Ferdinand Meneau, Pascal Lapébie, Enrico Maria Daldello, Tran Le, Sandra Chevalier, Sarah Assaf, Evelyn Houliston, Catherine Jessus, Marika Miot
{"title":"ARPP19 phosphorylation site evolution and the switch in cAMP control of oocyte maturation in vertebrates.","authors":"Ferdinand Meneau, Pascal Lapébie, Enrico Maria Daldello, Tran Le, Sandra Chevalier, Sarah Assaf, Evelyn Houliston, Catherine Jessus, Marika Miot","doi":"10.1242/dev.202655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>cAMP-PKA signaling initiates the critical process of oocyte meiotic maturation in many animals, but inhibits it in vertebrates. To address this \"cAMP paradox\", we exchanged the key PKA substrate, ARPP19, between representative species, the vertebrate Xenopus and the cnidarian Clytia, comparing its phosphorylation and function. We found that as in Xenopus, Clytia maturing oocytes undergo ARPP19 phosphorylation on a highly conserved Gwl site, which inhibits PP2A and promotes M-phase entry. In contrast, despite a PKA phosphorylation signature motif recognisable across most animals, Clytia ARPP19 was only poorly phosphorylated by PKA in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, unlike Xenopus ARPP19, exogenous Clytia ARPP19 did not delay Xenopus oocyte maturation. We conclude that in Clytia ARPP19 does not intervene in oocyte maturation initiation because of both poor recognition by PKA and the absence of effectors that mediate vertebrate oocyte prophase arrest. We propose that ancestral ARPP19 phosphorylated by Gwl has retained a key role in M-phase across eukaryotes and it has acquired new functions during animal evolution mediated by enhanced PKA phosphorylation, allowing co-option into oocyte maturation regulation in the vertebrate lineage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11375,"journal":{"name":"Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.202655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
cAMP-PKA signaling initiates the critical process of oocyte meiotic maturation in many animals, but inhibits it in vertebrates. To address this "cAMP paradox", we exchanged the key PKA substrate, ARPP19, between representative species, the vertebrate Xenopus and the cnidarian Clytia, comparing its phosphorylation and function. We found that as in Xenopus, Clytia maturing oocytes undergo ARPP19 phosphorylation on a highly conserved Gwl site, which inhibits PP2A and promotes M-phase entry. In contrast, despite a PKA phosphorylation signature motif recognisable across most animals, Clytia ARPP19 was only poorly phosphorylated by PKA in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, unlike Xenopus ARPP19, exogenous Clytia ARPP19 did not delay Xenopus oocyte maturation. We conclude that in Clytia ARPP19 does not intervene in oocyte maturation initiation because of both poor recognition by PKA and the absence of effectors that mediate vertebrate oocyte prophase arrest. We propose that ancestral ARPP19 phosphorylated by Gwl has retained a key role in M-phase across eukaryotes and it has acquired new functions during animal evolution mediated by enhanced PKA phosphorylation, allowing co-option into oocyte maturation regulation in the vertebrate lineage.
期刊介绍:
Development’s scope covers all aspects of plant and animal development, including stem cell biology and regeneration. The single most important criterion for acceptance in Development is scientific excellence. Research papers (articles and reports) should therefore pose and test a significant hypothesis or address a significant question, and should provide novel perspectives that advance our understanding of development. We also encourage submission of papers that use computational methods or mathematical models to obtain significant new insights into developmental biology topics. Manuscripts that are descriptive in nature will be considered only when they lay important groundwork for a field and/or provide novel resources for understanding developmental processes of broad interest to the community.
Development includes a Techniques and Resources section for the publication of new methods, datasets, and other types of resources. Papers describing new techniques should include a proof-of-principle demonstration that the technique is valuable to the developmental biology community; they need not include in-depth follow-up analysis. The technique must be described in sufficient detail to be easily replicated by other investigators. Development will also consider protocol-type papers of exceptional interest to the community. We welcome submission of Resource papers, for example those reporting new databases, systems-level datasets, or genetic resources of major value to the developmental biology community. For all papers, the data or resource described must be made available to the community with minimal restrictions upon publication.
To aid navigability, Development has dedicated sections of the journal to stem cells & regeneration and to human development. The criteria for acceptance into these sections is identical to those outlined above. Authors and editors are encouraged to nominate appropriate manuscripts for inclusion in one of these sections.