Comparison of intermediate-range order in GeO2 glass: Molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential vs reverse Monte Carlo fitting to experimental data.
{"title":"Comparison of intermediate-range order in GeO2 glass: Molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential vs reverse Monte Carlo fitting to experimental data.","authors":"Kenta Matsutani, Shusuke Kasamatsu, Takeshi Usuki","doi":"10.1063/5.0240087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The short-range order and intermediate-range order in GeO2 glass are investigated by molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential trained on ab initio calculation data and compared with the reverse Monte Carlo fitting of neutron diffraction data. To characterize the structural differences in each model, the total/partial structure factors, coordination number, ring size and shape distributions, and persistent homology analysis were performed. These results show that although the two approaches yield similar two-body correlations, they can lead to three-dimensional models with different short- and intermediate-range ordering. A clear difference was observed especially in the ring distributions; RMC models exhibit a broad distribution in the ring size distribution, while neural network potential molecular dynamics yield much narrower ring distributions. This confirms that the density functional approximation in the ab initio calculations determines the preferred network assembly more strictly than RMC with simple coordination constraints even when using multiple diffraction data.</p>","PeriodicalId":15313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Physics","volume":"161 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0240087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The short-range order and intermediate-range order in GeO2 glass are investigated by molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential trained on ab initio calculation data and compared with the reverse Monte Carlo fitting of neutron diffraction data. To characterize the structural differences in each model, the total/partial structure factors, coordination number, ring size and shape distributions, and persistent homology analysis were performed. These results show that although the two approaches yield similar two-body correlations, they can lead to three-dimensional models with different short- and intermediate-range ordering. A clear difference was observed especially in the ring distributions; RMC models exhibit a broad distribution in the ring size distribution, while neural network potential molecular dynamics yield much narrower ring distributions. This confirms that the density functional approximation in the ab initio calculations determines the preferred network assembly more strictly than RMC with simple coordination constraints even when using multiple diffraction data.
利用基于 ab initio 计算数据训练的机器学习原子间势,通过分子动力学研究了 GeO2 玻璃中的短程阶和中程阶,并与中子衍射数据的反向蒙特卡罗拟合进行了比较。为了描述每个模型的结构差异,还进行了总/部分结构因子、配位数、环尺寸和形状分布以及持久同源性分析。这些结果表明,尽管这两种方法产生了相似的二体相关性,但它们可以导致具有不同短程和中程排序的三维模型。特别是在环分布方面,观察到了明显的差异;RMC 模型的环尺寸分布很宽,而神经网络势能分子动力学模型的环分布则窄得多。这证明,即使在使用多种衍射数据的情况下,ab initio 计算中的密度泛函近似也能比使用简单配位约束的 RMC 更严格地确定首选的网络组装。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Physics publishes quantitative and rigorous science of long-lasting value in methods and applications of chemical physics. The Journal also publishes brief Communications of significant new findings, Perspectives on the latest advances in the field, and Special Topic issues. The Journal focuses on innovative research in experimental and theoretical areas of chemical physics, including spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, and quantum mechanics. In addition, topical areas such as polymers, soft matter, materials, surfaces/interfaces, and systems of biological relevance are of increasing importance.
Topical coverage includes:
Theoretical Methods and Algorithms
Advanced Experimental Techniques
Atoms, Molecules, and Clusters
Liquids, Glasses, and Crystals
Surfaces, Interfaces, and Materials
Polymers and Soft Matter
Biological Molecules and Networks.