JYNNEOS vaccine safety surveillance in the vaccine safety datalink during the 2022 mpox outbreak in the United States.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1007/s15010-024-02428-1
Jonathan Duffy, W Katherine Yih, Kimp Walton, Malini B DeSilva, Jason M Glanz, Simon J Hambidge, Lisa A Jackson, Nicola P Klein, Bruno J Lewin, Allison L Naleway, Maria E Sundaram, Judith C Maro, Eric Weintraub
{"title":"JYNNEOS vaccine safety surveillance in the vaccine safety datalink during the 2022 mpox outbreak in the United States.","authors":"Jonathan Duffy, W Katherine Yih, Kimp Walton, Malini B DeSilva, Jason M Glanz, Simon J Hambidge, Lisa A Jackson, Nicola P Klein, Bruno J Lewin, Allison L Naleway, Maria E Sundaram, Judith C Maro, Eric Weintraub","doi":"10.1007/s15010-024-02428-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The JYNNEOS vaccine (two doses given 28 days apart) was recommended in the United States for people at high risk of exposure to monkeypox virus during the 2022 mpox outbreak. Our objective was to assess the safety of JYNNEOS using two complementary epidemiologic methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort included patients of eight large integrated healthcare organizations who received JYNNEOS. Adverse events were identified using ICD-10 coded diagnoses assigned to medical visits. The first analysis used standardized incidence ratios (SIR) to compare the observed incidence of ten prespecified adverse events of special interest (AESI) during the 28 days after receipt of each dose of JYNNEOS to the expected incidence adjusted for several risk factors. The second analysis used tree-based data mining to identify temporal clustering of cases for more than 60,000 diagnoses and diagnosis groups within 70-days after JYNNEOS dose 1 administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SIR analysis included 53,583 adults who received JYNNEOS dose 1 and 38,206 who received dose 2. Males received 92% of the doses. There were no statistically significant elevated SIRs for any of the ten AESI. The tree-based data mining analysis included 36,912 vaccinees. Analysis of diagnoses in inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient settings identified statistically significant clusters of visits for rash and unspecified adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No new or unexpected safety concerns were identified. AESI did not occur more frequently than expected by chance alone. Non-serious medically attended adverse events, such as rash, have been previously reported and occurred infrequently.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-024-02428-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The JYNNEOS vaccine (two doses given 28 days apart) was recommended in the United States for people at high risk of exposure to monkeypox virus during the 2022 mpox outbreak. Our objective was to assess the safety of JYNNEOS using two complementary epidemiologic methods.

Methods: This observational cohort included patients of eight large integrated healthcare organizations who received JYNNEOS. Adverse events were identified using ICD-10 coded diagnoses assigned to medical visits. The first analysis used standardized incidence ratios (SIR) to compare the observed incidence of ten prespecified adverse events of special interest (AESI) during the 28 days after receipt of each dose of JYNNEOS to the expected incidence adjusted for several risk factors. The second analysis used tree-based data mining to identify temporal clustering of cases for more than 60,000 diagnoses and diagnosis groups within 70-days after JYNNEOS dose 1 administration.

Results: The SIR analysis included 53,583 adults who received JYNNEOS dose 1 and 38,206 who received dose 2. Males received 92% of the doses. There were no statistically significant elevated SIRs for any of the ten AESI. The tree-based data mining analysis included 36,912 vaccinees. Analysis of diagnoses in inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient settings identified statistically significant clusters of visits for rash and unspecified adverse effects.

Conclusions: No new or unexpected safety concerns were identified. AESI did not occur more frequently than expected by chance alone. Non-serious medically attended adverse events, such as rash, have been previously reported and occurred infrequently.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国 2022 年麻风腮疫情爆发期间,疫苗安全数据链中的 JYNNEOS 疫苗安全监测。
背景:在 2022 年猴痘爆发期间,美国建议接触猴痘病毒的高危人群接种 JYNNEOS 疫苗(两次接种间隔 28 天)。我们的目标是使用两种互补的流行病学方法评估JYNNEOS的安全性:该观察性队列包括8家大型综合医疗机构中接受过JYNNEOS治疗的患者。不良事件通过对就诊进行 ICD-10 编码诊断来确定。第一项分析采用标准化发病率比(SIR),将接受每剂 JYNNEOS 后 28 天内观察到的十种预先指定的特殊关注不良事件(AESI)的发病率与根据几种风险因素调整后的预期发病率进行比较。第二项分析采用基于树状结构的数据挖掘方法,以确定在服用第一剂 JYNNEOS 后 70 天内 60,000 多个诊断和诊断组的病例时间聚类:SIR分析包括53,583名接受JYNNEOS剂量1的成人和38,206名接受剂量2的成人。男性接受了 92% 的剂量。在 10 项 AESI 中,没有任何一项出现统计学意义上的 SIR 升高。基于树的数据挖掘分析包括 36,912 名接种者。对住院病人、急诊科和门诊病人的诊断分析发现,因皮疹和不明不良反应就诊的人群具有统计学意义:结论:没有发现新的或意外的安全问题。结论:没有发现新的或意想不到的安全问题,AESI 的发生率也没有超出预期。皮疹等非严重医疗不良事件以前也有报道,但发生率不高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Prophylactic vs preemptive strategy for the prevention of CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SeptAsTERS- SeptiCyte® RAPID as assessment tool for early recognition of sepsis - a prospective observational study. JYNNEOS vaccine safety surveillance in the vaccine safety datalink during the 2022 mpox outbreak in the United States. Post-COVID recovery is faster after an infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: a population-based cohort study. Rare and risky: a unique case of concurrent chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and lemierre syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1