Perceptions, facilitators, and barriers of participation for a behavioral weight loss group-based telehealth program for breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-08999-x
Yangzi Liu, Elizabeth De Jesus, Macy Goldbach, Robert S Krouse, Carmen E Guerra, Katharine A Rendle, Tamara J Cadet, Kelly C Allison, Julia Tchou
{"title":"Perceptions, facilitators, and barriers of participation for a behavioral weight loss group-based telehealth program for breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.","authors":"Yangzi Liu, Elizabeth De Jesus, Macy Goldbach, Robert S Krouse, Carmen E Guerra, Katharine A Rendle, Tamara J Cadet, Kelly C Allison, Julia Tchou","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08999-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Results from the pilot Group-basEd Telehealth behavioral Weight Loss (GET-WEL) Program (NCT04855552) showed that fewer Black breast cancer survivors (BCS) enrolled than White BCS. Black participants also lost less weight than White participants. Little is known about mitigating factors or how best to implement such programs equitably. In this study, we explored facilitators and barriers in Black and White BCS who did or did not participate in GET-WEL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BCS who are overweight or obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and who had previously been assessed for their willingness to participate in GET-WEL were invited to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview conducted from June to August 2023. Interviewees were purposefully sampled from those who did (participants) and did not (non-participants) enroll in GET-WEL. Interviews were coded and analyzed via comparative thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 24 interviewees, 9 (8 White, 1 Black) were GET-WEL participants, and 15 (8 White, 6 Black, 1 Asian) were non-participants. There were no thematic differences between Black and White BCS. Most non-participants lacked awareness that the Program was recruiting. Program accountability, session flexibility, and pre-existing exercise routines emerged as facilitators while inability to identify enjoyable physical activities, difficulty accessing healthy foods, and competing work/life priorities emerged as barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that enhancing Program awareness and outreach may increase enrollment in minoritized BCS. Resources providing healthy foods and support to ease competing work/life priorities may help BCS maintain healthy lifestyles during and after GET-WEL. These results may help inform future large-scale GET-WEL implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"808"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08999-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Results from the pilot Group-basEd Telehealth behavioral Weight Loss (GET-WEL) Program (NCT04855552) showed that fewer Black breast cancer survivors (BCS) enrolled than White BCS. Black participants also lost less weight than White participants. Little is known about mitigating factors or how best to implement such programs equitably. In this study, we explored facilitators and barriers in Black and White BCS who did or did not participate in GET-WEL.

Methods: BCS who are overweight or obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2) and who had previously been assessed for their willingness to participate in GET-WEL were invited to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview conducted from June to August 2023. Interviewees were purposefully sampled from those who did (participants) and did not (non-participants) enroll in GET-WEL. Interviews were coded and analyzed via comparative thematic analysis.

Results: Of the 24 interviewees, 9 (8 White, 1 Black) were GET-WEL participants, and 15 (8 White, 6 Black, 1 Asian) were non-participants. There were no thematic differences between Black and White BCS. Most non-participants lacked awareness that the Program was recruiting. Program accountability, session flexibility, and pre-existing exercise routines emerged as facilitators while inability to identify enjoyable physical activities, difficulty accessing healthy foods, and competing work/life priorities emerged as barriers.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that enhancing Program awareness and outreach may increase enrollment in minoritized BCS. Resources providing healthy foods and support to ease competing work/life priorities may help BCS maintain healthy lifestyles during and after GET-WEL. These results may help inform future large-scale GET-WEL implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌幸存者参与基于行为减肥小组的远程保健计划的看法、促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
目的Group-basEd Telehealth 行为减肥 (GET-WEL) 试点项目(NCT04855552)的结果显示,黑人乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)的注册人数少于白人乳腺癌幸存者。黑人参与者的体重减轻率也低于白人参与者。人们对减轻体重的因素或如何最好地公平实施此类计划知之甚少。在本研究中,我们探讨了参加或未参加 GET-WEL 的黑人和白人 BCS 的促进因素和障碍:我们邀请了超重或肥胖(体重指数 (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2)的 BCS 参与 2023 年 6 月至 8 月进行的半结构化电话访谈,这些 BCS 之前曾接受过评估,了解他们是否愿意参与 GET-WEL。受访者是从参加 GET-WEL 的受访者(参加者)和未参加 GET-WEL 的受访者(非参加者)中有目的地抽取的。通过比较主题分析法对访谈进行编码和分析:在 24 位受访者中,9 位(8 位白人,1 位黑人)是 GET-WEL 的参与者,15 位(8 位白人,6 位黑人,1 位亚裔)是非参与者。黑人和白人 BCS 没有主题差异。大多数非参与者不知道该计划正在招募。该计划的问责制、课程的灵活性和已有的锻炼习惯成为促进因素,而无法确定令人愉悦的体育活动、难以获得健康食品以及工作/生活优先事项相互竞争则成为障碍:我们的研究结果表明,加强对计划的认识和推广可能会提高少数族裔 BCS 的注册率。提供健康食品和支持以缓解工作/生活中相互竞争的优先事项的资源可帮助 BCS 在 GET-WEL 期间和之后保持健康的生活方式。这些结果可能有助于为未来大规模实施 GET-WEL 提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
KRAS-G12 inhibitors in lung cancer therapy: unveiling the toxicity profile through a pharmacovigilance study. Streptococcus pneumoniae and influenza vaccination rates in oncological patients - data from Germany. Evaluating pain management practices for cancer patients among health professionals in cancer and supportive/palliative care units: a Belgian survey. Incidence and impact of food aversions among patients with cancer receiving outpatient chemotherapy: a one-year prospective survey. Perceptions, facilitators, and barriers of participation for a behavioral weight loss group-based telehealth program for breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1