Livie Yumeng Li, Anders Aasted Isaksen, Benjamin Lebiecka-Johansen, Kristian Funck, Vajira Thambawita, Stine Byberg, Tue Helms Andersen, Ole Norgaard, Adam Hulman
{"title":"Prediction of cardiovascular markers and diseases using retinal fundus images and deep learning: a systematic scoping review.","authors":"Livie Yumeng Li, Anders Aasted Isaksen, Benjamin Lebiecka-Johansen, Kristian Funck, Vajira Thambawita, Stine Byberg, Tue Helms Andersen, Ole Norgaard, Adam Hulman","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid development in deep learning for image analysis inspired studies to focus on predicting cardiovascular risk using retinal fundus images. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe studies using retinal fundus images and deep learning to predict cardiovascular risk markers and diseases. We searched MEDLINE and Embase on 17 November 2023. Abstracts and relevant full-text articles were independently screened by two reviewers. We included studies that used deep learning for the analysis of retinal fundus images to predict cardiovascular risk markers or cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and excluded studies only using predefined characteristics of retinal fundus images. Study characteristics were presented using descriptive statistics. We included 24 articles published between 2018 and 2023. Among these, 23 (96%) were cross-sectional studies and eight (33%) were follow-up studies with clinical CVD outcomes. Seven studies included a combination of both designs. Most studies (96%) used convolutional neural networks to process images. We found nine (38%) studies that incorporated clinical risk factors in the prediction and four (17%) that compared the results to commonly used clinical risk scores in a prospective setting. Three of these reported improved discriminative performance. External validation of models was rare (21%). There is increasing interest in using retinal fundus images in cardiovascular risk assessment with some studies demonstrating some improvements in prediction. However, more prospective studies, comparisons of results to clinical risk scores, and models augmented with traditional risk factors can strengthen further research in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"5 6","pages":"660-669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rapid development in deep learning for image analysis inspired studies to focus on predicting cardiovascular risk using retinal fundus images. This scoping review aimed to identify and describe studies using retinal fundus images and deep learning to predict cardiovascular risk markers and diseases. We searched MEDLINE and Embase on 17 November 2023. Abstracts and relevant full-text articles were independently screened by two reviewers. We included studies that used deep learning for the analysis of retinal fundus images to predict cardiovascular risk markers or cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and excluded studies only using predefined characteristics of retinal fundus images. Study characteristics were presented using descriptive statistics. We included 24 articles published between 2018 and 2023. Among these, 23 (96%) were cross-sectional studies and eight (33%) were follow-up studies with clinical CVD outcomes. Seven studies included a combination of both designs. Most studies (96%) used convolutional neural networks to process images. We found nine (38%) studies that incorporated clinical risk factors in the prediction and four (17%) that compared the results to commonly used clinical risk scores in a prospective setting. Three of these reported improved discriminative performance. External validation of models was rare (21%). There is increasing interest in using retinal fundus images in cardiovascular risk assessment with some studies demonstrating some improvements in prediction. However, more prospective studies, comparisons of results to clinical risk scores, and models augmented with traditional risk factors can strengthen further research in the field.