The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2429751
Jasemin Todri, Orges Lena
{"title":"The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.","authors":"Jasemin Todri, Orges Lena","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2429751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the translation, validation, and reliability of the Albanian ODI (ODI-A) version 2.1b.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standardized guidelines for evaluation of psychometric properties were followed. Participants were recruited from a national center with orthopedic-traumatological specialty of an Albanian region. The construct validity, internal consistency, and the reliability of ODI-A measured by seven days test-retest method across two repeated measures were considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 200 patients completed the ODI-A 2.1b version: 43% had low back pain, 36% had rheumatoid arthritis as principal diagnosis and the other participants had trauma, luxation, discal hernia, and fractures as diagnosis accompanied by back pain. There were no missing items. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.613 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was found to be significant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). ODI-A showed excellent test-retest reliability of each item (ICC = 0.707-0.959). Cronbach's <i>α</i> for the first completion was 0.684, ICC for ODI-A was 0.629, the SEM was 1.701, and MDC<sub>95%</sub> was 4.71.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ODI-A, adapted from a linguistic and cultural perspective, meets validity and reliability requirements necessary for its use in the Albanian population with back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"3714-3720"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2429751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the translation, validation, and reliability of the Albanian ODI (ODI-A) version 2.1b.

Methods: Standardized guidelines for evaluation of psychometric properties were followed. Participants were recruited from a national center with orthopedic-traumatological specialty of an Albanian region. The construct validity, internal consistency, and the reliability of ODI-A measured by seven days test-retest method across two repeated measures were considered.

Results: In total, 200 patients completed the ODI-A 2.1b version: 43% had low back pain, 36% had rheumatoid arthritis as principal diagnosis and the other participants had trauma, luxation, discal hernia, and fractures as diagnosis accompanied by back pain. There were no missing items. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin was 0.613 and Bartlett's test of sphericity was found to be significant (p < 0.001). ODI-A showed excellent test-retest reliability of each item (ICC = 0.707-0.959). Cronbach's α for the first completion was 0.684, ICC for ODI-A was 0.629, the SEM was 1.701, and MDC95% was 4.71.

Conclusions: ODI-A, adapted from a linguistic and cultural perspective, meets validity and reliability requirements necessary for its use in the Albanian population with back pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔巴尼亚语版的奥斯韦特里残疾指数:翻译、跨文化适应性、有效性和可靠性。
目的:本研究旨在评估阿尔巴尼亚语 ODI(ODI-A)2.1b 版本的翻译、验证和可靠性:方法:采用标准化指南评估心理测量特性。受试者来自阿尔巴尼亚地区的一家国家骨科-创伤专科中心。在两次重复测量中,采用七天重测法测量 ODI-A 的结构效度、内部一致性和可靠性:共有 200 名患者完成了 ODI-A 2.1b 版本:43%的患者有腰背痛,36%的患者主要诊断为类风湿性关节炎,其他患者诊断为外伤、关节松弛、椎间盘疝和骨折,并伴有腰背痛。没有遗漏项目。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin值为0.613,Bartlett球形度检验显著(第一次完成的p α为0.684,ODI-A的ICC为0.629,SEM为1.701,MDC95%为4.71):从语言和文化角度改编的 ODI-A 符合在阿尔巴尼亚背痛患者中使用所需的有效性和可靠性要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
Developing policy-informed principles for rehabilitation using a model of care framework: a hand therapy example in a Global South context. External validation of four models predicting treatment success after interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment. Back to work: exploring barriers and facilitators to return to work and work participation following traumatic amputation. Identifying priorities for a national motor neurone disease (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) guideline: results from an Australian online survey. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) scale for patients with multiple sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1