A Methodological Review of Stimuli Used for Classroom Speech-in-Noise Tests.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00261
Kiri Mealings, Kelly Miles, Joerg M Buchholz
{"title":"A Methodological Review of Stimuli Used for Classroom Speech-in-Noise Tests.","authors":"Kiri Mealings, Kelly Miles, Joerg M Buchholz","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Listening is the gateway to learning in the mainstream classroom; however, classrooms are noisy environments, making listening challenging. Therefore, speech-in-noise tests that realistically incorporate the complexity of the classroom listening environment are needed. The aim of this article was to review the speech stimuli, noise stimuli, presentation mode, and presentation levels of current classroom speech-in-noise tests to determine how representative they are of real-world classroom listening.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive search of Scopus database following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was conducted to identify classroom speech-in-noise tests used in the research literature. The search term was <i>classroom AND (listening OR (speech AND (perception OR intelligibility OR recognition OR discrimination) AND noise) OR speech-in-noise) AND (test OR task OR measure OR assessment) AND children</i> in the article title, abstract, and key word fields<i>.</i></p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97 papers met the criteria to be included in the review. While the speech and noise stimuli were generally presented at realistic speech and noise levels, the speech materials were not representative of real-world classroom listening. Additionally, unrealistic noise and presentation modes were used in several studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review will help researchers choose appropriate speech-in-noise test stimuli in future research and also help researchers understand what to consider when creating new speech-in-noise tests for classroom listening.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27659619.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Listening is the gateway to learning in the mainstream classroom; however, classrooms are noisy environments, making listening challenging. Therefore, speech-in-noise tests that realistically incorporate the complexity of the classroom listening environment are needed. The aim of this article was to review the speech stimuli, noise stimuli, presentation mode, and presentation levels of current classroom speech-in-noise tests to determine how representative they are of real-world classroom listening.

Method: A comprehensive search of Scopus database following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was conducted to identify classroom speech-in-noise tests used in the research literature. The search term was classroom AND (listening OR (speech AND (perception OR intelligibility OR recognition OR discrimination) AND noise) OR speech-in-noise) AND (test OR task OR measure OR assessment) AND children in the article title, abstract, and key word fields.

Results: A total of 97 papers met the criteria to be included in the review. While the speech and noise stimuli were generally presented at realistic speech and noise levels, the speech materials were not representative of real-world classroom listening. Additionally, unrealistic noise and presentation modes were used in several studies.

Conclusion: This review will help researchers choose appropriate speech-in-noise test stimuli in future research and also help researchers understand what to consider when creating new speech-in-noise tests for classroom listening.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27659619.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对课堂噪音中的语音测试所使用的刺激物进行方法回顾。
目的:在主流课堂上,听力是学习的关口;然而,教室是一个嘈杂的环境,这使得听力具有挑战性。因此,我们需要能真实反映课堂听力环境复杂性的噪声语音测试。本文旨在对目前课堂噪音语音测试的语音刺激、噪音刺激、呈现模式和呈现水平进行回顾,以确定它们在多大程度上代表了真实世界的课堂听力:方法:按照《系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews)指南,对 Scopus 数据库进行了全面检索,以确定研究文献中使用的课堂噪音语音测试。检索词为教室和(听力或(语音和(感知或清晰度或识别或辨别)和噪音)或噪音中的语音)和(测试或任务或测量或评估)和文章标题、摘要和关键词字段中的儿童:共有 97 篇论文符合纳入综述的标准。虽然语音和噪音刺激一般都以真实的语音和噪音水平呈现,但语音材料并不代表真实的课堂听力。此外,一些研究还使用了不切实际的噪音和演示模式:本综述将有助于研究人员在今后的研究中选择合适的噪声语音测试刺激物,也有助于研究人员了解在为课堂听力设计新的噪声语音测试时应考虑哪些因素。补充材料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27659619。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
期刊最新文献
A Methodological Review of Stimuli Used for Classroom Speech-in-Noise Tests. Cochlear Implant Sound Quality. Aerodynamic Threshold Measures for Reflecting Glottal Closure in Voice Disorders. Characterizing Physiologic Swallowing Impairment Profiles: A Large-Scale Exploratory Study of Head and Neck Cancer, Stroke, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease. Linguistic Markers of Subtle Cognitive Impairment in Connected Speech: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1