{"title":"Biomarkers for Cognitive Control, Response Inhibition, Aggressivity, Impulsivity, and Violence.","authors":"Matthew J Hoptman, Ragy R Girgis, Daniel C Javitt","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deficits in cognitive control contribute to behavioral impairments across neuropsychiatric disorders. Cognitive control is captured as a construct in the Research Domain Construct (RDoC) matrix and incorporate subdomains of goal selection, response selection, and performance monitoring. Relevant tasks for these subdomains include the \"AX\" version of the continuous performance task (goal selection) and the Go/NoGo and Stop-Signal reaction time tasks (response selection). Underlying mechanisms for these domains have been investigated intensively using fMRI and event-related potential (ERP) approaches, which provide candidate biomarkers for translational research. In RDoC, impulsive behaviors are provisionally assigned to the cognitive control/response selection construct, but other factors may also contribute. Impulsivity has gained increased importance over recent years due to its link to aggression and suicidality, which is mediated especially through the constructs of urgency and frustrative nonreward. These constructs, in turn, may be captured through scales such as the Urgency, (Lack of) Premeditation, (Lack of) Perseverance, and Sensation Seeking (UPPS-P) impulsivity scale and the Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm (PSAP), respectively. At present, no validated biomarkers exist for either urgency or aggressivity. Potential directions for the development of predictive biomarkers for both targets are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7360,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neurobiology","volume":"40 ","pages":"725-756"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69491-2_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deficits in cognitive control contribute to behavioral impairments across neuropsychiatric disorders. Cognitive control is captured as a construct in the Research Domain Construct (RDoC) matrix and incorporate subdomains of goal selection, response selection, and performance monitoring. Relevant tasks for these subdomains include the "AX" version of the continuous performance task (goal selection) and the Go/NoGo and Stop-Signal reaction time tasks (response selection). Underlying mechanisms for these domains have been investigated intensively using fMRI and event-related potential (ERP) approaches, which provide candidate biomarkers for translational research. In RDoC, impulsive behaviors are provisionally assigned to the cognitive control/response selection construct, but other factors may also contribute. Impulsivity has gained increased importance over recent years due to its link to aggression and suicidality, which is mediated especially through the constructs of urgency and frustrative nonreward. These constructs, in turn, may be captured through scales such as the Urgency, (Lack of) Premeditation, (Lack of) Perseverance, and Sensation Seeking (UPPS-P) impulsivity scale and the Point Subtraction Aggression Paradigm (PSAP), respectively. At present, no validated biomarkers exist for either urgency or aggressivity. Potential directions for the development of predictive biomarkers for both targets are discussed.