{"title":"Cardiorespiratory, hemodynamic, and sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in sheep.","authors":"Janainne Hilbig Gomes, Isabela Plazza Bittar, Rauane Sousa de Moura, Bruna Ginú Prado, Leandro Guimarães Franco","doi":"10.1177/00236772241277891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An alternative in an attempt to minimize the effects triggered by intravenous (IV) bolus administration of α-2 adrenergic receptor agonists are continuous rate infusions (CRI). The requirement for sedation protocols in sheep for procedures to be performed without physical restraint and with reduced adverse effects, commonly observed with bolus use, justifies the study of CRI. The aim of study was to compare the cardiopulmonary and sedative effects of IV bolus injection and CRI of dexmedetomidine (DEX) in sheep. Six adult male sheep (38.3 ± 7.6 kg) received DEX as a bolus (5 µg kg<sup>-1</sup>, DEX<sub>bolus</sub> treatment) or CRI (5 µg kg<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup> for 1 h, DEX<sub>CRI</sub> treatment). We recorded heartrate (HR), respiratory rate, systemic arterial blood pressure, pulse oximetry, hemodynamic parameters, blood gases and sedation scores over 120 min. HR was significantly lower in DEX<sub>bolus</sub> at 5 and 15 min than in DEX<sub>CRI</sub>, with HR reduction observed for 30 min in DEX<sub>bolus</sub>. Hypoxemia was noted in DEX<sub>bolus</sub> at 10 and 30 min. Pulmonary vascular resistance index increased at 5 min, and cardiac index (CI) decreased at all timepoints compared with baseline in DEX<sub>bolus</sub>. In DEX<sub>CRI</sub>, CI decreased only at 45 min. Sedation scores were higher in DEX<sub>bolus</sub> at 15 and 30 min. DEX CRI administration resulted in fewer cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic changes compared with bolus injection and lower sedation scores (<4/10), which would not allow animal handling without a reaction. The load dose used in CRI was a limitation to constant infusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"236772241277891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241277891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An alternative in an attempt to minimize the effects triggered by intravenous (IV) bolus administration of α-2 adrenergic receptor agonists are continuous rate infusions (CRI). The requirement for sedation protocols in sheep for procedures to be performed without physical restraint and with reduced adverse effects, commonly observed with bolus use, justifies the study of CRI. The aim of study was to compare the cardiopulmonary and sedative effects of IV bolus injection and CRI of dexmedetomidine (DEX) in sheep. Six adult male sheep (38.3 ± 7.6 kg) received DEX as a bolus (5 µg kg-1, DEXbolus treatment) or CRI (5 µg kg-1 h-1 for 1 h, DEXCRI treatment). We recorded heartrate (HR), respiratory rate, systemic arterial blood pressure, pulse oximetry, hemodynamic parameters, blood gases and sedation scores over 120 min. HR was significantly lower in DEXbolus at 5 and 15 min than in DEXCRI, with HR reduction observed for 30 min in DEXbolus. Hypoxemia was noted in DEXbolus at 10 and 30 min. Pulmonary vascular resistance index increased at 5 min, and cardiac index (CI) decreased at all timepoints compared with baseline in DEXbolus. In DEXCRI, CI decreased only at 45 min. Sedation scores were higher in DEXbolus at 15 and 30 min. DEX CRI administration resulted in fewer cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic changes compared with bolus injection and lower sedation scores (<4/10), which would not allow animal handling without a reaction. The load dose used in CRI was a limitation to constant infusion.
期刊介绍:
The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.