An iterative approach for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities from large scale online cognitive data

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01327-x
Valentina Giunchiglia, Dragos-Cristian Gruia, Annalaura Lerede, William Trender, Peter Hellyer, Adam Hampshire
{"title":"An iterative approach for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities from large scale online cognitive data","authors":"Valentina Giunchiglia, Dragos-Cristian Gruia, Annalaura Lerede, William Trender, Peter Hellyer, Adam Hampshire","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01327-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Online cognitive tasks are gaining traction as scalable and cost-effective alternatives to traditional supervised assessments. However, variability in peoples’ home devices, visual and motor abilities, and speed-accuracy biases confound the specificity with which online tasks can measure cognitive abilities. To address these limitations, we developed IDoCT (Iterative Decomposition of Cognitive Tasks), a method for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities and trial-difficulty scales from task performance timecourses in a data-driven manner while accounting for device and visuomotor latencies, unspecific cognitive processes and speed-accuracy trade-offs. IDoCT can operate with any computerised task where cognitive difficulty varies across trials. Using data from 388,757 adults, we show that IDoCT successfully dissociates cognitive abilities from these confounding factors. The resultant cognitive scores exhibit stronger dissociation of psychometric factors, improved cross-participants distributions, and meaningful demographic’s associations. We propose that IDoCT can enhance the precision of online cognitive assessments, especially in large scale clinical and research applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01327-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online cognitive tasks are gaining traction as scalable and cost-effective alternatives to traditional supervised assessments. However, variability in peoples’ home devices, visual and motor abilities, and speed-accuracy biases confound the specificity with which online tasks can measure cognitive abilities. To address these limitations, we developed IDoCT (Iterative Decomposition of Cognitive Tasks), a method for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities and trial-difficulty scales from task performance timecourses in a data-driven manner while accounting for device and visuomotor latencies, unspecific cognitive processes and speed-accuracy trade-offs. IDoCT can operate with any computerised task where cognitive difficulty varies across trials. Using data from 388,757 adults, we show that IDoCT successfully dissociates cognitive abilities from these confounding factors. The resultant cognitive scores exhibit stronger dissociation of psychometric factors, improved cross-participants distributions, and meaningful demographic’s associations. We propose that IDoCT can enhance the precision of online cognitive assessments, especially in large scale clinical and research applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从大规模在线认知数据中估算特定领域认知能力的迭代方法
在线认知任务作为传统监督评估的一种可扩展且具有成本效益的替代方法,正受到越来越多的关注。然而,由于人们的家用设备、视觉和运动能力存在差异,加上速度-准确性偏差,在线任务在测量认知能力方面的特异性受到了限制。为了解决这些局限性,我们开发了 IDoCT(认知任务迭代分解),这是一种以数据驱动的方式从任务表现时程中估算特定领域认知能力和试验难度等级的方法,同时考虑了设备和视觉运动潜伏期、非特定认知过程以及速度-准确性权衡。IDoCT 可用于任何认知难度在不同试验中存在差异的计算机化任务。我们利用 388,757 名成人的数据表明,IDoCT 成功地将认知能力与这些干扰因素分离开来。由此得出的认知分数显示出更强的心理测量因素分离能力、更好的跨参与者分布以及有意义的人口统计学关联。我们建议 IDoCT 可以提高在线认知评估的精确度,尤其是在大规模临床和研究应用中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
An iterative approach for estimating domain-specific cognitive abilities from large scale online cognitive data Interpretable machine learning model for digital lung cancer prescreening in Chinese populations with missing data Developing a Canadian artificial intelligence medical curriculum using a Delphi study Reinforcement learning model for optimizing dexmedetomidine dosing to prevent delirium in critically ill patients A strategy for cost-effective large language model use at health system-scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1