Jonathan D. Beverley, Matthew Newman, Andrew Hoell
{"title":"Climate model trend errors are evident in seasonal forecasts at short leads","authors":"Jonathan D. Beverley, Matthew Newman, Andrew Hoell","doi":"10.1038/s41612-024-00832-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate models exhibit errors in their simulation of historical trends of variables including sea surface temperature, winds, and precipitation, with important implications for regional and global climate projections. Here, we show that the same trend errors are also present in a suite of initialised seasonal re-forecasts for the years 1993–2016. These re-forecasts are produced by operational models that are similar to Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP)-class models and share their historical external forcings (e.g. CO2/aerosols). The trend errors, which are often well-developed at very short lead times, represent a roughly linear change in the model mean biases over the 1993–2016 re-forecast record. The similarity of trend errors in both the re-forecasts and historical simulations suggests that climate model trend errors likewise result from evolving mean biases, responding to changing external radiative forcings, instead of being an erroneous long-term response to external forcing. Therefore, these trend errors may be investigated by examining their short-lead development in initialised seasonal forecasts/re-forecasts, which we suggest should also be made by all CMIP models.","PeriodicalId":19438,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00832-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate and Atmospheric Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-024-00832-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Climate models exhibit errors in their simulation of historical trends of variables including sea surface temperature, winds, and precipitation, with important implications for regional and global climate projections. Here, we show that the same trend errors are also present in a suite of initialised seasonal re-forecasts for the years 1993–2016. These re-forecasts are produced by operational models that are similar to Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP)-class models and share their historical external forcings (e.g. CO2/aerosols). The trend errors, which are often well-developed at very short lead times, represent a roughly linear change in the model mean biases over the 1993–2016 re-forecast record. The similarity of trend errors in both the re-forecasts and historical simulations suggests that climate model trend errors likewise result from evolving mean biases, responding to changing external radiative forcings, instead of being an erroneous long-term response to external forcing. Therefore, these trend errors may be investigated by examining their short-lead development in initialised seasonal forecasts/re-forecasts, which we suggest should also be made by all CMIP models.
期刊介绍:
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science is an open-access journal encompassing the relevant physical, chemical, and biological aspects of atmospheric and climate science. The journal places particular emphasis on regional studies that unveil new insights into specific localities, including examinations of local atmospheric composition, such as aerosols.
The range of topics covered by the journal includes climate dynamics, climate variability, weather and climate prediction, climate change, ocean dynamics, weather extremes, air pollution, atmospheric chemistry (including aerosols), the hydrological cycle, and atmosphere–ocean and atmosphere–land interactions. The journal welcomes studies employing a diverse array of methods, including numerical and statistical modeling, the development and application of in situ observational techniques, remote sensing, and the development or evaluation of new reanalyses.