth opening limitations. Certain red flag answers (numbness, increasing pain, increasing swelling, pain keeping patient from sleeping, pain on swallowing) caused her to book an appointment for the patient in our clinic within the following 24 hours.

Results: 52 Patients completed the telephone questionnaire. Of those 3 (5.7%) had red flag answers that resulted in an appointment at the hospital within 24 hours. 2 (3.8%) of them were due to numbness. 24 (46.2%) patients reported no pain. On the numerical rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), the average reported pain was 2.24 (SE 0.30). Swelling was reported by 39 (75%) patients. 22 (42.3%) reported the swelling to be mild, 10 (19.2%) moderate, and 7 (13.5%) to be severe. 13 (25%) patients reported a limitation to mouth opening. None reported the interincisal distance to be smaller than one finger.

Conclusion: A structured telephone questionnaire can be a useful tool to discern postoperative complications and initiate necessary treatment. At the same time, it minimizes overtreatment. It can be used as a standard tool in the ambulatory treatment. It can be delegated to a secretary or ambulatory nurse with a standardized questionnaire to optimize resource use for selected patients. Moreover, patients describe it as a service to be called at home and they avoid unnecessary travel.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过电话问卷对口腔颌面外科门诊病人进行随访。
目的:SARS-CoV2 大流行为术后门诊护理带来了一个新问题:如果我在门诊预约复诊,是否会危及病人?本研究提出了一种不同的方法--电话访谈--来发现本领域门诊手术后的问题:研究护士在口腔颌面外科门诊小手术后一周内使用结构化问卷进行了电话访谈。她询问了疼痛、肿胀、麻木和张口受限的情况。某些提示性答案(麻木、疼痛加剧、肿胀加剧、疼痛使患者无法入睡、吞咽疼痛)会导致她在随后的 24 小时内为患者预约本诊所:52 名患者完成了电话问卷调查。结果:52 名患者填写了电话问卷,其中 3 人(占 5.7%)回答了需要在 24 小时内到医院就诊的问题,2 人(占 3.8%)回答了需要在 24 小时内到医院就诊的问题。其中 2 人(3.8%)是因为麻木。24(46.2%)名患者表示没有疼痛感。根据从 0(无痛)到 10(最痛)的数字评分表,报告的平均疼痛程度为 2.24(SE 0.30)。39(75%)名患者报告出现肿胀。22名(42.3%)患者报告肿胀为轻度,10名(19.2%)为中度,7名(13.5%)为重度。13(25%)名患者表示张口受限。没有人报告颌间距离小于一指:结论:结构化的电话问卷调查是发现术后并发症和启动必要治疗的有用工具。同时,它还能最大限度地减少过度治疗。它可以作为门诊治疗的标准工具。可以委托秘书或门诊护士使用标准化问卷,优化选定患者的资源使用。此外,患者认为这是在家里就能享受到的服务,可以避免不必要的奔波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery founded as Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie is a peer-reviewed online journal. It is designed for clinicians as well as researchers.The quarterly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. The journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as supporting specialties. Practice-oriented articles help improve the methods used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is fully covered through a range of invited review articles, clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, and case reports. Specific topics are: aesthetic facial surgery, clinical pathology, computer-assisted surgery, congenital and craniofacial deformities, dentoalveolar surgery, head and neck oncology, implant dentistry, oral medicine, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, skull base surgery, TMJ and trauma.Time-limited reviewing and electronic processing allow to publish articles as fast as possible. Accepted articles are rapidly accessible online.Clinical studies submitted for publication have to include a declaration that they have been approved by an ethical committee according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (last amendment during the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000). Experimental animal studies have to be carried out according to the principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication No 86-23, revised 1985).
期刊最新文献
Effect of ozone and low power laser as therapeutic alternatives on the alveolar repair process after tooth extraction in rats wistar exposed to nicotine. Analysis of vertical loading forces on three different sagittal split ramus osteotomy modifications. Genetic association of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene polymorphisms (rs2227631 and rs6092) with susceptibility to oral premalignant disorders in a South Indian cohort. Direct oral anticoagulant use in oral surgery: insights from a systematic review. Clinical implementation of the 3D 4K exoscope (Orbeye™) in reconstructive head and neck surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1