'Made in the Galleries of His Most Serene Highness, Florence'. Conflicts in instrument invention at the Medici court: the pendulum clock, and the Accademia del Cimento.

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Annals of Science Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1080/00033790.2024.2426814
Cristiano Zanetti
{"title":"<i>'Made in the Galleries of His Most Serene Highness, Florence'</i>. Conflicts in instrument invention at the Medici court: the pendulum clock, and the Accademia del Cimento.","authors":"Cristiano Zanetti","doi":"10.1080/00033790.2024.2426814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay proposes that the only publication of the Accademia del Cimento, referred to as <i>Saggi</i>,<sup>1</sup>1 Accademia del Cimento, <i>Saggi di naturali esperienze fatte nell' Accademia del Cimento sotto la protezione del serenissimo principe Leopoldo di Toscana e descritte dal segretario di essa Accademia</i> (Firenze: Per Giuseppe Cocchini, 1667). had as one of its main goals the celebration of the House of Medici's paternity of cutting-edge experiments and instruments during the reign of Grand Duke Ferdinando II. These included Ferdinando II's thermometers and hygrometers, Torricelli's experiment and barometer, and Galileo's pendulum as a clock-regulator. It seems that this agenda went unnoticed, not at the time of its initial circulation, but rather in modern historiography. Christiaan Huygens's challenged invention of the pendulum clock provides a case study to explore the agenda of this publication and the problem of defining an invention in seventeenth-century Europe. This paper presents for the first time the document that attests to when the first specimen of Huygens's clock arrived in Florence, disproving the previously believed date of September 1657. The paper argues that over the last two centuries, this error has made the Medici narratives of this dispute appear inconsistent and marginalized them. In light of this new find, they must be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":8086,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2024.2426814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay proposes that the only publication of the Accademia del Cimento, referred to as Saggi,11 Accademia del Cimento, Saggi di naturali esperienze fatte nell' Accademia del Cimento sotto la protezione del serenissimo principe Leopoldo di Toscana e descritte dal segretario di essa Accademia (Firenze: Per Giuseppe Cocchini, 1667). had as one of its main goals the celebration of the House of Medici's paternity of cutting-edge experiments and instruments during the reign of Grand Duke Ferdinando II. These included Ferdinando II's thermometers and hygrometers, Torricelli's experiment and barometer, and Galileo's pendulum as a clock-regulator. It seems that this agenda went unnoticed, not at the time of its initial circulation, but rather in modern historiography. Christiaan Huygens's challenged invention of the pendulum clock provides a case study to explore the agenda of this publication and the problem of defining an invention in seventeenth-century Europe. This paper presents for the first time the document that attests to when the first specimen of Huygens's clock arrived in Florence, disproving the previously believed date of September 1657. The paper argues that over the last two centuries, this error has made the Medici narratives of this dispute appear inconsistent and marginalized them. In light of this new find, they must be reconsidered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佛罗伦萨至尊殿下画廊制造"。美第奇宫廷乐器发明的冲突:摆钟和手工艺学院。
本文认为,手工艺学院唯一的出版物,即《Saggi》11 ,是手工艺学院在托斯卡纳主教莱奥波尔多(Leopoldo di Toscana)的保护下,由学院院长撰写的自然科学论文(佛罗伦萨:Per Giuseppe Cocchini,1667 年)。该书的主要目的之一是纪念美第奇家族在费尔迪南多二世大公统治时期对尖端实验和仪器的贡献。其中包括费尔迪南多二世的温度计和湿度计、托里切利的实验和气压计,以及伽利略作为时钟调节器的钟摆。这个议程似乎并没有被注意到,不是在其最初流传的时候,而是在现代历史学中。克里斯蒂安-惠更斯受到质疑的摆钟发明提供了一个案例研究,以探讨该出版物的议程以及在十七世纪的欧洲界定一项发明的问题。本文首次提出了一份文件,证明惠更斯钟表的第一个样品何时抵达佛罗伦萨,推翻了之前认为的1657年9月这一日期。论文认为,在过去的两个世纪中,这一错误使得美第奇家族对这一争议的叙述显得前后矛盾,并使其边缘化。鉴于这一新发现,必须重新考虑这些说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Science
Annals of Science 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Science , launched in 1936, publishes work on the history of science, technology and medicine, covering developments from classical antiquity to the late 20th century. The Journal has a global reach, both in terms of the work that it publishes, and also in terms of its readership. The editors particularly welcome submissions from authors in Asia, Africa and South America. Each issue contains research articles, and a comprehensive book reviews section, including essay reviews on a group of books on a broader level. Articles are published in both English and French, and the Journal welcomes proposals for special issues on relevant topics. The Editors and Publisher are committed to supporting early career researchers, and award an annual prize to the best submission from current doctoral students, or those awarded a doctorate in the past four years.
期刊最新文献
'Made in the Galleries of His Most Serene Highness, Florence'. Conflicts in instrument invention at the Medici court: the pendulum clock, and the Accademia del Cimento. On Simon Mayr's alleged discovery of Jupiter's satellites. Inventing the language of Things: the emergence of scientific reporting in seventeenth-century England. Correction. The social agency of instruments of surveying and exploration c.1830-1930.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1