Metagenomic insights into nitrite accumulation in sulfur-based denitrification systems utilizing different electron donors: functional microbial communities and metabolic mechanisms
{"title":"Metagenomic insights into nitrite accumulation in sulfur-based denitrification systems utilizing different electron donors: functional microbial communities and metabolic mechanisms","authors":"Jiahui Wang, Fangzhai Zhang, Zhaozhi Wang, Haoran Liang, Ziyi Du, Yujing Zhang, Hongying Lu, Yongzhen Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification (SADN) offers new pathway for nitrite supply. However, sequential transformation of nitrogen and sulfur forms, and the functional microorganisms driving nitrite accumulation in SADN with different reduced inorganic sulfur compounds (RISCs), remain unclear. Desirable nitrite accumulation was achieved using elemental sulfur (S<sup>0</sup>-group), sulfide (S<sup>2-</sup>-group) and thiosulfate (S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>-group) as electron donors. Under equivalent electron supply conditions, S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>-group exhibited a superior nitrate conversion rate (NCR) of 0.285 kg N/(m³·d) compared to S<sup>2-</sup>-group (0.103 kg N/(m³·d)). Lower NCR in S<sup>2-</sup>-group was attributed to sulfide strongly inhibiting energy metabolism process of TCA cycle, resulting in reduced reaction rates. Moreover, the NCR of S<sup>0</sup>-group (0.035 kg N/(m³·d)) was poor due to the chemical inertness of S<sup>0</sup>. Specific microbial communities were selectively enriched in phylum level, with <em>Proteobacteria</em> increasing to an astonished 96.27-98.49%. Comprehensive analyses of functional genus, genes, and metabolic pathways revealed significant variability in the active functional genus, with even the same genus showed significant metabolic differences in response to different RISCs. In S<sup>0</sup>-group, <em>Thiomonas</em> (10.0%) and <em>Acidithiobacillus</em> (5.1%) were the primary contributor to nitrite accumulation. <em>Thiobacillus</em> was the most abundant sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in S<sup>2-</sup>-group (43.84%) and S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>-group (18.92%). In S<sup>2-</sup>-group, it contributed to nitrite accumulation, while in S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>-group, it acted as a complete denitrifier (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>-N→N<sub>2</sub>). Notably, heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria, <em>Comamonas</em> (12.52%), were crucial for nitrite accumulation in S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2-</sup>-group, predominating <em>NarG</em> while lacking <em>NirK/S</em>. Overall, this work advances our understanding of SADN systems with different RISCs, offering insights for optimizing nitrogen and sulfur removal.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification (SADN) offers new pathway for nitrite supply. However, sequential transformation of nitrogen and sulfur forms, and the functional microorganisms driving nitrite accumulation in SADN with different reduced inorganic sulfur compounds (RISCs), remain unclear. Desirable nitrite accumulation was achieved using elemental sulfur (S0-group), sulfide (S2--group) and thiosulfate (S2O32--group) as electron donors. Under equivalent electron supply conditions, S2O32--group exhibited a superior nitrate conversion rate (NCR) of 0.285 kg N/(m³·d) compared to S2--group (0.103 kg N/(m³·d)). Lower NCR in S2--group was attributed to sulfide strongly inhibiting energy metabolism process of TCA cycle, resulting in reduced reaction rates. Moreover, the NCR of S0-group (0.035 kg N/(m³·d)) was poor due to the chemical inertness of S0. Specific microbial communities were selectively enriched in phylum level, with Proteobacteria increasing to an astonished 96.27-98.49%. Comprehensive analyses of functional genus, genes, and metabolic pathways revealed significant variability in the active functional genus, with even the same genus showed significant metabolic differences in response to different RISCs. In S0-group, Thiomonas (10.0%) and Acidithiobacillus (5.1%) were the primary contributor to nitrite accumulation. Thiobacillus was the most abundant sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in S2--group (43.84%) and S2O32--group (18.92%). In S2--group, it contributed to nitrite accumulation, while in S2O32--group, it acted as a complete denitrifier (NO3--N→N2). Notably, heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria, Comamonas (12.52%), were crucial for nitrite accumulation in S2O32--group, predominating NarG while lacking NirK/S. Overall, this work advances our understanding of SADN systems with different RISCs, offering insights for optimizing nitrogen and sulfur removal.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.