New York City 2100: Environmental justice implications of future scenarios for addressing extreme heat

IF 7.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105249
Maya Dutta , Pablo Herreros-Cantis , Timon McPhearson , Ahmed Mustafa , Matthew I. Palmer , Mika Tosca , Jennifer Ventrella , Elizabeth M. Cook
{"title":"New York City 2100: Environmental justice implications of future scenarios for addressing extreme heat","authors":"Maya Dutta ,&nbsp;Pablo Herreros-Cantis ,&nbsp;Timon McPhearson ,&nbsp;Ahmed Mustafa ,&nbsp;Matthew I. Palmer ,&nbsp;Mika Tosca ,&nbsp;Jennifer Ventrella ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Cook","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate-driven hazards, such as extreme heat or precipitation, are threatening the current and future livability of New York City (NYC) and disproportionately affecting low-income communities and communities of color. To envision future climate resilience, government stakeholders and researchers co-produced future scenarios for 2100 in response to climate hazards for NYC during participatory workshops in Fall 2021. A commonly co-produced strategy included urban green infrastructure (UGI) because of its potential to retain runoff and provide cooling benefits. We ask, what are the potential environmental justice implications of ecosystem services provisioned from UGI distribution in the co-produced NYC future scenario compared to a business-as-usual future scenario? To analyze potential outcomes and tradeoffs, we integrated spatially-explicit UGI strategies into simulated land use and cover models. We then assessed two ecosystem services (flood and heat mitigation) using the spatially-explicit tool Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST). We explored potential environmental justice implications by comparing the provision of ecosystem services to sociodemographic indicators within census block groups between scenarios. Presently, ecosystem services are disproportionately lower for communities of color, including predominantly Asian, Black/African-American, and Hispanic/Latino communities. In future scenarios we found ecosystem service provision will decrease within these communities under business-as-usual land development. The future scenario co-produced for extreme heat resilience, however, shows an increase in overall provisioning across NYC, including in neighborhoods with a high proportion of people of color. Our results show that co-produced future scenarios can be used to inform strategic future planning for inclusive adaptation decisions to improve future climate resilience and justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 105249"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204624002482","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate-driven hazards, such as extreme heat or precipitation, are threatening the current and future livability of New York City (NYC) and disproportionately affecting low-income communities and communities of color. To envision future climate resilience, government stakeholders and researchers co-produced future scenarios for 2100 in response to climate hazards for NYC during participatory workshops in Fall 2021. A commonly co-produced strategy included urban green infrastructure (UGI) because of its potential to retain runoff and provide cooling benefits. We ask, what are the potential environmental justice implications of ecosystem services provisioned from UGI distribution in the co-produced NYC future scenario compared to a business-as-usual future scenario? To analyze potential outcomes and tradeoffs, we integrated spatially-explicit UGI strategies into simulated land use and cover models. We then assessed two ecosystem services (flood and heat mitigation) using the spatially-explicit tool Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST). We explored potential environmental justice implications by comparing the provision of ecosystem services to sociodemographic indicators within census block groups between scenarios. Presently, ecosystem services are disproportionately lower for communities of color, including predominantly Asian, Black/African-American, and Hispanic/Latino communities. In future scenarios we found ecosystem service provision will decrease within these communities under business-as-usual land development. The future scenario co-produced for extreme heat resilience, however, shows an increase in overall provisioning across NYC, including in neighborhoods with a high proportion of people of color. Our results show that co-produced future scenarios can be used to inform strategic future planning for inclusive adaptation decisions to improve future climate resilience and justice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2100 年的纽约市:应对极端高温的未来方案对环境正义的影响
极端高温或降水等气候灾害正威胁着纽约市(NYC)当前和未来的宜居性,对低收入社区和有色人种社区的影响尤为严重。为了展望未来的气候适应能力,政府利益相关者和研究人员在 2021 年秋季的参与式研讨会上共同制定了 2100 年纽约市应对气候灾害的未来方案。共同制定的一项战略包括城市绿色基础设施(UGI),因为它具有截留径流和提供降温效益的潜力。我们要问的是,与 "一切照旧 "的未来情景相比,在共同制定的纽约市未来情景中,城市绿色基础设施分布所提供的生态系统服务对环境正义有哪些潜在影响?为了分析潜在的结果和权衡,我们将空间明确的 UGI 策略整合到模拟的土地利用和覆盖模型中。然后,我们使用空间显式工具生态系统服务和权衡综合估值 (InVEST) 评估了两种生态系统服务(洪水和热量缓解)。我们通过比较不同情景下人口普查区块组内生态系统服务的提供与社会人口指标,探讨了潜在的环境正义影响。目前,有色人种社区(主要包括亚裔、黑人/非裔美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区)的生态系统服务不成比例地较低。在未来情景中,我们发现在 "一切照旧 "的土地开发情况下,这些社区的生态系统服务供应将减少。然而,为抵御极端高温而共同设计的未来情景显示,整个纽约市(包括有色人种比例较高的社区)的总体供应量将增加。我们的研究结果表明,共同制作的未来情景可用于为包容性适应决策的未来战略规划提供信息,以改善未来的气候适应能力和公正性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
期刊最新文献
Who values urban open spaces? investigating heterogeneity in the capitalization of open space in New York city Editorial Board The planning of urban–rural linkages: An automated content analysis of spatial plans adopted by European intermediate cities Not or Yes in My Back Yard? A physiological and psychological measurement of urban residents in Taiwan Homelessness and nature across landscapes and disciplines: A literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1