Margaret G. O’Connell, Neha Rajendran, Menachem Elimelech, Jack Gilron, Jennifer B. Dunn
{"title":"Analysis of energy, water, land and cost implications of zero and minimal liquid discharge desalination technologies","authors":"Margaret G. O’Connell, Neha Rajendran, Menachem Elimelech, Jack Gilron, Jennifer B. Dunn","doi":"10.1038/s44221-024-00327-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Desalination is increasingly essential to ensure access to water as climate change and population growth stress fresh water supplies. Already in use in water-stressed regions around the world, desalination generates fresh water from salty sources, and in doing so forms a concentrated brine that requires disposal. There is a growing push for the adoption of zero/minimal liquid discharge (ZLD/MLD) technologies that recover additional water from this brine, thereby reducing the liquid volumes requiring disposal. In this analysis, we evaluated the cost, energy and sustainability impacts of 7 overarching treatment trains with 75 different configurations. We found ZLD/MLD water recoveries ranging from 32.6% to 98.6%, but with steep energy and cost trade-offs that underscore the crucial roles of ion-specific separations, heat integration and clean energy sources. We explored the key trade-offs between cost, energy and water recovery, elucidating the increasingly tight connections that are central to the energy–water nexus and desalination. Desalination brine remains a challenge that zero/minimal liquid discharge aims to solve. Spanning 75 treatment scenarios, this analysis evaluates the trade-offs that underscore the crucial roles of ion specificity, heat integration and clean energy.","PeriodicalId":74252,"journal":{"name":"Nature water","volume":"2 11","pages":"1116-1127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-024-00327-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-024-00327-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Desalination is increasingly essential to ensure access to water as climate change and population growth stress fresh water supplies. Already in use in water-stressed regions around the world, desalination generates fresh water from salty sources, and in doing so forms a concentrated brine that requires disposal. There is a growing push for the adoption of zero/minimal liquid discharge (ZLD/MLD) technologies that recover additional water from this brine, thereby reducing the liquid volumes requiring disposal. In this analysis, we evaluated the cost, energy and sustainability impacts of 7 overarching treatment trains with 75 different configurations. We found ZLD/MLD water recoveries ranging from 32.6% to 98.6%, but with steep energy and cost trade-offs that underscore the crucial roles of ion-specific separations, heat integration and clean energy sources. We explored the key trade-offs between cost, energy and water recovery, elucidating the increasingly tight connections that are central to the energy–water nexus and desalination. Desalination brine remains a challenge that zero/minimal liquid discharge aims to solve. Spanning 75 treatment scenarios, this analysis evaluates the trade-offs that underscore the crucial roles of ion specificity, heat integration and clean energy.