Driving characteristics of static obstacle avoidance by drivers in mountain highway tunnels − A lateral safety distance judgement

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107845
Ying Chen , Zhigang Du , Jin Xu , Shuang Luo
{"title":"Driving characteristics of static obstacle avoidance by drivers in mountain highway tunnels − A lateral safety distance judgement","authors":"Ying Chen ,&nbsp;Zhigang Du ,&nbsp;Jin Xu ,&nbsp;Shuang Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Static obstacles (tunnel sidewalls, barricades, etc.) on the side of mountainous highways change the spatial range of the road during driving, restricting the driver’s freedom of driving while possibly triggering the driver’s shy away effect, which poses a specific potential safety hazard. To understand the characteristics of driving behaviour in mountain highway tunnels with different tunnel lengths and lateral obstacles, nine tunnels in Chongqing were selected for real-vehicle tests, and data on driving trajectories, speeds and other metrics were collected from 40 drivers. Analyse the driver’s need for lateral safety distance in different scenarios, defines the conditions and scope of the shy away effect, and establishes a multi-scenario “distance-trajectory” offset prediction model to adjust the offset under varying lateral environments by setting different facilities. The results show that drivers exhibit some avoidance behavior towards lateral static obstacles, but the extent of the shy-away effect varies based on tunnel length. By widening the lateral clearance to 0.925 m on the left side and 1.450 m on the right side of the road to meet the driver’s requirements for lateral safety distances, unreasonable avoidance behaviour can be reduced. Combined with the trajectory fluctuation characteristics of drivers in different tunnels, it is proposed to set up the traffic safety facilities in a manner more aligned with driver behavioral habits, with a place set up 110 m before the entrance of the short tunnel, two places set up in the medium tunnel at <em>L</em>/2 − 200 m, <em>L</em>/2 + 100 m (where <em>L</em> is the length of the tunnel), and three places for long tunnels at <em>L</em>/2 − 400 m, <em>L</em>/2 m, and <em>L</em>/2 + 300 m. For extra-long tunnels, facilities are to be set up in cycles of 500 m, 1000 m, and 1500 m intervals. In the cross-section where different drivers are prone to apparent trajectory offsets, a driving behavior prompt sign is added to help correct the driving trajectory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 107845"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524003907","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Static obstacles (tunnel sidewalls, barricades, etc.) on the side of mountainous highways change the spatial range of the road during driving, restricting the driver’s freedom of driving while possibly triggering the driver’s shy away effect, which poses a specific potential safety hazard. To understand the characteristics of driving behaviour in mountain highway tunnels with different tunnel lengths and lateral obstacles, nine tunnels in Chongqing were selected for real-vehicle tests, and data on driving trajectories, speeds and other metrics were collected from 40 drivers. Analyse the driver’s need for lateral safety distance in different scenarios, defines the conditions and scope of the shy away effect, and establishes a multi-scenario “distance-trajectory” offset prediction model to adjust the offset under varying lateral environments by setting different facilities. The results show that drivers exhibit some avoidance behavior towards lateral static obstacles, but the extent of the shy-away effect varies based on tunnel length. By widening the lateral clearance to 0.925 m on the left side and 1.450 m on the right side of the road to meet the driver’s requirements for lateral safety distances, unreasonable avoidance behaviour can be reduced. Combined with the trajectory fluctuation characteristics of drivers in different tunnels, it is proposed to set up the traffic safety facilities in a manner more aligned with driver behavioral habits, with a place set up 110 m before the entrance of the short tunnel, two places set up in the medium tunnel at L/2 − 200 m, L/2 + 100 m (where L is the length of the tunnel), and three places for long tunnels at L/2 − 400 m, L/2 m, and L/2 + 300 m. For extra-long tunnels, facilities are to be set up in cycles of 500 m, 1000 m, and 1500 m intervals. In the cross-section where different drivers are prone to apparent trajectory offsets, a driving behavior prompt sign is added to help correct the driving trajectory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
山区公路隧道中驾驶员静态避障的驾驶特性--横向安全距离判断。
山区公路边的静态障碍物(隧道侧壁、路障等)改变了行车过程中的道路空间范围,限制了驾驶员的驾驶自由,同时可能引发驾驶员的退避效应,存在特定的安全隐患。为了解不同隧道长度和横向障碍物的山区公路隧道驾驶行为特征,我们在重庆选取了9个隧道进行实车测试,并收集了40名驾驶员的驾驶轨迹、速度等指标数据。分析不同场景下驾驶员对横向安全距离的需求,明确避让效应产生的条件和范围,建立多场景 "距离-轨迹 "偏移预测模型,通过设置不同设施调整不同横向环境下的偏移量。结果表明,驾驶员对横向静态障碍物表现出一定的回避行为,但回避效应的程度因隧道长度而异。为满足驾驶员对横向安全距离的要求,可将道路左侧的横向间隙加宽至 0.925 米,右侧加宽至 1.450 米,从而减少不合理的避让行为。结合不同隧道内驾驶员的轨迹波动特点,建议以更符合驾驶员行为习惯的方式设置交通安全设施,短隧道在入口前110米处设置一处,中隧道在L/2-200米、L/2+100米处(其中L为隧道长度)设置两处,长隧道在L/2-400米、L/2米、L/2+300米处设置三处。对于超长隧道,设施将以 500 米、1000 米和 1500 米的间隔循环设置。在不同驾驶员容易出现明显轨迹偏移的断面,增加驾驶行为提示标志,帮助纠正驾驶轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
Driving against the clock: Investigating the impacts of time pressure on taxi and non-professional drivers’ safety and compliance Spatiotemporal analysis of roadway terrains impact on large truck driver injury severity outcomes using random parameters with heterogeneity in means and variances approach Evaluating the safety impact of mid-block pedestrian signals (MPS) Editorial Board An emergency operation strategy and motion planning method for autonomous vehicle in emergency scenarios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1