Quantifying the life cycle emissions of hybrid structures with advanced bio- and conventional materialization for low-embodied carbon urban densification of the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144273
Elizabeth Migoni Alejandre, Gilbert Koskamp, Mick van de Leur, Alexander Wandl, Arjan van Timmeren
{"title":"Quantifying the life cycle emissions of hybrid structures with advanced bio- and conventional materialization for low-embodied carbon urban densification of the Amsterdam Metropolitan Area","authors":"Elizabeth Migoni Alejandre, Gilbert Koskamp, Mick van de Leur, Alexander Wandl, Arjan van Timmeren","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than 20% of global carbon emissions are linked with the production of construction materials used in the built environment. The use of bio-materials along with urban densification strategies that avoid demolition and reduce material demand, have been recommended to achieve urban sustainability goals. Addressing these measures, this study compares the life cycle embodied carbon emissions of seven hybrid top-up structural systems composed of concrete, steel and advanced engineered timber products made out of softwood and hardwood species. The life cycle carbon emissions (expressed in kgCO<sub>2</sub>-eq) were estimated following a cradle-to-grave approach, with a functional unit equivalent to 1m<sup>2</sup> of top-up structural system and focusing on The Netherlands and the city of Amsterdam as main geographical scope. An statistical analysis was included to account for the potential variation of emissions across each life cycle stage, using Monte Carlo simulations for random sampling. The results indicate that predominantly bio-based structures present a staggering 60% lower embodied carbon emissions compared with predominantly concrete, steel and modestly hybrid systems. Preserving the long-term carbon storage capacity of timber elements through high-quality reuse can offset 30-60% of the total positive emissions of the predominantly bio-based systems. Up to 6MtCO<sub>2</sub>-eq of the national carbon budget in The Netherlands can be saved from a radical uptake of bio-based structures in Amsterdam by 2050. Diversification of material diets with bio-based alternatives is recommended, along with established policy that can guarantee sustainable sourcing and prolonged lifespans through high-end reuse practices.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144273","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than 20% of global carbon emissions are linked with the production of construction materials used in the built environment. The use of bio-materials along with urban densification strategies that avoid demolition and reduce material demand, have been recommended to achieve urban sustainability goals. Addressing these measures, this study compares the life cycle embodied carbon emissions of seven hybrid top-up structural systems composed of concrete, steel and advanced engineered timber products made out of softwood and hardwood species. The life cycle carbon emissions (expressed in kgCO2-eq) were estimated following a cradle-to-grave approach, with a functional unit equivalent to 1m2 of top-up structural system and focusing on The Netherlands and the city of Amsterdam as main geographical scope. An statistical analysis was included to account for the potential variation of emissions across each life cycle stage, using Monte Carlo simulations for random sampling. The results indicate that predominantly bio-based structures present a staggering 60% lower embodied carbon emissions compared with predominantly concrete, steel and modestly hybrid systems. Preserving the long-term carbon storage capacity of timber elements through high-quality reuse can offset 30-60% of the total positive emissions of the predominantly bio-based systems. Up to 6MtCO2-eq of the national carbon budget in The Netherlands can be saved from a radical uptake of bio-based structures in Amsterdam by 2050. Diversification of material diets with bio-based alternatives is recommended, along with established policy that can guarantee sustainable sourcing and prolonged lifespans through high-end reuse practices.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化采用先进生物材料和传统材料的混合结构的生命周期排放量,实现阿姆斯特丹大都市区的低碳城市密集化
全球碳排放量的 20% 以上与建筑环境中使用的建筑材料的生产有关。为实现城市可持续发展目标,人们建议使用生物材料以及避免拆除和减少材料需求的城市密集化战略。针对这些措施,本研究比较了由混凝土、钢材和软木及硬木制成的高级工程木材产品组成的七种混合上部结构系统的生命周期内含碳排放量。生命周期碳排放量(以 kgCO2-eq 表示)的估算采用了 "从摇篮到坟墓 "的方法,功能单位相当于 1 平方米的顶部结构系统,并以荷兰和阿姆斯特丹市为主要地理范围。采用蒙特卡洛随机抽样模拟法进行了统计分析,以考虑每个生命周期阶段排放的潜在变化。结果表明,与主要采用混凝土、钢材和适度混合的系统相比,主要采用生物材料的结构的内含碳排放量要低 60%。通过高质量的再利用来保持木材构件的长期碳储存能力,可以抵消主要生物基系统总正排放量的 30-60%。到 2050 年,在阿姆斯特丹大力采用生物基结构,可节省高达 600 万吨二氧化碳当量的荷兰国家碳预算。建议使用生物基替代品实现材料饮食的多样化,同时制定政策,确保可持续采购,并通过高端再利用实践延长使用寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Environmental impact analysis of potassium-ion batteries based on the life cycle assessment: a comparison with lithium iron phosphate batteries Substitution of Sewage Sludge Ash for Sand in Concrete containing Sintered Coarse Aggregate: A Lightweight Concrete with Fully Solid Waste Aggregate Research on negative carbon potential and mechanisms in the productive renewal of Roof gardens Towards Resource Regeneration: A Focus on Copper Recovery from Electronic Waste Thermochemical treatment of fly ash and desulfurization wastewater from municipal sewage sludge incineration plant for phosphorus recycling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1