Ineffective overweight self-management: A study of diagnostic accuracy and etiological relationships.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Knowledge Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12497
Ana Carolina Costa Carino, Renata Marinho Fernandes, Juliane Rangel Dantas, Cláudio César Guimarães Martins, Annaiza Freitas Lopes de Araújo, Maria Isabel da Conceição Dias Fernandes, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho Lira
{"title":"Ineffective overweight self-management: A study of diagnostic accuracy and etiological relationships.","authors":"Ana Carolina Costa Carino, Renata Marinho Fernandes, Juliane Rangel Dantas, Cláudio César Guimarães Martins, Annaiza Freitas Lopes de Araújo, Maria Isabel da Conceição Dias Fernandes, Marcos Venícios de Oliveira Lopes, Ana Luisa Brandão de Carvalho Lira","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of clinical indicators and etiological factors associated with the nursing diagnosis of ineffective overweight self-management among university students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A diagnostic accuracy study with a cross-sectional design was conducted with 108 university students. A latent class analysis model with random effects was used to establish sensitivity and specificity measures of clinical indicators, estimate the prevalence of the diagnosis, and calculate posterior probabilities for the diagnosis. Odds ratios for etiological factors were calculated using univariate logistic regression. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the responsible institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nursing diagnosis of ineffective overweight self-management had an estimated prevalence of 38.1% in the sample. Sensitive clinical indicators included excessive calorie consumption (0.9514) and dissatisfaction with body image (0.8834). Specific indicators included negative self-perception of health (0.9999), inadequate eating behavior (0.9990), and impaired emotional health (0.8273). A personal history of overweight (OR = 2.78; p-value = 0.018) increased the likelihood of developing ineffective overweight self-management by approximately two and a half times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ineffective overweight self-management is prevalent among university students and is characterized by two sensitive clinical indicators, three specific indicators, and a population at risk that increases the likelihood of this diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>Accurate clinical indicators and the identification of etiological factors for the diagnosis of ineffective overweight self-management support nurses' clinical reasoning in practice. Moreover, verifying accurate components for diagnosing ineffective overweight self-management contributes to the development of interventions aimed at promoting the health of university students.</p>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of clinical indicators and etiological factors associated with the nursing diagnosis of ineffective overweight self-management among university students.

Method: A diagnostic accuracy study with a cross-sectional design was conducted with 108 university students. A latent class analysis model with random effects was used to establish sensitivity and specificity measures of clinical indicators, estimate the prevalence of the diagnosis, and calculate posterior probabilities for the diagnosis. Odds ratios for etiological factors were calculated using univariate logistic regression. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the responsible institution.

Results: The nursing diagnosis of ineffective overweight self-management had an estimated prevalence of 38.1% in the sample. Sensitive clinical indicators included excessive calorie consumption (0.9514) and dissatisfaction with body image (0.8834). Specific indicators included negative self-perception of health (0.9999), inadequate eating behavior (0.9990), and impaired emotional health (0.8273). A personal history of overweight (OR = 2.78; p-value = 0.018) increased the likelihood of developing ineffective overweight self-management by approximately two and a half times.

Conclusion: Ineffective overweight self-management is prevalent among university students and is characterized by two sensitive clinical indicators, three specific indicators, and a population at risk that increases the likelihood of this diagnosis.

Implications for nursing practice: Accurate clinical indicators and the identification of etiological factors for the diagnosis of ineffective overweight self-management support nurses' clinical reasoning in practice. Moreover, verifying accurate components for diagnosing ineffective overweight self-management contributes to the development of interventions aimed at promoting the health of university students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无效的超重自我管理:诊断准确性和病因关系研究。
目的:评估大学生超重自我管理无效护理诊断相关临床指标和病因学因素的准确性:方法:对 108 名大学生进行横断面设计的诊断准确性研究。采用随机效应潜类分析模型确定临床指标的灵敏度和特异度,估计诊断的流行率,并计算诊断的后验概率。使用单变量逻辑回归法计算了病因因素的比值比。该研究已获得主管机构研究伦理委员会的批准:在样本中,超重自我管理无效这一护理诊断的发病率估计为 38.1%。敏感临床指标包括热量消耗过多(0.9514)和对身体形象不满意(0.8834)。具体指标包括对健康的负面自我认知(0.9999)、饮食行为不当(0.9990)和情绪健康受损(0.8273)。个人超重史(OR = 2.78;P 值 = 0.018)使出现无效超重自我管理的可能性增加了约 2.5 倍:结论:无效的超重自我管理在大学生中普遍存在,其特点是有两个敏感的临床指标、三个特殊指标和一个风险人群,这些都增加了这种诊断的可能性:对护理实践的启示:诊断超重自我管理无效的准确临床指标和致病因素的确定有助于护士在实践中进行临床推理。此外,验证诊断无效超重自我管理的准确要素有助于制定旨在促进大学生健康的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
期刊最新文献
"Ineffective breastfeeding (00104)" and "Readiness for enhanced breastfeeding (00106)": Clinical validation. Auriculotherapy nursing intervention: Development and content validation by specialists. Ineffective overweight self-management: A study of diagnostic accuracy and etiological relationships. Nursing diagnosis of risk for elopement attempt: A content validation study. Enhancing nursing care through technology and standardized nursing language: The TEC-MED multilingual platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1