A Novel Approach Based on Integrating Radiomics, Bone Morphometry and Hounsfield Unit-Derived From Routine Chest CT for Bone Mineral Density Assessment.
{"title":"A Novel Approach Based on Integrating Radiomics, Bone Morphometry and Hounsfield Unit-Derived From Routine Chest CT for Bone Mineral Density Assessment.","authors":"Mahmoud Mohammadi-Sadr, Mohsen Cheki, Masoud Moslehi, Marziyeh Zarasvandnia, Mohammad Reza Salamat","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is the feasibility of using radiomics features, bone morphometry features (BM), and Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained from routine chest computed tomography (CT) for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 120 patients who underwent routine chest CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations within a month. Whole thoracic vertebral bodies from routine chest CT images were segmented using the GrowCut semi-automatic segmentation method, and radiomics features, BM features, and HU values were extracted. To assess the intra- and inter-observer variability of segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was utilized. Feature selection was carried out using the intra-class correlation coefficient and the Boruta algorithm. Six machine learning classification models were employed for classification in a three-class manner. The models' performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC). Other evaluation parameters of the models were calculated, including overall accuracy, precision, and sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DSC values showed high similarity by achieving 0.907 ± 0.034 and 0.887 ± 0.048 for intra- and inter-observer segmentation agreement, respectively. After a two-stepwise feature selection, 21 radiomics features were selected. Different combinations of these radiomics features with five BM features and HU values were applied to six classification models for evaluating BMD. The multilayer perceptron (MLP) model based on integration of radiomics features and BM features in a three-class classification approach achieved higher performance compared to other models with an AUC of 0.981 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.937-0.997) in normal BMD class, an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.826-0.944) in osteopenia class, and an AUC of 0.927 (95% CI: 0.866-0.967) in osteoporosis class.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the MLP classification model based on a combination of radiomics features and BM features in a three-class classification approach can effectively distinguish different BMD conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: The purpose of this study is the feasibility of using radiomics features, bone morphometry features (BM), and Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained from routine chest computed tomography (CT) for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) status.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 120 patients who underwent routine chest CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations within a month. Whole thoracic vertebral bodies from routine chest CT images were segmented using the GrowCut semi-automatic segmentation method, and radiomics features, BM features, and HU values were extracted. To assess the intra- and inter-observer variability of segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was utilized. Feature selection was carried out using the intra-class correlation coefficient and the Boruta algorithm. Six machine learning classification models were employed for classification in a three-class manner. The models' performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC). Other evaluation parameters of the models were calculated, including overall accuracy, precision, and sensitivity.
Results: The DSC values showed high similarity by achieving 0.907 ± 0.034 and 0.887 ± 0.048 for intra- and inter-observer segmentation agreement, respectively. After a two-stepwise feature selection, 21 radiomics features were selected. Different combinations of these radiomics features with five BM features and HU values were applied to six classification models for evaluating BMD. The multilayer perceptron (MLP) model based on integration of radiomics features and BM features in a three-class classification approach achieved higher performance compared to other models with an AUC of 0.981 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.937-0.997) in normal BMD class, an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.826-0.944) in osteopenia class, and an AUC of 0.927 (95% CI: 0.866-0.967) in osteoporosis class.
Conclusion: Using the MLP classification model based on a combination of radiomics features and BM features in a three-class classification approach can effectively distinguish different BMD conditions.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.