Who can benefit more from its twelve-week treatment: A prospective cohort study of blonanserin for patients with schizophrenia.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY World Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.5498/wjp.v14.i11.1735
Bao-Yan Xu, Kun Jin, Hai-Shan Wu, Xue-Jun Liu, Xi-Jin Wang, Hong Sang, Ke-Qing Li, Mei-Juan Sun, Hua-Qing Meng, Huai-Li Deng, Zhi-Yuan Xun, Xiao-Dong Yang, Lin Zhang, Guan-Jun Li, Rui-Ling Zhang, Duan-Fang Cai, Jia-Hong Liu, Gui-Jun Zhao, Long-Fa Liu, Gang Wang, Chang-Lie Zhao, Bin Guo, Sheng-Chun Jin, Ling-Yun Huang, Fu-De Yang, Jian-Min Zheng, Gui-Lai Zhan, Mao-Sheng Fang, Xiang-Jun Meng, Guang-Ya Zhang, Hai-Min Li, Xiang-Lai Liu, Ju-Hong Li, Bin Wu, Hai-Yun Li, Jin-Dong Chen
{"title":"Who can benefit more from its twelve-week treatment: A prospective cohort study of blonanserin for patients with schizophrenia.","authors":"Bao-Yan Xu, Kun Jin, Hai-Shan Wu, Xue-Jun Liu, Xi-Jin Wang, Hong Sang, Ke-Qing Li, Mei-Juan Sun, Hua-Qing Meng, Huai-Li Deng, Zhi-Yuan Xun, Xiao-Dong Yang, Lin Zhang, Guan-Jun Li, Rui-Ling Zhang, Duan-Fang Cai, Jia-Hong Liu, Gui-Jun Zhao, Long-Fa Liu, Gang Wang, Chang-Lie Zhao, Bin Guo, Sheng-Chun Jin, Ling-Yun Huang, Fu-De Yang, Jian-Min Zheng, Gui-Lai Zhan, Mao-Sheng Fang, Xiang-Jun Meng, Guang-Ya Zhang, Hai-Min Li, Xiang-Lai Liu, Ju-Hong Li, Bin Wu, Hai-Yun Li, Jin-Dong Chen","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v14.i11.1735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blonanserin (BNS) is a well-tolerated and effective drug for treating schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate which types of patients would obtain the most benefit from BNS treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 3306 participants were evaluated in a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, open-label post-marketing surveillance study of BNS. Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) scores were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of BNS, and its safety was assessed with the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Linear regression was used to screen the influencing factors for the reduction of BPRS total score, and logistic regression was used to identify patients with a better response to BNS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline BPRS total score (48.8 ± 15.03) decreased to 27.7 ± 10.08 at 12 weeks (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Extrapyramidal symptoms (14.6%) were found to be the most frequent adverse drug reactions. The acute phase, baseline BPRS total score, current episode duration, number of previous episodes, dose of concomitant antipsychotics, and number of types of sedative-hypnotic agents were found to be independent factors affecting the reduction of BPRS total score after treatment initiation. Specifically, patients in the acute phase with baseline BPRS total score ≥ 45, current episode duration < 3 months, and ≤ 3 previous episodes derived greater benefit from 12-week treatment with BNS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients in the acute phase with more severe symptoms, shorter current episode duration, fewer previous episodes, and a lower psychotropic drug load derived the greatest benefit from treatment with BNS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"14 11","pages":"1735-1745"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i11.1735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blonanserin (BNS) is a well-tolerated and effective drug for treating schizophrenia.

Aim: To investigate which types of patients would obtain the most benefit from BNS treatment.

Methods: A total of 3306 participants were evaluated in a 12-week, prospective, multicenter, open-label post-marketing surveillance study of BNS. Brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) scores were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of BNS, and its safety was assessed with the incidence of adverse drug reactions. Linear regression was used to screen the influencing factors for the reduction of BPRS total score, and logistic regression was used to identify patients with a better response to BNS.

Results: The baseline BPRS total score (48.8 ± 15.03) decreased to 27.7 ± 10.08 at 12 weeks (P < 0.001). Extrapyramidal symptoms (14.6%) were found to be the most frequent adverse drug reactions. The acute phase, baseline BPRS total score, current episode duration, number of previous episodes, dose of concomitant antipsychotics, and number of types of sedative-hypnotic agents were found to be independent factors affecting the reduction of BPRS total score after treatment initiation. Specifically, patients in the acute phase with baseline BPRS total score ≥ 45, current episode duration < 3 months, and ≤ 3 previous episodes derived greater benefit from 12-week treatment with BNS.

Conclusion: Patients in the acute phase with more severe symptoms, shorter current episode duration, fewer previous episodes, and a lower psychotropic drug load derived the greatest benefit from treatment with BNS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁能从为期十二周的治疗中获益更多:针对精神分裂症患者的布洛南色林前瞻性队列研究。
背景:布洛南色林(BNS)是一种耐受性良好且有效的治疗精神分裂症的药物。目的:研究哪类患者能从BNS治疗中获得最大益处:在一项为期 12 周的前瞻性、多中心、开放标签的 BNS 上市后监测研究中,共对 3306 名参与者进行了评估。通过计算简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)评分来评估 BNS 的有效性,并通过药物不良反应的发生率来评估其安全性。线性回归用于筛选BPRS总分降低的影响因素,逻辑回归用于识别对BNS反应较好的患者:基线 BPRS 总分(48.8 ± 15.03)在 12 周时降至 27.7 ± 10.08(P < 0.001)。锥体外系症状(14.6%)是最常见的药物不良反应。研究发现,急性期、基线BPRS总分、当前发作持续时间、既往发作次数、同时使用的抗精神病药物剂量以及镇静催眠药种类的数量是影响治疗开始后BPRS总分降低的独立因素。具体而言,基线BPRS总分≥45分、当前发作持续时间小于3个月、既往发作次数少于3次的急性期患者从为期12周的BNS治疗中获益更大:结论:症状更严重、当前发作持续时间更短、既往发作次数更少、精神药物负荷更低的急性期患者从 BNS 治疗中获益最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Challenges in the management of visual and tactile hallucinations in elderly people. Clinical value of combining epirubicin with mindfulness intervention in patients with urinary system tumors and depression. Association of stent thrombectomy and conventional treatment with neuroprotection, complications, anxiety, and depression in acute ischemic stroke patients. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor alterations and cognitive decline in schizophrenia: Implications for early intervention. Burden of mental disorders and risk factors in the Western Pacific region from 1990 to 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1