A Novel Approach Based on Integrating Radiomics, Bone Morphometry and Hounsfield Unit-Derived From Routine Chest CT for Bone Mineral Density Assessment.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.049
Mahmoud Mohammadi-Sadr, Mohsen Cheki, Masoud Moslehi, Marziyeh Zarasvandnia, Mohammad Reza Salamat
{"title":"A Novel Approach Based on Integrating Radiomics, Bone Morphometry and Hounsfield Unit-Derived From Routine Chest CT for Bone Mineral Density Assessment.","authors":"Mahmoud Mohammadi-Sadr, Mohsen Cheki, Masoud Moslehi, Marziyeh Zarasvandnia, Mohammad Reza Salamat","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is the feasibility of using radiomics features, bone morphometry features (BM), and Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained from routine chest computed tomography (CT) for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 120 patients who underwent routine chest CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations within a month. Whole thoracic vertebral bodies from routine chest CT images were segmented using the GrowCut semi-automatic segmentation method, and radiomics features, BM features, and HU values were extracted. To assess the intra- and inter-observer variability of segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was utilized. Feature selection was carried out using the intra-class correlation coefficient and the Boruta algorithm. Six machine learning classification models were employed for classification in a three-class manner. The models' performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC). Other evaluation parameters of the models were calculated, including overall accuracy, precision, and sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DSC values showed high similarity by achieving 0.907 ± 0.034 and 0.887 ± 0.048 for intra- and inter-observer segmentation agreement, respectively. After a two-stepwise feature selection, 21 radiomics features were selected. Different combinations of these radiomics features with five BM features and HU values were applied to six classification models for evaluating BMD. The multilayer perceptron (MLP) model based on integration of radiomics features and BM features in a three-class classification approach achieved higher performance compared to other models with an AUC of 0.981 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.937-0.997) in normal BMD class, an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.826-0.944) in osteopenia class, and an AUC of 0.927 (95% CI: 0.866-0.967) in osteoporosis class.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the MLP classification model based on a combination of radiomics features and BM features in a three-class classification approach can effectively distinguish different BMD conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: The purpose of this study is the feasibility of using radiomics features, bone morphometry features (BM), and Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained from routine chest computed tomography (CT) for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) status.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 120 patients who underwent routine chest CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations within a month. Whole thoracic vertebral bodies from routine chest CT images were segmented using the GrowCut semi-automatic segmentation method, and radiomics features, BM features, and HU values were extracted. To assess the intra- and inter-observer variability of segmentation, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was utilized. Feature selection was carried out using the intra-class correlation coefficient and the Boruta algorithm. Six machine learning classification models were employed for classification in a three-class manner. The models' performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC). Other evaluation parameters of the models were calculated, including overall accuracy, precision, and sensitivity.

Results: The DSC values showed high similarity by achieving 0.907 ± 0.034 and 0.887 ± 0.048 for intra- and inter-observer segmentation agreement, respectively. After a two-stepwise feature selection, 21 radiomics features were selected. Different combinations of these radiomics features with five BM features and HU values were applied to six classification models for evaluating BMD. The multilayer perceptron (MLP) model based on integration of radiomics features and BM features in a three-class classification approach achieved higher performance compared to other models with an AUC of 0.981 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.937-0.997) in normal BMD class, an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI: 0.826-0.944) in osteopenia class, and an AUC of 0.927 (95% CI: 0.866-0.967) in osteoporosis class.

Conclusion: Using the MLP classification model based on a combination of radiomics features and BM features in a three-class classification approach can effectively distinguish different BMD conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于放射组学、骨形态测量和常规胸部 CT 导出的 Hounsfield 单位的骨矿物质密度评估新方法。
理由和目标:本研究旨在探讨使用常规胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)获得的放射组学特征、骨形态测量特征(BM)和Hounsfield单位(HU)值评估骨矿物质密度(BMD)状况的可行性:这项回顾性研究分析了 120 名在一个月内接受常规胸部 CT 和双能 X 光吸收测量检查的患者。使用 GrowCut 半自动分割方法对常规胸部 CT 图像中的整个胸椎体进行分割,并提取放射组学特征、BM 特征和 HU 值。为了评估观察者内部和观察者之间分割的可变性,使用了 Dice 相似性系数 (DSC)。使用类内相关系数和 Boruta 算法进行特征选择。采用了六个机器学习分类模型进行三类分类。模型的性能使用接收者运算特性曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估。还计算了模型的其他评价参数,包括总体准确率、精确度和灵敏度:结果:DSC 值显示了很高的相似性,观察者内部和观察者之间的分割一致性分别达到了 0.907 ± 0.034 和 0.887 ± 0.048。经过两步特征选择,选出了 21 个放射组学特征。这些放射组学特征与五个BM特征和HU值的不同组合被应用到六个评估BMD的分类模型中。与其他模型相比,基于放射组学特征和BM特征整合的多层感知器(MLP)模型在三类分类方法中取得了更高的性能,在正常BMD类别中的AUC为0.981(95%置信区间(CI):0.937-0.997),在骨质疏松症类别中的AUC为0.896(95%置信区间(CI):0.826-0.944),在骨质疏松症类别中的AUC为0.927(95%置信区间(CI):0.866-0.967):结论:在三类分类方法中使用基于放射组学特征和 BM 特征组合的 MLP 分类模型能有效区分不同的 BMD 状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A Novel Approach Based on Integrating Radiomics, Bone Morphometry and Hounsfield Unit-Derived From Routine Chest CT for Bone Mineral Density Assessment. Authors' Response: FDG-PET/CT in Lung: Beyond Cancer. CT-Defined Coronary Artery Calcification as a Prognostic Marker for Overall Survival in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Accuracy and Readability of ChatGPT on Potential Complications of Interventional Radiology Procedures: AI-Powered Patient Interviewing. Automated Kidney Stone Composition Analysis with Photon-Counting Detector CT, a Performance Study-A Phantom Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1